Literature DB >> 36081835

Variability and Uncertainty Challenges in Scaling Imaging Spectroscopy Retrievals and Validations from Leaves Up to Vegetation Canopies.

Zbyněk Malenovský1,2,3, Lucie Homolová2, Petr Lukeš2, Henning Buddenbaum4, Jochem Verrelst5, Luis Alonso5, Michael E Schaepman6, Nicolas Lauret7, Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry7.   

Abstract

Imaging spectroscopy of vegetation requires methods for scaling and generalizing optical signals that are reflected, transmitted and emitted in the solar wavelength domain from single leaves and observed at the level of canopies by proximal sensing, airborne and satellite spectroradiometers. The upscaling embedded in imaging spectroscopy retrievals and validations of plant biochemical and structural traits is challenged by natural variability and measurement uncertainties. Sources of the leaf-to-canopy upscaling variability and uncertainties are reviewed with respect to: (1) implementation of retrieval algorithms and (2) their parameterization and validation of quantitative products through in situ field measurements. The challenges are outlined and discussed for empirical and physical leaf and canopy radiative transfer modelling components, considering both forward and inverse modes. Discussion on optical remote sensing validation schemes includes also description of a multiscale validation concept and its advantages. Impacts of intraspecific and interspecific variability on collected field and laboratory measurements of leaf biochemical traits and optical properties are demonstrated for selected plant species, and field measurement uncertainty sources are listed and discussed specifically for foliar pigments and canopy leaf area index. The review concludes with the main findings and suggestions as how to reduce uncertainties and include variability in scaling vegetation imaging spectroscopy signals and functional traits of single leaves up to observations of whole canopies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging spectroscopy; Inversion; Multiscale validation; Quantitative remote sensing; Radiative transfer models; Retrieval of vegetation traits; Scaling; Uncertainty; Variability

Year:  2019        PMID: 36081835      PMCID: PMC7613335          DOI: 10.1007/s10712-019-09534-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Geophys        ISSN: 0169-3298            Impact factor:   7.965


  16 in total

1.  Novel efficient methods for measuring mesophyll anatomical characteristics from fresh thick sections using stereology and confocal microscopy: application on acid rain-treated Norway spruce needles.

Authors:  Jana Albrechtová; Jirí Janácek; Zuzana Lhotáková; Barbora Radochová; Lucie Kubínová
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 6.992

2.  Antarctic moss stress assessment based on chlorophyll content and leaf density retrieved from imaging spectroscopy data.

Authors:  Zbyněk Malenovský; Johanna D Turnbull; Arko Lucieer; Sharon A Robinson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content.

Authors:  Yuri Knyazikhin; Mitchell A Schull; Pauline Stenberg; Matti Mõttus; Miina Rautiainen; Yan Yang; Alexander Marshak; Pedro Latorre Carmona; Robert K Kaufmann; Philip Lewis; Mathias I Disney; Vern Vanderbilt; Anthony B Davis; Frédéric Baret; Stéphane Jacquemoud; Alexei Lyapustin; Ranga B Myneni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Accurate measurement of optical properties of narrow leaves and conifer needles with a typical integrating sphere and spectroradiometer.

Authors:  Hibiki M Noda; Takeshi Motohka; Kazutaka Murakami; Hiroyuki Muraoka; Kenlo Nishida Nasahara
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship.

Authors:  Christopher Parry; J Mark Blonquist; Bruce Bugbee
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  Imaging spectroscopy algorithms for mapping canopy foliar chemical and morphological traits and their uncertainties.

Authors:  Aditya Singh; Shawn P Serbin; Brenden E McNeil; Clayton C Kingdon; Philip A Townsend
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product.

Authors:  Eric Vermote; Chris Justice; Martin Claverie; Belen Franch
Journal:  Remote Sens Environ       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 10.164

8.  A new optical leaf-clip meter for simultaneous non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids.

Authors:  Zoran G Cerovic; Guillaume Masdoumier; Naïma Ben Ghozlen; Gwendal Latouche
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.500

9.  Estimating leaf area index in Southeast Alaska: a comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  Carolyn A Eckrich; Elizabeth A Flaherty; Merav Ben-David
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial Variation of Leaf Optical Properties in a Boreal Forest Is Influenced by Species and Light Environment.

Authors:  Jon Atherton; Beñat Olascoaga; Luis Alonso; Albert Porcar-Castell
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.