| Literature DB >> 36081733 |
Julia Sánchez-García1, Andrea Vega-Tinoco1, Ana I Gil-Lacruz1, Diana C Mira-Tamayo1, Miguel Moya2, Marta Gil-Lacruz3.
Abstract
Membership in voluntary organizations is associated with individual and social benefits. Due to the negative consequences of the global pandemic on older people, and the governmental challenges posed by population aging, voluntary membership is of great importance to society. To effectively promote volunteering among older people, it is necessary to understand the determinants of voluntary membership. This study analyses the influence of individual values-secular/traditional and survival/self-expression-on voluntary membership among European adults (N = 31,985). Specifically, it examines which values orient two age groups (middle age: 50-64 and old age: 65-79), as well as men and women toward a certain type of association (Social Awareness; Professional and Political; Education and Leisure; Religion). The sample of 31,985 comprises 60% of adults aged 50-64 and 40% aged 65-79; of which 56% are women and 44% men. The empirical estimation considers different levels of data aggregation: individual, national and welfare system, therefore multilevel analysis is used as an analytical strategy. Individual-level variables from the Integrated Values Survey (2005/09, 2010/14, and 2017/20) and national-level variables (Gini Index and Gross Domestic Product Per Capita) from the World Bank and Eurostat are used. The results indicate that traditional and self-expression values promote membership in voluntary organizations in general more than secular and survival values. However, there are differences according to the type of organization. Furthermore, values are found to moderate the effect of age and gender on voluntary membership.Entities:
Keywords: gender; middle-aged; old age; values; voluntary membership
Year: 2022 PMID: 36081733 PMCID: PMC9447440 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Variables (means and standard deviation by gender and age).
| Total | Female | Male | 50–64 | 65–79 | ||||||
| Mean (%) | SD | Mean (%) | SD | Mean (%) | SD | Mean (%) | SD | Mean (%) | SD | |
|
| ||||||||||
| All categories | 40.9 | 0.49 | 38.6 | 0.49 | 43.9 | 0.50 | 41.1 | 0.49 | 40.7 | 0.49 |
| Social Awareness | 11.9 | 0.32 | 11.9 | 0.32 | 11.9 | 0.32 | 11.6 | 0.32 | 12.3 | 0.33 |
| Politics and profession | 19.0 | 0.39 | 15.4 | 0.36 | 23.6 | 0.42 | 22.0 | 0.41 | 14.5 | 0.35 |
| Leisure and education | 19.9 | 0.40 | 17.6 | 0.38 | 22.9 | 0.42 | 19.9 | 0.40 | 20.0 | 0.40 |
| Religion | 19.4 | 0.39 | 20.1 | 0.40 | 18.5 | 0.39 | 17.2 | 0.38 | 22.6 | 41.8 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Age: 50–64 | 60.2 | 0.49 | 60.1 | 0.49 | 60.3 | 0.49 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Age: 55–79 | 39.8 | 0.49 | 39.9 | 0.49 | 39.7 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.00 |
| Female | 55.9 | 0.50 | 100 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 55.9 | 0.50 | 56.0 | 0.50 |
| Male | 44.1 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.00 | 44.1 | 0.50 | 43.9 | 0.50 |
| Primary studies | 33.3 | 0.47 | 33.4 | 0.47 | 33.1 | 0.47 | 29.8 | 0.46 | 38.6 | 0.49 |
| Secondary studies | 36.1 | 0.48 | 35.4 | 0.48 | 37.2 | 0.48 | 40.2 | 0.49 | 30.1 | 0.46 |
| Tertiary studies | 12.7 | 0.33 | 11.9 | 0.32 | 13.8 | 0.34 | 13.7 | 0.34 | 11.3 | 0.32 |
| Low income | 37.8 | 0.48 | 42.2 | 0.49 | 32.4 | 0.47 | 33.8 | 0.47 | 43.9 | 0.49 |
| Middle income | 51.6 | 0.50 | 49.1 | 0.50 | 54.7 | 0.50 | 53.8 | 0.50 | 48.4 | 0.50 |
| High income | 10.5 | 0.31 | 8.7 | 0.28 | 12.8 | 0.33 | 12.4 | 0.33 | 7.7 | 0.27 |
| Married | 66.5 | 0.47 | 57. 6 | 0.49 | 77.7 | 0.42 | 71.4 | 0.45 | 59.1 | 0.49 |
| Divorced | 10.1 | 0.30 | 11.3 | 0.32 | 8.7 | 0.26 | 12.2 | 0.33 | 7.0 | 0.26 |
| Widow | 17.8 | 0.38 | 25.9 | 0.44 | 7.5 | 0.26 | 9.8 | 0.30 | 30.0 | 0.46 |
| Single | 5.5 | 0.22 | 5.1 | 0.22 | 6.1 | 0.24 | 6.7 | 0.25 | 3.8 | 0.19 |
| Traditional/secular values | 17.8 | 1.54 | 9.2 | 1.50 | 26.9 | 1.57 | 22.5 | 1.56 | 9.0 | 1.50 |
| Survival/self-expression values | 14.3 | 2.05 | 2.4 | 2.07 | 28.7 | 2.01 | 18.9 | 2.03 | 7.0 | 2.07 |
We have also included Macro Variables (GDP ppp and Gini index). Regional Dummy Variables (Nordic: Sweden; Continental: Germany, the Netherlands; Mediterranean: Cyprus, Spain, and Turkey; and Eastern: Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Ukraine, Russia, and Georgia) and Time Dummy Variables (Wave 1: 2005–2009; Wave 2: 2010–2014; and Wave 3: 2017–2020).
FIGURE 1Values by gender and age, 2005/09, 2010/14, and 2017/20 (Data in percentages). Integrated Values Survey, own production.
Estimations of individual-level variables on volunteering: Model 1.
| All categories | Social awareness | Politic and professional | Leisure and education | Religion | |
| Intercept | –0.60 | –2.69 | –2.16 | –2.08 | –1.62 |
|
| |||||
| Age: 50–64 | 0.16 | –0.10 | 0.51 | 0.09 | –0.06 |
| Age: 65–79 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Female | –0.08 | 0.29 | –0.45 | –0.14 | 0.22 |
| Male | – | – | – | – | – |
| Primary studies | – | – | – | – | – |
| Secondary studies | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 0.27 | –0.08 |
| Tertiary studies | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.08 |
| Low income | – | – | – | – | – |
| Middle income | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.06 |
| High income | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.02 |
| Married | – | – | – | – | – |
| Divorced | –0.16 | –0.15 | –0.11 | –0.24 | –0.30 |
| Widow | –0.03 | –0.11 | –0.22 | –0.14 | 0.04 |
| Single | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.05 | –0.10 | 0.01 |
| Traditional/secular values | –0.10 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.00 | –0.39 |
| Survival/self-expression values | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.21 | –0.10 |
| Wave: 2005–2009 | –0.40 | –0.48 | 0.01 | –0.46 | –0.40 |
| Wave: 2010–2014 | –0.05 | –0.33 | 0.07 | –0.25 | 0.07 |
| Wave: 2017–2020 | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| |||||
| σ2 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.54 | 0.99 | 1.15 |
| LR test (Prob[ > | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ICC | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.29 |
|
| |||||
| Between groups | 25627.37 | 17676.01 | 3475.06 | 25631.12 | 33442.39 |
| Within groups | 7337.84 | 15380.70 | 4448.27 | 8967.55 | 8850.29 |
| Barlett’s test | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Coefficients are reported. ICC: intra-class correlation index. ***, **, and * explanatory variables are statistically significant at 99, 95, and 90% levels.
aVariable of reference.
Estimations of individual-level and national-level variables on volunteering: Model 2.
| All categories | Social awareness | Politic and professional | Leisure and education | Religion | |
| Intercept_ | –5.21 | –7.48 | –3.63 | –3.86 | –2.08 |
|
| |||||
| Age: 50–64 | 0.17 | –0.09 | 0.51 | 0.09 | –0.06 |
| Age: 65–79 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Female | –0.07 | 0.29 | –0.45 | –0.14 | 0.22 |
| Male | – | – | – | – | – |
| Primary studies | – | – | – | – | – |
| Secondary studies | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.27 | –0.08 |
| Tertiary studies | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.08 |
| Low income | – | – | – | – | – |
| Middle income | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.06 |
| High income | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.01 |
| Married | – | – | – | – | – |
| Divorced | –0.16 | –0.16 | –0.11 | –0.24 | –0.31 |
| Widow | –0.03 | –0.11 | –0.22 | –0.14 | 0.04 |
| Single | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.05 | –0.10 | 0.01 |
| Traditional/secular Values | –0.10 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | –0.39 |
| Survival/self-expression values | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.20 | –0.10 |
| Gini index | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| GDP | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Nordic | – | – | – | – | – |
| Continental | –0.85 | –0.46 | –0.89 | 0.24 | –0.68 |
| Southern | –2.81 | –1.40 | –1.02 | –0.71 | 2.98 |
| East | –1.71 | –1.26 | –0.62 | –0.49 | 2.09 |
| Wave: 2005–2009 | –0.18 | –0.18 | 0.16 | –0.22 | –0.27 |
| Wave: 2010–2014 | 0.11 | –0.10 | 0.19 | –0.07 | 0.16 |
| Wave: 2017–2020 | – | – | – | – | – |
|
| |||||
| σ2 | 1.00 | 1.10 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.72 |
| LR test (Prob[ > | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ICC | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
Coefficients are reported. ICC: intra-class correlation index. ***, **, and * explanatory variables are statistically significant at 99, 95, and 90% levels.
aVariable of reference.
bThe Wald endogeneity test was estimated. There is no empirical evidence of endogeneity.
Estimates of the moderating effect of values on volunteering: Model 3 by age and gender.
| All categories | Social awareness | Politic and professional | Leisure and education | Religion | |
| Intercept_ | –5.19 | –7.37 | –3.60 | –3.70 | –2.10 |
|
| |||||
| Age: 50–64 | 0.16 | –0.03 | 0.47 | 0.16 | -0.06 |
| Age: 65–79 | – | – | – | – | – |
| Female | –0.09 | 0.17 | –0.45 | –0.26 | 0.24 |
| Male | – | – | – | – | – |
| Primary studies | – | – | – | – | – |
| Secondary studies | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.12 | 0.27 | –0.08 |
| Tertiary studies | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.08 |
| Low income | – | – | – | – | – |
| Middle income | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.06 |
| High income | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.01 |
| Married | – | – | – | – | – |
| Divorced | –0.16 | –0.16 | –0.11 | –0.24 | –0.31 |
| Widow | –0.03 | –0.08 | –0.22 | –0.11 | 0.03 |
| Single | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.04 | –0.10 | 0.00 |
| Traditional/secular values | –0.15 | –0.05 | –0.01 | –0.02 | -0.45 |
| Survival/self-expression values | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.20 | –0.09 |
| Gini index | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| GDP | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Nordic | – | – | – | – | – |
| Continental | –0.86 | –0.46 | –0.90 | 0.25 | –0.69 |
| Southern | –2.84 | –1.38 | –1.05 | –0.65 | –3.00 |
| East | –1.73 | –1.23 | –0.65 | –0.43 | 2.11 |
| Age 50–64 × Traditional/secular | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 | –0.01 | 0.05 |
| Age 50–64 × Survival/self-expression | 0.02 | –0.05 | 0.04 | –0.05 | 0.01 |
| Female × Traditional/secular | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| Female × Survival/self-expression | –0.00 | 0.04 | –0.01 | 0.07 | –0.03 |
|
| |||||
| σ2 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.72 |
| LR test (Prob[ > | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ICC | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.14 |
Coefficients are reported. Estimations have also been controlled by waves. These results have been omitted to improve presentation, but they are available on request. ICC, intra-class correlation index. ***, **, and * explanatory variables are statistically significant at 99, 95, and 90% levels.
aVariable of reference.
bThe Wald endogeneity test was estimated. There is no empirical evidence of endogeneity.