Literature DB >> 36081834

Quantifying Vegetation Biophysical Variables from Imaging Spectroscopy Data: A Review on Retrieval Methods.

Jochem Verrelst1, Zbyněk Malenovský2,3,4, Christiaan Van der Tol5, Gustau Camps-Valls1, Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry6, Philip Lewis7,8, Peter North9, Jose Moreno1.   

Abstract

An unprecedented spectroscopic data stream will soon become available with forthcoming Earth-observing satellite missions equipped with imaging spectroradiometers. This data stream will open up a vast array of opportunities to quantify a diversity of biochemical and structural vegetation properties. The processing requirements for such large data streams require reliable retrieval techniques enabling the spatiotemporally explicit quantification of biophysical variables. With the aim of preparing for this new era of Earth observation, this review summarizes the state-of-the-art retrieval methods that have been applied in experimental imaging spectroscopy studies inferring all kinds of vegetation biophysical variables. Identified retrieval methods are categorized into: (1) parametric regression, including vegetation indices, shape indices and spectral transformations; (2) nonparametric regression, including linear and nonlinear machine learning regression algorithms; (3) physically based, including inversion of radiative transfer models (RTMs) using numerical optimization and look-up table approaches; and (4) hybrid regression methods, which combine RTM simulations with machine learning regression methods. For each of these categories, an overview of widely applied methods with application to mapping vegetation properties is given. In view of processing imaging spectroscopy data, a critical aspect involves the challenge of dealing with spectral multicollinearity. The ability to provide robust estimates, retrieval uncertainties and acceptable retrieval processing speed are other important aspects in view of operational processing. Recommendations towards new-generation spectroscopy-based processing chains for operational production of biophysical variables are given.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging spectroscopy; Inversion; Machine learning; Parametric and nonparametric regression; Radiative transfer models; Retrieval; Uncertainties; Vegetation properties

Year:  2018        PMID: 36081834      PMCID: PMC7613341          DOI: 10.1007/s10712-018-9478-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Geophys        ISSN: 0169-3298            Impact factor:   7.965


  20 in total

Review 1.  Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants.

Authors:  S V Ollinger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 2.  Accounting for uncertainty in ecological analysis: the strengths and limitations of hierarchical statistical modeling.

Authors:  Noel Cressie; Catherine A Calder; James S Clark; Jay M Ver Hoef; Christopher K Wikle
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Antarctic moss stress assessment based on chlorophyll content and leaf density retrieved from imaging spectroscopy data.

Authors:  Zbyněk Malenovský; Johanna D Turnbull; Arko Lucieer; Sharon A Robinson
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  [Hyperspectral Estimation of Apple Tree Canopy LAI Based on SVM and RF Regression].

Authors:  Zhao-ying Han; Xi-cun Zhu; Xian-yi Fang; Zhuo-yuan Wang; Ling Wang; Geng-Xing Zhao; Yuan-mao Jiang
Journal:  Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.589

6.  Amazon forests maintain consistent canopy structure and greenness during the dry season.

Authors:  Douglas C Morton; Jyoteshwar Nagol; Claudia C Carabajal; Jacqueline Rosette; Michael Palace; Bruce D Cook; Eric F Vermote; David J Harding; Peter R J North
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  [A hyperspectral assessment model for leaf chlorophyll content of Pinus massoniana based on neural network].

Authors:  Wen Ya Liu; Jie Pan
Journal:  Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao       Date:  2017-04-18

8.  Models of fluorescence and photosynthesis for interpreting measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence.

Authors:  C van der Tol; J A Berry; P K E Campbell; U Rascher
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.822

9.  Plant Family-Specific Impacts of Petroleum Pollution on Biodiversity and Leaf Chlorophyll Content in the Amazon Rainforest of Ecuador.

Authors:  Paul Arellano; Kevin Tansey; Heiko Balzter; Markus Tellkamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Non-Destructive Evaluation of the Leaf Nitrogen Concentration by In-Field Visible/Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Pear Orchards.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Changwei Shen; Na Liu; Xin Jin; Xueshan Fan; Caixia Dong; Yangchun Xu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  3 in total

1.  Seasonal Mapping of Irrigated Winter Wheat Traits in Argentina with a Hybrid Retrieval Workflow Using Sentinel-2 Imagery.

Authors:  Gabriel Caballero; Alejandro Pezzola; Cristina Winschel; Alejandra Casella; Paolo Sanchez Angonova; Juan Pablo Rivera-Caicedo; Katja Berger; Jochem Verrelst; Jesus Delegido
Journal:  Remote Sens (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Introducing ARTMO's Machine-Learning Classification Algorithms Toolbox: Application to Plant-Type Detection in a Semi-Steppe Iranian Landscape.

Authors:  Masoumeh Aghababaei; Ataollah Ebrahimi; Ali Asghar Naghipour; Esmaeil Asadi; Adrián Pérez-Suay; Miguel Morata; Jose Luis Garcia; Juan Pablo Rivera Caicedo; Jochem Verrelst
Journal:  Remote Sens (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mapping landscape canopy nitrogen content from space using PRISMA data.

Authors:  Jochem Verrelst; Juan Pablo Rivera-Caicedo; Pablo Reyes-Muñoz; Miguel Morata; Eatidal Amin; Giulia Tagliabue; Cinzia Panigada; Tobias Hank; Katja Berger
Journal:  ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 11.774

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.