| Literature DB >> 36082108 |
Jianpeng Yu1, Qi Zhou1, Ying Xu1, Tieyun Wang1, Jun Du1, Lifang Zhao1, Juan Li1, Haiyan Wang1, Qianqian Xu2, Xueli Lai1, Zhiyong Guo1.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between serum folate (FA) levels and residual renal function (RRF) in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients.Entities:
Keywords: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; folate; residual renal function
Year: 2022 PMID: 36082108 PMCID: PMC9447445 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S379594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Figure 1Frequency distribution histogram of serum FA levels.
Figure 2Flowchart of the study.
Comparison of Observation Indices Between the 2 Groups
| Factors | All (n=180) | FA Deficiency (n=83) | FA Non-Deficiency (n=97) | Statistical Magnitude | P value # |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 53±14 | 52±15 | 54±13 | t= 1.052 | 0.294 |
| Sex | 0.809 | ||||
| Male | 85 (47.2%) | 40 (48.2%) | 45 (46.4%) | ||
| Female | 95 (52.8%) | 43 (51.8%) | 52 (53.6%) | ||
| PD vintage (month) | 18.9 [4.54–48.83] | 19.33 [2.77–45.03] | 18.2 [4.60–54.29] | Z= −0.452 | 0.651 |
| Hb (g/L) | 97±22 | 95±22 | 98±22 | t= 0.803 | 0.423 |
| MCV (fL) | 90.7±5.7 | 91.2±6.0 | 90.4±5.5 | t= −0.896 | 0.371 |
| Total Kt/V | 1.84 [1.66–2.05] | 1.84 [1.65–2.04] | 1.85 [1.69–2.08] | Z= −0.585 | 0.558 |
| Residual kidney Kt/V‡ | 0.37 [0.00–0.78] | 0.21 [0.00–0.64] | 0.49 [0.08–0.92] | Z= −2.655 | 0.008 |
| Peritoneal Kt/V† | 1.37 [1.01–1.70] | 1.48 [1.04–1.78] | 1.29 [0.97–1.63] | Z= −2.063 | 0.039 |
| cytC (mg/L)† | 7.0±1.7 | 7.5±1.6 | 6.6±1.7 | t= −3.482 | 0.001 |
| Scr (mmol/L)† | 847 [661–1105] | 928 [726–1163] | 794 [633.50–1016.25] | Z= −2.643 | 0.008 |
| Ultrafiltration volume (mL) | 260 [0.00–654.25] | 323 [17.5–771] | 255 [0.00–528] | Z= −1.284 | 0.199 |
| RBP (mg/L) | 112.0±24.1 | 112.2±24.3 | 111.8±24.2 | t= −0.110 | 0.912 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 18 [14.90–22.00] | 17.5 [14.8–20.8] | 18.5 [15.10–23.45] | Z= −1.288 | 0.198 |
| Ccr | 56.79 [46.49–75.29] | 54.71 [43.73–69.62] | 58.27 [50.17–79.17] | Z= −1.351 | 0.177 |
| Primary disease | 0.312 | ||||
| DN | 25 (13.9%) | 9 (10.8%) | 16 (16.5%) | ||
| NDN | 155 (86.3%) | 74 (89.2%) | 84 (86.6%) |
Notes: #Compared to the deficiency and non-deficiency groups. †Value is significantly higher than the corresponding value in the non-deficiency group (P < 0.05). ‡Value is significantly lower than the corresponding value in the non-deficiency group (P < 0.05).
Univariate Correlations Between Serum FA Level and Other Factors
| Factors | Spearman | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.122 | 0.103 |
| PD vintage | −0.006 | 0.935 |
| Hb | 0.110 | 0.145 |
| MCV | −0.009 | 0.904 |
| Total Kt/V | 0.099 | 0.203 |
| Residual kidney Kt/V ** | 0.251 | 0.001 |
| Peritoneum Kt/V * | −0.181 | 0.014 |
| cytC ** | −0.326 | 0.000 |
| Scr ** | −0.287 | 0.000 |
| Ultrafiltration volume | −0.072 | 0.379 |
| RBP | −0.076 | 0.316 |
| BUN | 0.104 | 0.162 |
| Ccr | 0.139 | 0.075 |
Notes: Differences were considered to be statistically significant at *P<0.05, ** P<0.01.
Linear Regression Analysis Results
| Parameter | Model 1 | AdjR2 | Model 2 | AdjR2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | P | B | SE | P | |||
| Residual kidney Kt/V* | 0.045 | 0.021 | 0.035 | 0.027 | 0.045 | 0.021 | 0.036 | 0.110 |
| Ccr | 1.924 | 1.095 | 0.081 | 0.049 | 1.782 | 1.074 | 0.100 | 0.086 |
Notes: Model 1 adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 was Model 1 plus adjustments for LP(a) and BNP. The beta coefficients refer to how many deviations a dependent variable will have per deviation increase in the predictor variable. SE refers to the standard error. The adjusted R2 represents the goodness of fit, which is used to measure the degree of the estimated models fitting the observations. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at *P<0.05.