| Literature DB >> 36081468 |
Sayo Hamatani1,2,3,4, Kazuki Matsumoto4,5, Tomoaki Ishibashi6, Ryunosuke Shibukawa6, Yuki Honda6, Hirotaka Kosaka1,2,3,6, Yoshifumi Mizuno1,2,3, Gerhard Andersson7,8.
Abstract
Background: The process of cultural adaptation of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) programs for bulimia nervosa (BN) have rarely been reported despite the potential influence of cultural adaptation of psychosocial interventions on therapeutic response. Aim: This study aimed to illustrate development process of an ICBT program for Japanese women with bulimia nervosa (BN).Entities:
Keywords: bulimia nervosa (BN); cultural adaptation; cultural sensitivity; ecological validity; internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT)
Year: 2022 PMID: 36081468 PMCID: PMC9446753 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.942936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
Characteristics of participants.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Age, mean (SD) | 30.6 (11.4) | 36.1 (7.5) |
| Years of educations, mean (SD) | 12.8 (1.1) | 19.1 (2.2) |
| Married, | 2 (40.0) | 5 (71.4) |
| Females, | 5 (100) | 2 (28.6) |
| Body Mass Index, mean (SD) | 19.1 (3.1) | - |
Results of CRQ.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.60 | 0.37 | 4.76 | 0.25 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.60 | 0.55 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.43 | 0.53 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.53 | 0.30 | 4.86 | 0.26 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.60 | 0.55 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.14 | 0.69 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.60 | 0.43 | 4.95 | 0.13 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.60 | 0.55 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.43 | 0.53 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.73 | 0.37 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 5.00 | 0.00 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.71 | 0.49 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.60 | 0.28 | 4.86 | 0.26 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.71 | 0.49 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.87 | 0.18 | 4.86 | 0.26 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 5.00 | 0.00 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.80 | 0.30 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 5.00 | 0 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.73 | 0.37 | 4.95 | 0.13 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 5.00 | 0.00 | 4.57 | 0.53 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.60 | 0.43 | 4.90 | 0.16 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.71 | 0.49 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.67 | 0.33 | 4.95 | 0.13 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.71 | 0.76 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.73 | 0.37 | 4.95 | 0.13 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 5.00 | 0.00 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.60 | 0.55 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.67 | 0.47 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 5.00 | 0.00 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
|
| ||||
| Functional equivalence | 4.67 | 0.47 | 4.91 | 0.25 |
| Conceptual equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
| Linguistic equivalence | 4.80 | 0.45 | 4.86 | 0.38 |
M, mean; SD, standard deviation.