Literature DB >> 36081524

Dexamethasone, but Not Vitamin D or A, Dampens the Inflammatory Neutrophil Response to Protect At-risk COVID-19 Patients.

Florianne M J Hafkamp1, Sanne Mol1,2, Iris Waqué1, Esther C De Jong1.   

Abstract

Dexamethasone (DEX) was the first drug shown to save lives of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients suffering from respiratory distress. A hyperactivated state of neutrophils was found in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID pneumonia cases. Given the beneficial effects of DEX in COVID-19 patients, we investigated the effects of DEX and of other immunomodulatory drugs vitamin D3 (VD3) and retinoic acid (RA) on neutrophil function. DEX, but not VD3 or RA, significantly inhibited all tested aspects of neutrophil function, e.g., degranulation, intracellular ROS production, CXCL8 release and NETosis. Interestingly, RA displayed the opposite effect by significantly increasing both CXCL8 and NET release by neutrophils. Taken together, these data suggest that the lower COVID-19 mortality in DEX-treated patients may in part be due to the dampening effect of DEX on the inflammatory neutrophil response, which could prevent neutrophil plugs with NETS in the lungs and other inflamed organs of patients.
Copyright © 2022. The Korean Association of Immunologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Dexamethasone; Neutrophils; Retinoic acid; Vitamin D3

Year:  2022        PMID: 36081524      PMCID: PMC9433192          DOI: 10.4110/in.2022.22.e36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immune Netw        ISSN: 1598-2629            Impact factor:   5.851


INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was officially declared a global pandemic in March 2020 by the World Health Organization (1), with currently over 353 million confirmed cases and 5.6 million associated deaths (2). While the majority of COVID-19 patients is asymptomatic or shows mild symptoms, one-fifth of patients will develop severe illness, symptoms including acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis and multiorgan failure (3). An elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been identified as an early risk factor for severe COVID-19 (4). Severe COVID-19 is characterized by a cytokine storm, to which pro-inflammatory monocytes and neutrophils contribute (5). Neutrophils in the lungs are both enriched and in a hyperactivated state, with upregulated IL-1β and CXCL8 expression, in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID pneumonia cases (5). Neutrophil plugs with NETs were notably present in the lungs and other inflamed organs such as the heart, kidney and brain of deceased COVID-19 patients, affirming an elevated activation status of neutrophils (67). Therefore, targeting the excessive neutrophil inflammatory response could be a crucial step in lowering the probability of progression to severe respiratory distress and eventually organ failure in COVID-19 patients. Dexamethasone (DEX), an inexpensive and commonly applied corticosteroid, was the first drug shown to save lives of people suffering from severe COVID-19 in a large randomized, controlled trial (89). The effect of DEX was most pronounced in patients on ventilators amongst whom deaths were reduced by one-third (10). In contrast, no effect was observed in people without respiratory distress. Therefore, treatment guidelines recommend administration of DEX only in hospitalized patients who require supplemental oxygen. DEX is regarded as a potent general immunosuppressive drug (8), which reduces CXCL8 and TNF expression in neutrophils (1112). How DEX affects other aspects of neutrophil function is less well-known. In addition to DEX, vitamin D3 (VD3) supplementation has been proposed as a beneficial strategy to reduce the impact of COVID (13). Furthermore, it has been suggested that retinoic acid (RA) metabolism is defective during the COVID-19 cytokine storm, which causes excessive cytokine release (1415). Hence, RA supplementation could also be considered for treatment. However, little is known about the effects of these immunosuppressive drugs on neutrophil function. Therefore, we investigated the effects of DEX, VD3 and RA on function of human neutrophils by determining degranulation, CXCL8 release and intracellular ROS production upon stimulation with TLR7/8 ligand Resiquimod (R848) (16) and TNF. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of these drugs on PMA-induced NETosis. We found that DEX dampens all aspects of neutrophil function assessed in this study. In contrast, VD3 did not affect function. Interestingly, RA did not alter degranulation and ROS production, but increased CXCL8 release and NETosis. Taken together, these data support a potential neutrophil dampening role for DEX, thereby providing a rationale for the use of DEX in treatment of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Neutrophil isolation

Blood was collected from healthy volunteer donors after informed consent. The blood collection protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Amsterdam Medical Centre (METC 2015_074). Neutrophils were isolated using a density gradient followed by erythrocyte lysis, as previously described (17). Neutrophils were then resuspended in IMDM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated (HI) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone; Thermo sFisher Scientific Inc.) and gentamycin (86 µg/ml; Duchefa Biochemie B.V., Haarlem, The Netherlands) and used immediately. Neutrophil purity was analyzed by flow cytometry and was always >97%.

Neutrophil culture, stimulation and flow cytometric analysis

Neutrophils were seeded at a density of 0.5×106 cells/ml in 200 µl in a flat bottom 96-well plate (Costar, Corning Inc. Corning, NY) in IMDM medium containing 10% HI-FBS and gentamycin. Subsequently, neutrophils were pretreated for 30 minutes with DEX (40 nM; #D2915 from Merck), VD3 (2.5 µM; #17936 from Sigma-Aldrich), RA (10 µM; #R2625 from Sigma-Aldrich), or controls medium, ethanol or DMSO, respectively. Then R848 (1 µg/ml; Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA) and TNF (1 ng/ml; Miltenyi Biotec GmBH, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) were added and neutrophils were cultured for 2 hours (degranulation), or 24 hours at 37°C. 24-hour culture supernatants were collected for the analysis of neutrophil CXCL8 release, by ELISA (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Breda, The Netherlands), as described previously (17). For assessment of ROS production, neutrophils were stimulated for 1 hour with R848 (500 ng/ml) and TNF (250 pg/ml) in the presence of 250 nM 123-dihydrorhodamine (123-DHR; Marker Gene Technologies, OR, USA), after 15 minutes pretreatment with drugs or controls. For flow cytometric analysis of CD16, CD63, and CD66b cells were washed after stimulation, stained and analyzed as previously described (17).

NETosis assay

NETosis was analyzed using an Incucyte S3 Live-Cell Analysis System (Essen BioScience, Newark, UK) and a previously described IncuCyte® NETosis assay (18). Briefly, neutrophils were seeded at a density of 1.0×105 cells/ml in 200 µl in a 96-well IncuCyte® Imagelock plate (Essen BioScience) in IMDM medium containing 10% HI-FBS and gentamycin, and incubated for 15 minutes in the presence of DEX (40 nM), VD3 (2.5 µM) or RA (10 µM) or controls medium, ethanol or DMSO, respectively. 1.5 ng/ml PMA was added after 15 minutes and neutrophils were incubated for 12 hours in presence of the cell impermeant nucleic acid binding dye YOYO™-3 Iodide (Invitrogen). Neutrophils were imaged every 15 minutes using phase contrast and red fluorescent exposure channels, using a 20× dry objective lens. Data were analyzed using the IncuCyte Basic Software (Essen BioScience), with the same parameters as previously described (17).

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as mean. Statistical analysis was done in GraphPad Prism version 9.1.0 for Windows by using statistical tests, depending on the experimental data. The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to test normality of data. For multiple comparisons, p-values were calculated on selected pairs (drug versus vehicle control) using a one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak’s post hoc correction on raw data. For single comparisons, p-values were calculated using two-tailed paired t-tests. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Neutrophil degranulation is dampened by DEX, but not VD3 or RA

A hyperinflammatory response of neutrophils is associated with severe COVID-19 (19). Since drugs that dampen neutrophil activation may be useful in fighting SARS-CoV-2 infection, we studied whether DEX, VD3 or RA affect neutrophil degranulation by analyzing CD16 (FCγRIII), CD63 and CD66b membrane expression. Fusion of azurophilic granules with the plasma membrane increases CD63 expression, while CD66b indicates specific and gelatinase granules (2021), and CD16 is cleaved from the surface upon the release of secretory vesicles (20212223). Neutrophils were stimulated with R848 and TNF, a mimic for viral activation, in the presence of DEX, VD3, RA or relevant controls (medium, ethanol or DMSO, respectively) and we titrated the drugs to determine the used concentration in all experiments (Supplementary Fig. 1). Data were obtained by flow cytometry and were analyzed with the gating strategy shown in Fig. 1A. Exposure of stimulated neutrophils to DEX, resulted in significant inhibition of CD16 cleavage from the membrane, while this was not affected by VD3 and RA compared to vehicle controls (Fig. 1B). Furthermore, DEX significantly decreased CD63 expression (Fig. 1C), while none of the immunomodulatory drugs affected CD66b membrane expression (Fig. 1D). Ethanol alone reduced CD16 cleavage and CD63 expression (Supplementary Fig. 1, Fig. 1B and C). These data indicate that DEX predominantly dampens degranulation of azurophilic granules (CD63) and secretory vesicles (CD16), rather than specific and gelatinase granules. Taken together, our study is the first to demonstrate that neutrophil degranulation is restricted by DEX, while VD3 an RA have no effect on degranulation. Administration of DEX to hospitalized COVID-19 patients may reduce hyperinflammatory neutrophil degranulation.
Figure 1

Neutrophil degranulation is dampened by DEX, but not VD3 or RA. Neutrophils were pretreated with DEX, VD3, RA or their respective controls medium, ethanol or DMSO (all controls abbreviated as C in figures), and cultured for 2 hours in the presence of R848 and TNF. (A) Flow cytometry plot demonstrating gating strategy to determine neutrophil degranulation. Neutrophils were gated on forward scatter (FSC-A) and side scatter (SSC-A), followed by a single cell and live gate from which the expression of CD16, CD63 and CD66b was assessed (B) Secretory vesicle degranulation as measured by percentage of CD16- neutrophils is depicted. (C) Azurophilic degranulation as measured by percentage of CD63+ neutrophils is shown. (D) Degranulation of specific and gelatinase granules is depicted as mean fluorescence intensity of CD66b. Data are representative of 7 independent experiments and are presented as mean ± SD.

**p<0.01.

Neutrophil degranulation is dampened by DEX, but not VD3 or RA. Neutrophils were pretreated with DEX, VD3, RA or their respective controls medium, ethanol or DMSO (all controls abbreviated as C in figures), and cultured for 2 hours in the presence of R848 and TNF. (A) Flow cytometry plot demonstrating gating strategy to determine neutrophil degranulation. Neutrophils were gated on forward scatter (FSC-A) and side scatter (SSC-A), followed by a single cell and live gate from which the expression of CD16, CD63 and CD66b was assessed (B) Secretory vesicle degranulation as measured by percentage of CD16- neutrophils is depicted. (C) Azurophilic degranulation as measured by percentage of CD63+ neutrophils is shown. (D) Degranulation of specific and gelatinase granules is depicted as mean fluorescence intensity of CD66b. Data are representative of 7 independent experiments and are presented as mean ± SD.

**p<0.01.

CXCL8 release is dampened by DEX and strengthened by RA

During infection neutrophils release many different mediators, including CXCL8 which is an important chemoattractant for neutrophils (222425). We analyzed the release of CXCL8 after 24 hour-stimulation with R848 and TNF. In line with previous reports (11), CXCL8 release by neutrophils in presence of DEX was decreased by approximately 50%, with an average of 1.02±0.52 ng/ml (mean ± SD) CXCL8 release by DEX-treated neutrophils versus 2.24±1.14 ng/ml by medium control neutrophils (Fig. 2). Surprisingly, RA significantly increased CXCL8 release by stimulated neutrophils by 1.5-fold, whereas VD3 did not influence CXCL8 release (Fig. 2). This RA-induced effect on neutrophil function was not found for degranulation. CXCL8 is synthesized de novo upon activation and is thus regulated differently than degranulation, where granules are already pre-stored in the neutrophils and rapidly released within two hours. This could underlie the variable effects of RA on different aspects of neutrophil function. The opposite effects of RA and DEX on CXCL8 release by neutrophils could be due to opposite effects on NF-κB activity. NF-κB transcription factors are the main regulators of CXCL8 transcription (2627). Corticosteroids, including DEX, inhibit CXCL8 transcription via repression of NF-κB activity (27). Reduced expression of NF-κB transcription factors by DEX was confirmed in human neutrophils (28). Elevated CXCL8 secretion upon RA treatment is possibly due to increased NF-κB activity, which was shown in human keratinocytes (26). However, to our knowledge, increased CXCL8 release by RA was not previously shown in neutrophils. Collectively, our data show that similar to degranulation, CXCL8 release is dampened by DEX and VD3 had no effect. Interestingly, RA increased CXCL8 secretion, whereas no effect of RA was observed on neutrophil degranulation.
Figure 2

CXCL8 release by neutrophils is affected by DEX and RA. Neutrophils were stimulated by R848 and TNF and in the presence of DEX, VD3, RA or relevant controls. CXCL8 was measured in 24-hour culture supernatants (n=7). Data are shown presented as mean ± SD relative to controls.

*p<0.05, **p< 0.01.

CXCL8 release by neutrophils is affected by DEX and RA. Neutrophils were stimulated by R848 and TNF and in the presence of DEX, VD3, RA or relevant controls. CXCL8 was measured in 24-hour culture supernatants (n=7). Data are shown presented as mean ± SD relative to controls.

*p<0.05, **p< 0.01.

ROS production is reduced by DEX

In addition to degranulation and CXCL8 secretion, neutrophil ROS production is important in the clearance of unwanted pathogens (29). However, it has been suggested that excessive ROS production by neutrophils during COVID-19 exacerbates the host immunopathological response resulting in tissue damage (30). Intracellular ROS production was determined by flow cytometry using the ROS indicator 123-DHR in R848/TNF-stimulated neutrophils in the absence or presence of DEX, VD3 or RA (Fig. 3A). Similar to neutrophil degranulation and CXCL8 release, intracellular ROS production was significantly reduced in neutrophils exposed to DEX. Accordingly, neutrophils from human volunteers injected with DEX were shown to exhibit lower extracellular ROS generation (31). In contrast, neutrophils stimulated in the presence of RA or VD3 showed no difference in ROS production compared to neutrophils stimulated with relevant controls, neither when assessing the percentage of intracellular ROS+ cells or the mean fluorescence intensity of neutrophils (Fig. 3B and C). RA was previously shown to increase N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-fenylalanine (fMLF)-stimulated production of intracellular ROS (32), but we did not find an effect on intracellular ROS production, which could be stimulus-dependent. We used a double stimulus rather than a single stimulus for optimal neutrophil activation, which is more physiologically relevant than single stimuli given that cells encounter a plethora of pro-inflammatory cytokines and microbial or viral components (17). Our data indicate that DEX restricts ROS production in neutrophils, again demonstrating anti-inflammatory potential of DEX on neutrophil functions.
Figure 3

ROS production in neutrophils is reduced by DEX, but not VD3 or RA. Neutrophils were incubated for 1 hour in the presence of 123-DHR and activated by R848 and TNF, in the presence of DEX, VD3, RA or relevant controls. ROS production was analyzed using flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow cytometry image of neutrophils incubated with DEX or relevant control. (B-C) Effects of DEX, VD3 and RA on ROS production (n=11). (B) Intracellular ROS generation is expressed as percentage of ROS+ cells. (C) Total ROS production is expressed as mean fluorescence intensity of 123-DHR relative to controls, with mean fluorescence intensity 6,166±3,636 (mean ± SD) medium control, 4,252±3,103 ethanol control and 5,998±5,398 DMSO control. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

**p<0.01; ***p<0.005.

ROS production in neutrophils is reduced by DEX, but not VD3 or RA. Neutrophils were incubated for 1 hour in the presence of 123-DHR and activated by R848 and TNF, in the presence of DEX, VD3, RA or relevant controls. ROS production was analyzed using flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow cytometry image of neutrophils incubated with DEX or relevant control. (B-C) Effects of DEX, VD3 and RA on ROS production (n=11). (B) Intracellular ROS generation is expressed as percentage of ROS+ cells. (C) Total ROS production is expressed as mean fluorescence intensity of 123-DHR relative to controls, with mean fluorescence intensity 6,166±3,636 (mean ± SD) medium control, 4,252±3,103 ethanol control and 5,998±5,398 DMSO control. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

**p<0.01; ***p<0.005.

DEX reduces and RA increases NETosis

NETosis is a mechanism used by neutrophils to entrap and kill pathogens through the release of nuclear and granular content that forms a network (33). Although NETosis is important as an antimicrobial function, it requires tight regulation, since excessive NETosis can lead to severe tissue damage and exacerbation of inflammation (3435). Neutrophil plugs with NETs were found in deceased COVID-19 patients and NET quantity correlates to disease severity (6736). To examine whether DEX, VD3 or RA could dampen NETosis in neutrophils, neutrophils were incubated with 1.5 ng/ml PMA in the absence or presence of DEX, VD3 or RA. With time-lapse immunofluorescence microscopy we analyzed NETosis (Fig. 4A). Maximal NETosis was observed after 4 hours of PMA-stimulation, which was significantly reduced by DEX. VD3 did not have any effect on NETosis, while NETosis was increased by RA (Fig. 4B and C). Reduced NET release in presence of DEX was reported upon stimulation of neutrophils with Staphylococcus aureus, but not with PMA (37). However, we used a 20-fold lower dose of PMA, possibly allowing DEX to interfere with NETosis. RA was previously shown to enhance both PMA- and fMLF-induced NETosis (32). Similar to CXCL8 release, we observed opposite effects of RA and DEX on NETosis. It has been shown that inhibition of the NF-κB pathway reduces NETosis (38). Hence, the differential effects of RA and DEX on NF-κB activity could underlie their observed effects on NETosis. Moreover, peptidyl arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4) plays a critical role in the formation of NETs (39) and it has been shown that corticosteroid treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients decreases synovial expression of PAD4 (40), indicating that DEX may affect PAD4 expression in neutrophils. In contrast, treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia cells with RA, to differentiate them into granulocytic cells, increases PAD4 expression (41). Taken together, distinct effects of DEX and RA on NF-κB and PAD4 activity could underlie the opposing effects of these drugs on NETosis.
Figure 4

DEX reduces, while RA increases NETosis. Neutrophils were stimulated for 12 hours with PMA (1.5 ng/ml) in the presence of DEX, VD3, RA or relevant controls as well as a cell impermeable fluorescent DNA-binding dye. Fluorescence was measured by time-lapse immunofluorescence microscopy every 15 minutes to determine NETosis. (A) Overlays of phase contrast and fluorescence images showing accessible DNA in red, and extracellular DNA (>400 µm2) in blue (NETs). Images are representative of 5 independent experiments. (B) NETosis was determined as fluorescence signal area in µm2 per well shown in a 12-hour time course. Only areas larger than 400 µm2 were used for calculations (n=5). Data are presented as mean. (C) Normalized NETosis expressed as total fluorescence area divided by cell confluence after 4 hours of stimulation is depicted (n=5). Data are presented as mean ± SD.

*p<0.05.

DEX reduces, while RA increases NETosis. Neutrophils were stimulated for 12 hours with PMA (1.5 ng/ml) in the presence of DEX, VD3, RA or relevant controls as well as a cell impermeable fluorescent DNA-binding dye. Fluorescence was measured by time-lapse immunofluorescence microscopy every 15 minutes to determine NETosis. (A) Overlays of phase contrast and fluorescence images showing accessible DNA in red, and extracellular DNA (>400 µm2) in blue (NETs). Images are representative of 5 independent experiments. (B) NETosis was determined as fluorescence signal area in µm2 per well shown in a 12-hour time course. Only areas larger than 400 µm2 were used for calculations (n=5). Data are presented as mean. (C) Normalized NETosis expressed as total fluorescence area divided by cell confluence after 4 hours of stimulation is depicted (n=5). Data are presented as mean ± SD.

*p<0.05. In this study, we confirmed the well-established anti-inflammatory effect of DEX on CXCL8 release (1112) and importantly, we show that this dampening effect of DEX extends to other aspects of neutrophil function, including intracellular ROS production, degranulation and NETosis. We observed no effects of VD3 on neutrophil function when compared to the vehicle control (ethanol), while neutrophils do express mRNA of the VD3 receptor (42). The effects of VD3 on neutrophils are rarely studied and results are contradictory, e.g. elevated versus decreased CXCL8 release by VD3 treatment (43). A limitation of our study is that we did not use (pseudo)-SARS-CoV-2 as stimulus for neutrophils. Although neutrophils may not be infected by SARS-CoV-2 (44), its components, e.g. nucleocapsid, spike proteins or ssRNA, may activate neutrophils. Purified nucleocapsid and spike proteins from SARS-CoV-2 were shown to induce NETosis, while they did not increase intracellular ROS production (45). The effect of these proteins on the release of other neutrophil derived factors, e.g., granules and CXCL8, remains to be established. Here, we used R848 in combination with TNF to activate neutrophils. Our earlier work showed that two different stimuli are needed for optimal neutrophil activation (17). R848 is a synthetic ligand that activates TLR7 and TLR8, the latter expressed by neutrophils, which recognize ssRNA (46). TNF is an important modulator of immune responses, including the response to viruses. Therefore, neutrophil stimulation with R848 and TNF may represent an attractive model to study candidate drugs for dampening neutrophil activation in COVID-19. Taken together, our data support previous reports on a pro-inflammatory effect of RA on neutrophils and this may be of importance to treatment of neutrophil immunodeficiencies (47), while caution is warranted for potential use as a tolerogenic adjuvant in autoimmune disorders or other diseases associated with hyperactivation of neutrophils, such as COVID-19 (194348). The anti-inflammatory effect of DEX on neutrophil function supports the use of DEX in hospitalized COVID-19 patients suffering from respiratory distress.
  46 in total

1.  Reduced glucocorticoid receptor expression and function in airway neutrophils.

Authors:  Jonathan Plumb; Kate Gaffey; Binita Kane; Brendan Malia-Milanes; Rajesh Shah; Andrew Bentley; David Ray; Dave Singh
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.932

2.  Mechanisms of degranulation in neutrophils.

Authors:  Paige Lacy
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.406

3.  TNF-alpha-induced transendothelial neutrophil migration is IL-8 dependent.

Authors:  S J Smart; T B Casale
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-03

4.  A High-Throughput Real-Time Imaging Technique To Quantify NETosis and Distinguish Mechanisms of Cell Death in Human Neutrophils.

Authors:  Sarthak Gupta; Diana W Chan; Kristien J Zaal; Mariana J Kaplan
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Decreased anti-inflammatory responses to vitamin D in neonatal neutrophils.

Authors:  Daniel Hirsch; Faith E Archer; Meera Joshi-Kale; Anna M Vetrano; Barry Weinberger
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.711

6.  Local administration of glucocorticoids decreases synovial citrullination in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Dimitrios Makrygiannakis; Shankar Revu; Marianne Engström; Erik af Klint; Anthony P Nicholas; Ger Jm Pruijn; Anca I Catrina
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 7.  Neutrophils: Between host defence, immune modulation, and tissue injury.

Authors:  Philipp Kruger; Mona Saffarzadeh; Alexander N R Weber; Nikolaus Rieber; Markus Radsak; Horst von Bernuth; Charaf Benarafa; Dirk Roos; Julia Skokowa; Dominik Hartl
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Tissue damage from neutrophil-induced oxidative stress in COVID-19.

Authors:  Mireille Laforge; Carole Elbim; Corinne Frère; Miryana Hémadi; Charbel Massaad; Philippe Nuss; Jean-Jacques Benoliel; Chrystel Becker
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 9.  Neutrophils to the ROScue: Mechanisms of NADPH Oxidase Activation and Bacterial Resistance.

Authors:  Giang T Nguyen; Erin R Green; Joan Mecsas
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Peter Horby; Wei Shen Lim; Jonathan R Emberson; Marion Mafham; Jennifer L Bell; Louise Linsell; Natalie Staplin; Christopher Brightling; Andrew Ustianowski; Einas Elmahi; Benjamin Prudon; Christopher Green; Timothy Felton; David Chadwick; Kanchan Rege; Christopher Fegan; Lucy C Chappell; Saul N Faust; Thomas Jaki; Katie Jeffery; Alan Montgomery; Kathryn Rowan; Edmund Juszczak; J Kenneth Baillie; Richard Haynes; Martin J Landray
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.