| Literature DB >> 36082241 |
Zuhui Xu1,2, Haican Liu3, Yanping Liu4, Yi Tang2, Yunhong Tan2, Peilei Hu2, Chuanfang Zhang2, Chongguang Yang4, Kanglin Wan3, Qiaozhi Wang2.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) seriously threatens individual and public health. Recently, TB outbreaks in schools have been reported more frequently in China and have attracted widespread attention. We reported three TB outbreaks in high schools in Hunan Province, China.Entities:
Keywords: epidemiological investigation; high school; tuberculosis outbreak; whole genome sequencing
Year: 2022 PMID: 36082241 PMCID: PMC9448353 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S371772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.177
Figure 1Diagram of the close contact survey process. Laboratory test: sputum smear and culture for suspects, DST also conducted if culture positive.
The Status of Contact Survey of Tuberculosis Outbreaks in Three Schools
| Index Case | No. of First Round Screening in Class and Dormitory of the Index Case | Putative Attack Rate in the Class* n (%) | No. of Expanding Screening in the Same Floor# | Putative Attack Rate of Expanding Screening n (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputum Smear | Sputum Culture | Cavity | First Symptom | Time Interval from First Symptom to Definitive Diagnosis (d) | Reason for Finding Delay | ||||||
| School A | Negative | Positive | No | Cough, Expectoration | 46 | Conceal the disease | 57 | 8 (13.8) | 361 | 1 (0.3) | |
| School B | Negative | Positive | Yes | Cough, Expectoration, Hemoptysis | 37 | Delay in seeking medical treatment | 65 | 5 (7.6) | 3955 | 9 (0.2) | |
| School C | Negative | Negative | Yes | Cough, Expectoration, Hemoptysis | 247 | Delay in seeking medical treatment | 51 | 21 (40.4) | 2080 | 5 (0.2) | |
Notes: *Putative attack rate in the class = No. of cases in class and dormitory of the index cases (including the index case) /No. of students in the class and dormitory of the index case. #The expanding screening on the same floor was conducted for the persons except in the first round.
Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of the TB Cases (N = 49)
| Characteristics | School A n (%) | School B n (%) | School C n (%) | Total n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 9(100.0) | 8(57.1) | 19(73.1) | 36(73.5) | 0.07 |
| Female | 0(0.0) | 6(42.9) | 7(26.9) | 13(26.5) | |
| Age | |||||
| 16 | 0(0.0) | 7(50.0) | 1(3.8) | 8(16.3) | < 0.01 |
| 17 | 4(44.4) | 7(50.0) | 12(46.2) | 23(46.9) | |
| 18 | 5(55.6) | 0(0.0) | 12(46.2) | 17(34.7) | |
| 31 | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.8) | 1(2.0) | |
| Occupation | |||||
| Student | 9(100.0) | 14(100.0) | 25(96.2) | 48(98.0) | 1.00 |
| Teacher | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.8) | 1(2.0) | |
| Grade | |||||
| 10th | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.8) | 1(2.0) | < 0.01 |
| 11th | 0(0.0) | 13(92.9) | 1(3.8) | 14(28.6) | |
| 12th | 9(100.0) | 1(7.1) | 24(92.3) | 34(69.4) | |
| The same class or dormitory with the index cases | |||||
| Yes | 8(88.9) | 5(35.7) | 21(80.8) | 34(69.4) | 0.009 |
| No | 1(11.1) | 9(64.3) | 5(19.2) | 15(30.6) | |
| Living in dormitory | |||||
| Yes | 1(11.1) | 3(21.4) | 3(11.5) | 7(14.3) | 0.857 |
| No | 8(88.9) | 11(78.6) | 23(88.5) | 42(85.7) | |
| Contact history | |||||
| Yes | 1(11.1) | 0(0.0) | 1(3.8) | 2(4.1) | 0.414 |
| No | 8(88.9) | 14(100.0) | 25(96.2) | 47(95.9) | |
| TST | |||||
| ≥ 10mm | 4(44.4) | 3(21.4) | 17(65.4) | 24(49.0) | 0.031 |
| < 10mm | 5(55.6) | 11(78.6) | 9(34.6) | 25(51.0) | |
| Cavity | |||||
| Yes | 3(33.3) | 5(35.7) | 2(7.7) | 10(20.4) | 0.05 |
| No | 6(66.7) | 9(64.3) | 24(92.3) | 39(79.6) | |
| Pathogen positive for AFB logy | |||||
| Yes | 7(77.8) | 7(50.0) | 6(23.1) | 20(40.8) | 0.012 |
| No | 2(22.2) | 7(50.0) | 20(76.9) | 29(59.2) | |
| RIF-resistant | |||||
| Yes | 5(55.6) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 5(10.2) | < 0.01 |
| No | 3(33.3) | 7(50.0) | 5(19.2) | 15(30.6) | |
| Not detected | 1(11.1) | 7(50.0) | 21(80.8) | 29(59.2) |
Figure 2The first symptom proportion of the patients.
Figure 3Maximum-likelihood tree of 15 strains annotated with epidemiological characteristics related to drug resistance. Branches are colored by different schools. MDR, rifampicin and isoniazid resistant. INH-mono, rifampicin susceptible and isoniazid resistant. Pan-susceptible, rifampicin and isoniazid susceptible. Patients A0 and B0 were index cases.
The Pairwise SNP Distance Matrix of the 15 School TB Isolates and Reference Strain
| H37Rv | School-C1 | School-C2 | School-C3 | School-C4 | School-C5 | School-A0 | School-A1 | School-A2 | School-A3 | School-B0 | School-B1 | School-B2 | School-B3 | School-B4 | School-B5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H37Rv | 0 | |||||||||||||||
| School-C1 | 1135 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| School-C2 | 1140 | 5 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| School-C3 | 1136 | 3 | 4 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| School-C4 | 1136 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | |||||||||||
| School-C5 | 1120 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 18 | 0 | ||||||||||
| School-A0 | 1205 | 370 | 373 | 373 | 373 | 387 | 0 | |||||||||
| School-A1 | 1206 | 373 | 374 | 376 | 374 | 388 | 3 | 0 | ||||||||
| School-A2 | 656 | 1030 | 1035 | 1031 | 1031 | 1025 | 1098 | 1099 | 0 | |||||||
| School-A3 | 1204 | 369 | 372 | 372 | 372 | 386 | 7 | 10 | 1097 | 0 | ||||||
| School-B0 | 1134 | 351 | 352 | 352 | 350 | 364 | 413 | 414 | 1025 | 410 | 0 | |||||
| School-B1 | 1137 | 350 | 349 | 351 | 351 | 365 | 412 | 413 | 1028 | 409 | 3 | 0 | ||||
| School-B2 | 1136 | 351 | 350 | 352 | 352 | 366 | 413 | 414 | 1027 | 412 | 4 | 3 | 0 | |||
| School-B3 | 1128 | 357 | 356 | 356 | 356 | 372 | 419 | 420 | 1023 | 418 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 0 | ||
| School-B4 | 1133 | 354 | 353 | 353 | 351 | 367 | 416 | 415 | 1026 | 413 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 0 | |
| School-B5 | 1134 | 351 | 350 | 350 | 350 | 366 | 413 | 414 | 1025 | 412 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 |
Note: The red-white-blue color scale represents the pairwise SNP distance from small to large.