| Literature DB >> 36081711 |
Xiaoying Ning1, Yanfei Zhang1, Wei Wang1, Huling Yan1.
Abstract
Vitiligo is a common depigmenting skin disease with profound psychosocial impacts. Depression is one of the most common mental distress. Social support has a significant impact on the psychological status of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the depression and social support status of patients with vitiligo in China, and further explore the correlation between social support and depression. The outpatients with vitiligo were investigated face to face with SDS (Self-rating depression scale) and SSRS (Social support rate scale). The mean SDS score of the patients was 44.05 ± 6.76, which was significantly higher than Chinese norms (p = 0.000). Female patients, unmarried, disease at rapid progressive stage and skin lesions at the exposed site had higher SDS scores (all p < 0.05). The scores of total social support, subjective support, objective support and support availability were lower than Chinese norms (all p < 0.01), and all were negatively correlated with SDS scores (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, low social support is one of the risk factors for depression in patients with vitiligo in China. More support and acceptance should be given to the patients.Entities:
Keywords: SDS; SSRS; depression; psychosocial; social support; vitiligo
Year: 2022 PMID: 36081711 PMCID: PMC9445617 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Basic data of patients with vitiligo.
| Characteristics | N | % | |
| Gender | Men | 87 | 51.18 |
| Women | 83 | 48.82 | |
| Age (years) | 18–25 | 48 | 28.24 |
| 25–40 | 65 | 38.24 | |
| 40–60 | 50 | 29.41 | |
| >60 | 7 | 4.11 | |
| Marital status | Single | 75 | 44.12 |
| Married | 95 | 55.88 | |
|
| |||
| Junior middle school | 12 | 7.06 | |
| Junior high school | 63 | 37.06 | |
| Junior college and bachelor | 82 | 48.24 | |
| Master and doctor | 13 | 7.64 | |
|
| |||
| Civil servant | 46 | 27.06 | |
| Enterprise staff | 71 | 41.76 | |
| Students | 28 | 16.47 | |
| Other | 25 | 14.71 | |
|
| |||
| Positive | 43 | 25.29 | |
| Negative | 127 | 74.71 | |
|
| |||
| <1 | 52 | 30.59 | |
| 1–2 | 46 | 27.06 | |
| 2–5 | 35 | 20.59 | |
| >5 | 37 | 21.76 | |
|
| |||
| Yes | 123 | 72.35 | |
| No | 47 | 27.65 | |
|
| |||
| Mild | 107 | 62.94 | |
| Moderate | 38 | 22.35 | |
| Moderate to severe | 21 | 12.35 | |
| Severe | 4 | 2.36 | |
|
| |||
| Rapid progress | 34 | 20.00 | |
| Progressive | 94 | 55.29 | |
| Stable | 42 | 24.71 | |
Univariate analysis of patients with vitiligo in the score of SDS (mean ± SD).
| Variables | SDS |
|
|
|
| |||
| Female | 46.46 ± 6.76 | 4.834 | 0.000 |
| Male | 41.75 ± 5.94 | ||
|
| |||
| 18–25 | 44.79 ± 6.65 | 0.756 | 0.520 |
| 25–40 | 43.06 ± 7.06 | ||
| 40–60 | 44.52 ± 6.80 | ||
| >60 | 44.71 ± 3.82 | ||
|
| |||
| Single | 46.12 ± 6.80 | 3.683 | 0.000 |
| Married | 42.41 ± 6.30 | ||
|
| |||
| Junior middle school | 43.50 ± 7.91 | 2.348 | 0.074 |
| Junior high school | 44.89 ± 6.66 | ||
| Junior college and bachelor | 44.20 ± 6.18 | ||
| Master and doctor | 39.54 ± 8.53 | ||
|
| |||
| Civil servant | 44.04 ± 6.01 | 1.113 | 0.346 |
| Enterprise staff | 44.79 ± 6.91 | ||
| Students | 44.07 ± 7.50 | ||
| Other | 41.92 ± 6.73 | ||
|
| |||
| Rapid progress | 48.38 ± 4.02 | 10.128 | 0.000 |
| Progressive | 43.31 ± 6.88 | ||
| Stable | 42.19 ± 6.90 | ||
|
| |||
| Yes | 44.63 ± 7.13 | 2.044 | 0.043 |
| No | 42.53 ± 5.47 | ||
| Family history | |||
| Positive | 45.37 ± 6.24 | 1.493 | 0.137 |
| Negative | 43.60 ± 6.89 | ||
|
| |||
| <1 | 44.38 ± 6.76 | 0.433 | 0.730 |
| 1–2 | 43.46 ± 7.90 | ||
| 2–5 | 44.91 ± 5.06 | ||
| >5 | 43.49 ± 6.77 | ||
|
| |||
| Mild | 43.42 ± 7.13 | 1.650 | 0.180 |
| Moderate | 45.21 ± 5.31 | ||
| Moderate to severe | 44.05 ± 6.76 | ||
| Severe | 49.75 ± 6.95 |
Comparison between social support scores in patients with vitiligo and Chinese norms (mean ± SD).
| Variables | Patients | Chinese norms |
|
|
| Social support | 39.22 ± 7.23 | 44.34 ± 8.38 | 9.238 | 0.000 |
| Subjective support | 22.45 ± 5.06 | 23.81 ± 4.75 | 3.512 | 0.001 |
| Objective support | 9.25 ± 2.77 | 12.68 ± 3.47 | 16.166 | 0.000 |
| Support availability | 7.52 ± 1.73 | 9.38 ± 2.40 | 13.956 | 0.000 |
Correlation analysis between patients’ social support and SDS score.
| Variables | SDS | |
| Social support | R | –0.495 |
|
| 0.000 | |
| Subjective support | R | –0.405 |
|
| 0.000 | |
| Objective support | R | –0.363 |
|
| 0.000 | |
| Support availability | R | –0.303 |
|
| 0.000 | |