| Literature DB >> 36081734 |
Yang Yang1, Tianyuan Liu1, Yu Jia2.
Abstract
Internet addiction among older adults is a new problem in many countries. However, previous studies on excessive Internet use have focused more on young people, and only few studies have focused on Internet addiction in older adults. There is a need to continue to expand research on Internet addiction in older adults. This paper aimed to fill the gap in exiting literature. We adopted a self-reported questionnaire to assess the elderly's interaction with children, loneliness, life satisfaction and Internet addiction among old adults. A total of 241 old people were obtained from data collection in China via online survey with the help of a professional research company. We used OLS regression analysis and bootstrap method to test the hypothesis. The results of the empirical analysis indicated that (1) interaction with children was significantly negatively associated with the Internet addiction of old people; (2) loneliness mediated the relationship between interaction with children and old adults' Internet addiction; and (3) life satisfaction moderated the effect of interaction with children, and the indirect effect between interaction with children and old adults' addiction via loneliness was stronger for those with low life satisfaction. Finally, we discussed the theoretical significance, practical implications, limitation of this research. Interventions to improve family function systems especially for older people with low life satisfaction can help prevent the development of Internet addiction.Entities:
Keywords: interaction with children; internet addiction; life satisfaction; loneliness; older adults
Year: 2022 PMID: 36081734 PMCID: PMC9448416 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989942
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1The conceptual model of this study.
Descriptive statistics and correlations among all variables.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) |
| (1) Internet addiction | 1 | ||||||||||
| (2) Interaction with children | −0.145 | 1 | |||||||||
| (3) Loneliness | 0.209 | −0.231 | 1 | ||||||||
| (4) Life satisfaction | −0.145 | 0.139 | −0.528 | 1 | |||||||
| (5) Age | −0.207 | 0.126 | −0.126 | 0.086 | 1 | ||||||
| (6) Gender | −0.040 | −0.139 | 0.017 | −0.032 | 0.005 | 1 | |||||
| (7) Education level | 0.128 | 0.016 | −0.099 | 0.059 | −0.126 | 0.186 | 1 | ||||
| (8) Number of children | −0.232 | 0.083 | 0.031 | 0.046 | 0.304 | 0.063 | −0.303 | 1 | |||
| (9) Living with children | 0.127 | 0.326 | 0.036 | −0.120 | −0.041 | −0.185 | −0.047 | −0.119 | 1 | ||
| (10) Taking care of grandchildren. | 0.225 | 0.253 | 0.088 | −0.013 | −0.253 | −0.035 | 0.129 | −0.142 | 0.331 | 1 | |
| (11) Estimated daily time on Internet | 0.550 | −0.003 | 0.031 | −0.132 | −0.087 | −0.010 | 0.123 | −0.128 | 0.216 | 0.091 | 1 |
| Mean | 2.078 | 3.967 | 2.096 | 3.471 | 67.888 | 0.510 | 2.241 | 2.403 | 0.303 | Mean | 2.078 |
| SD | 0.700 | 1.012 | 0.597 | 0.724 | 5.901 | 0.501 | 1.272 | 1.248 | 0.460 | SD | 0.700 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001.
N = 241.
Gender: 1—male, 0—female. Education level: 1—primary degrees or below, 2—secondary degrees, 3—high school degrees, 4—associate degrees, 5—bachelor’s degrees or above. Ling with children: 1—yes, 0—no. Taking care of grandchildren: 1—yes, 0—no.
Results of hierarchical regression analysis.
| Variables | Loneliness | Internet addiction | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | Model 8 | |
| Control variables | ||||||||
| Age | −0.009 | −0.006 | −0.007 | −0.007 | −0.005 | −0.007 | −0.005 | −0.005 |
| Gender | 0.013 | −0.019 | −0.035 | −0.072 | −0.075 | −0.076 | −0.072 | −0.070 |
| Education level | −0.046 | −0.027 | −0.017 | 0.007 | 0.015 | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Number of children | 0.039 | 0.042 | 0.040 | −0.056 | −0.063 | −0.056 | −0.064 | −0.064 |
| Living with children | 0.111 | 0.008 | −0.005 | −0.020 | −0.040 | −0.032 | −0.033 | −0.032 |
| Taking care of grandchildren | 0.159 | 0.166 | 0.172 | 0.276 | 0.248 | 0.277 | 0.244 | 0.243 |
| Estimated daily time on Internet | 0.005 | −0.013 | −0.009 | 0.210 | 0.209 | 0.208 | 0.210 | 0.210 |
| Independent variable | ||||||||
| Interaction with children | −0.168 | −0.118 | −0.111 | −0.124 | −0.095 | −0.119 | −0.096 | −0.096 |
| Moderator | ||||||||
| Life satisfaction | −0.412 | −0.421 | −0.046 | 0.034 | 0.037 | |||
| Interaction 1 | ||||||||
| Interaction with children | 0.120 | −0.015 | ||||||
| Mediator | ||||||||
| Loneliness | 0.174 | 0.195 | 0.199 | |||||
| _cons | 2.597 | 2.435 | 2.439 | 2.556 | 1.989 | 2.676 | 1.830 | 1.559 |
|
| 0.104 | 0.336 | 0.356 | 0.390 | 0.410 | 0.392 | 0.411 | 0.411 |
p < 0.05;
p < 0.01, and
p < 0.001.
N = 241.
Non-standardized mediation analysis results.
| Model paths | Estimate | SE | BC 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Total effect | ||||
| Interaction with children → Internet addiction | −0.124 | 0.039 | −0.202 | −0.047 |
| Direct effect | ||||
| Interaction with children → Loneliness | −0.168 | 0.040 | −0.248 | −0.088 |
| Loneliness → Internet addiction | 0.174 | 0.063 | 0.050 | 0.297 |
| Interaction with children → Internet addiction | −0.095 | 0.040 | −0.175 | −0.016 |
| Indirect effect | ||||
| Interaction with children → Loneliness → Internet addiction | −0.029 | 0.014 | −0.086 | −0.008 |
BC, biased corrected (5,000 bootstrapping sample). Control variables (age, gender, education level, number of children, living with children, and taking care of grandchildren) were added to the non-standardized mediation analysis.
Figure 2Moderating effect of life satisfaction.
Moderated mediation results.
| Moderator variable | Estimate | SE | BC 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Life satisfaction low (-1SD) | −0.034 | 0.016 | −0.068 | −0.007 |
| Life satisfaction high (+1SD) | −0.004 | 0.010 | −0.026 | 0.014 |
| Index | 0.021 | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.046 |
BC, biased corrected (5,000 bootstrapping sample). Control variables (age, gender, education level, number of children, living with children, and taking care of grandchildren) were added to the non-standardized mediation analysis.