| Literature DB >> 36082208 |
Tomoki Horie1, Rikuta Hamaya2,3, Tomoyo Sugiyama1, Hidenori Hirano1, Masahiro Hoshino1, Yoshihisa Kanaji1, Tetsumin Lee1, Taishi Yonetsu4, Tetsuo Sasano4, Tsunekazu Kakuta1.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the clinical utility of synthesized V7-V9 ST-segment elevation (sV7-9 STE) in patients with 12-lead-electrocardiogram (ECG)-based non-STE myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in diagnosing left circumflex artery (LCx) STEMI-equivalent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Background: The 12-lead-ECG is insufficient for diagnosing patients with ACS, especially those with an LCx culprit.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36082208 PMCID: PMC9448611 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9582174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-0597 Impact factor: 1.990
Figure 1Study flow chart. 435 non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients were screened for eligibility. 376 patients underwent PCI. 304 patients had a recording of a synthesized 18-lead ECG on admission.85 patients were excluded according to the criteria. Finally, 219 patients were enrolled in the primary analysis. electrocardiogram, ECG; CRBBB, complete right branch bundle block; CLBBB, complete left branch bundle block; MI, myocardial infarction.
Patient characteristics.
| Total | sV7-9 STE | No STE |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Age, years | 68.8 (11.9) | 63.7 (14.3) | 69.2 (11.7) | 0.07 |
| Men, | 179 (81.7) | 12 (75.0) | 167 (82.3) | 0.70 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.2 (22.1, 26.1) | 26.1 (23.4, 28.4) | 24.1 (22.1, 25.8) | 0.07 |
| Current smoking, | 72 (32.9) | 6 (37.5) | 66 (32.5) | 0.90 |
| Diabetes, | 102 (46.6) | 9 (56.2) | 93 (46.0) | 0.60 |
| Hypertension, | 151 (68.9) | 13 (81.2) | 138 (68.0) | 0.41 |
| Dyslipidemia, | 113 (51.6) | 8 (50.0) | 105 (51.7) | 1.0 |
| Left ventricular EF, % | 57.3 (10.0) | 60.0 (8.6) | 57.2 (10.2) | 0.17 |
| Previous MI, | 46 (21.0) | 1 (6.2) | 45 (22.2) | 0.24 |
| Aspirin at baseline, | 62 (28.36) | 3 (18.8) | 59 (29.1) | 0.55 |
| Chest symptom on admission, | 206 (94.1) | 16 (100.0) | 190 (93.6) | 0.62 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| V1-3 STD, | 19 (8.7) | 5 (31.2) | 14 (6.9) | 0.01 |
| V4-6 STD, | 63 (28.8) | 3 (18.8) | 60 (29.6) | 0.57 |
| I, aVL STD, | 12 (5.5) | 0 (0) | 12 (5.9) | 1.0 |
| II, III, aVF STD, | 27 (12.3) | 0 (0) | 27 (13.3) | 0.25 |
| aVR STD, | 1 (3.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.5) | 1.0 |
| Synthesized V7-9 STD, | 10 (4.6) | 0 (0) | 10 (4.9) | 1.0 |
| Atrial fibrillation, | 16 (7.3) | 0 (0) | 16 (7.9) | 0.54 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| hs-cTnI on admission, ng/L | 436 (154, 1883) | 1055 (380, 6474) | 394 (150, 1799) | 0.06 |
| NT-proBNP on admission, pg/mL | 530 (155, 1829) | 263 (150, 1086) | 581 (161, 2017) | 0.31 |
| Peak hs-cTnI, ng/L | 5759 (2060, 19795) | 36203 (17255, 93105) | 4895 (1913, 15797) | <0.01 |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Killip grade, % | 0.71 | |||
| 1 | 195 | 15 (93.8) | 180 (88.7) | |
| 2 | 16 (7.3) | 1 (6.2) | 15 (7.4) | |
| 3 | 8 (3.7) | 0 (0) | 8 (3.9) | |
| 4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| TIMI score | 4 (3, 5) | 4 (3, 5) | 4 (3, 4) | 0.18 |
| GRACE score | 144 (119, 172) | 113 (94, 142) | 145 (122, 173) | 0.01 |
Values are n (%) for categorical variables and mean (SD) or median [IQR] for continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test, accordingly. STE, ST-segment elevation; STD, ST-segment depression; EF, ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; hs-cTnI, cardiac troponin I; NT-pro BNP, N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.
Angiographical findings.
| Total | sV7-9 STE | No STE |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Culprit vessel, | <0.01 | |||
| LAD | 99 (45.2) | 1 (6.2) | 98 (48.3) | |
| LCx | 58 (26.4) | 13 (81.2) | 45 (22.2) | |
| RCA | 62 (28.3) | 2 (12.5) | 60 (29.6) | |
|
| ||||
| Culprit TIMI flow, | <0.01 | |||
| 0 | 15 (6.8) | 5 (31.3) | 10 (4.9) | |
| 1 | 14 (6.4) | 3 (18.8) | 11 (5.4) | |
| 2 | 60 (27.4) | 5 (31.3) | 55 (27.1) | |
| 3 | 130 (59.4) | 3 (18.8) | 127 (62.6) | |
| Multivessel disease, | 61 (27.9) | 5 (31.2) | 56 (27.6) | 0.98 |
| Diameter stenosis, % (AHA class) | 90 (90, 990) | 100 (99, 100) | 90 (90, 99) | 0.01 |
| Post-PCI residual stenosis, % (AHA class) | 0 [0, 0] | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 25) | 0.77 |
| Post-PCI no reflow, | ||||
|
| ||||
| (TIMI flow 0–2) | 18 (8.2) | 0 (0) | 18 (8.9) | 0.37 |
Values are n (%) for categorical variables and mean (SD) or median [IQR] for continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test, accordingly. sV7-9, synthesized V7-9; STE, ST-segment elevation; STD, ST-segment depression; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; LCx, left circumflex coronary artery; RCA, right coronary artery; AHA, American heart association; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; CK, creatinine kinase; hs-cTnI, cardiac troponin I; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2ROC curves for predicting LCx STEMI-equivalent ACS. Comparison of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for typical baseline parameters. The top panel shows the ROC curve for diagnosing left circumflex (LCx) ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-equivalent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) when defined by thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow, in which sV7-9 STE showed the best diagnostic performance in terms of area under the curve (AUC).
Univariate logistic regression analysis and ROC curve analysis for prediction of LCx STEMI-equivalent ACS.
| Univariate logistic regression | ROC curve analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI |
| AUC | 95% CI | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | |
| sV7-9 STE | 19.0 | 5.6–63.9 | <0.001 | 0.71 | 0.58–0.84 | 46.7 | 95.6 | 92.2 |
| V1-3 STD | 2.9 | 0.8–11.5 | 0.122 | 0.56 | 0.45–0.67 | 20.0 | 92.6 | 87.7 |
| Age, years | 1.0 | 1.0–1.0 | 0.645 | 0.51 | 0.34–0.68 | 46.7 | 64.7 | 65.8 |
| Woman | 1.7 | 0.5–5.6 | 0.388 | 0.55 | 0.43–0.66 | 26.7 | 82.4 | 78.5 |
| Left ventricular EF, % | 1.0 | 1.0–1.1 | 0.475 | 0.57 | 0.44–0.71 | 60.0 | 61.8 | 63.5 |
| Killip 1 | 1.8 | 0.2–14.2 | 0.586 | 0.52 | 0.45–0.59 | 93.3 | 11.3 | 16.9 |
| GRACE score | 1.0 | 0.8–1.1 | 0.474 | 0.56 | 0.39–0.73 | 53.3 | 64.7 | 63.9 |
| TIMI score | 0.64 | 0.4–1.1 | 0.077 | 0.59 | 0.45–0.74 | 40.0 | 68.1 | 64.4 |
| hs-cTnI on admission | 1.1 | 1.0–1.1 | 0.070 | 0.65 | 0.50–0.80 | 80.0 | 48.0 | 60.7 |
Numbers are calculated based on univariate linear regression and receiver-operation characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The cut-off point in the ROC curve analysis for calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was defined as the value with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity. Variables included the presence of sV7-9 STE (yes/no), V1-3 STD (yes/no), age (continuous), sex (man or woman), left ventricular ejection fraction (continuous), Killip grade (1 or other), GRACE score (per 10 unit, continuous), and hs-cTnI on admission (per 1000 ng/L, continuous). p-value threshold was 0.006 after the Bonferroni correction. sV7-9, synthesized V7-9; STE, ST-segment elevation; STD, ST-segment depression; LCx, left circumflex coronary artery; EF, ejection fraction; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; hs-cTnI, cardiac troponin I; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristics; AUC, the area under the curve.
Multivariate linear regression analysis for peak hs-cTnI.
| Variables | Multivariate linear regression | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Percent difference (%) | 95% CI |
| |
| sV7-9 STE | 308 | 78–834 | 0.001 |
| V1-3 STD | 115 | 1–369 | 0.055 |
| Woman | −5.73 | −44.5, 52.2 | 0.671 |
| GRACE score | 3.15 | −2.77, 9.42 | 0.134 |
| hs-cTnI on admission | 11.1 | 7.47–14.9 | <0.001 |
Numbers are calculated based on multivariable linear regression. Peak hs-cTnI was logarithmically transformed to approximate the normal distribution, and the exp (coefficient) − 1 was interpreted as the percent difference of the mean hs-cTnI. Models were adjusted for V1-3 STD (yes/no), sex (man or woman), GRACE score (per 10 unit, continuous); and hs-cTnI on admission (per 1000 n/L, continuous). p-value threshold was 0.006 after the Bonferroni correction. STE, ST-segment elevation; STD, ST-segment depression; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; hs-cTnI, cardiac troponin I.
Figure 3Representative cases. (a) The case is a 44-year-old man. On admission, synthesized V7-9 ST-segment elevation (STE) is observed, accompanied by ST-segment depression in V1 and V2 (A). Urgent coronary angiography confirmed thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 0 flow of the mid left circumflex (LCx) culprit (B). After successful revascularization, ST-segment resolution in synthesized V7-9 (C), and late gadolinium enhancement of the posterior wall (D) were observed. (b) The case is a 42-year-old man. On admission, the electrocardiogram including synthesized V7-9 was nondiagnostic (E). Urgent CAG revealed 90% stenosis with TIMI 3 grade flow of the mid LCx (G).