| Literature DB >> 36080336 |
Cristina Cachán-Vega1,2, Ignacio Vega-Naredo1,2,3, Yaiza Potes1,2,3, Juan Carlos Bermejo-Millo1,2,3, Adrian Rubio-González1,2,3, Claudia García-González1,2, Eduardo Antuña1,2, Manuel Bermúdez2,4, José Gutiérrez-Rodríguez2,4, José Antonio Boga2, Ana Coto-Montes1,2,3, Beatriz Caballero1,2,3.
Abstract
Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is altered during aging and under different neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases. Melatonin shows neurogenic and neuroprotective properties during aging and neuropathological conditions. In this study, we evaluated the effects of chronic treatment with melatonin on different markers of neurodegeneration and hippocampal neurogenesis using immunohistochemistry in the aged and neurodegenerative brains of SAMP8 mice, which is an animal model of accelerated senescence that mimics aging-related Alzheimer's pathology. Neurodegenerative processes observed in the brains of aged SAMP8 mice at 10 months of age include the presence of damaged neurons, disorganization in the layers of the brain cortex, alterations in neural processes and the length of neuronal prolongations and β-amyloid accumulation in the cortex and hippocampus. This neurodegeneration may be associated with neurogenic responses in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of these mice, since we observed a neurogenic niche of neural stem and progenitor/precursors cells in the hippocampus of SAMP8 mice. However, hippocampal neurogenesis seems to be compromised due to alterations in the cell survival, migration and/or neuronal maturation of neural precursor cells due to the neurodegeneration levels in these mice. Chronic treatment with melatonin for 9 months decreased these neurodegenerative processes and the neurodegeneration-induced neurogenic response. Noticeably, melatonin also induced recovery in the functionality of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in aged SAMP8 mice.Entities:
Keywords: adult hippocampal neurogenesis; aging; melatonin; neurodegeneration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080336 PMCID: PMC9457692 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1β-Tubulin III immunostaining in the brain cortex of SAMP8 control mice (a,c,e) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (b,d,f). Asterisks show neurons under neurodegeneration (dark neurons). Arrows note neuronal prolongations in cells positive for β-Tubulin III. I, the molecular layer; II, the outer granular layer; III, the outer pyramidal layer; IV; the inner granular layer; V, the inner pyramidal layer; VI, the polymorph layer. (g) Bar chart shows quantification of the DAB signal with respect to the total number of nuclei at 400× magnifications (in percentages with respect to control). (h) Frequency of cortical cells positive for β-Tubulin III with evident neural processes. (i) Length of neural prolongations in cortical cells positive for β-Tubulin III. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. control. Statistical analysis was always performed in 10 images obtained from each SAMP8 control mice (n = 4) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (n = 4).
Figure 2β-Amyloid (1-42) immunostaining in the cortex of SAMP8 control mice (a,c) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (b,d). Bar chart (e) shows quantification of the DAB signal with respect to the total number of nuclei at 400× magnifications (in percentages with respect to the control). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 vs. control. Statistical analysis was always performed in 10 images obtained from each control mice (n = 4) and mice treated with melatonin (n = 4).
Figure 3β-Amyloid (1-42) immunostaining in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of SAMP8 control mice (a,c) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (b,d). Bar chart (e) shows quantification of the DAB signal with respect to the total number of nuclei at 400× magnifications (in percentages with respect to the control). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 vs. control. ML, the molecular layer; GNL, the granule neurons layer; SGZ, the subgranular zone. Statistical analysis was always performed in 10 images obtained from each control mice (n = 4) and mice treated with melatonin (n = 4).
Figure 4Markers of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of SAMP8 control mice (a,d,g) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (b,e,h). Bar charts (c,f,i) show quantification of the DAB signal with respect to the total number of nuclei at 400× magnifications (in percentages with respect to the control). Data are always expressed as means ± SEM. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 vs. control. ML, the molecular layer; GNL, the granule neurons layer; SGZ, the subgranular zone. Statistical analysis was always performed in 10 images obtained from each SAMP8 control mice (n = 4) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (n = 4).
Figure 5β-Tubulin III immunostaining in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of SAMP8 mice at 400× magnifications. The small box shows details of hilar neurons in control mice (a) and melatonin-treated mice (b) at 1000× magnifications. GNL, the granule neurons layer; SGZ, the subgranular zone. (c) Frequency of hilar cells positive for β-Tubulin III with evident neural processes were calculated at 400× magnifications (d) Length of neural prolongations in hilar cells positive for β-Tubulin III were measured at 400× magnifications. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. *** p < 0.001 vs. control. Statistical analysis was always performed in 10 images obtained from each SAMP8 control mice (n = 4) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (n = 4).
Figure 6β-Tubulin III immunostaining in the granule neurons layer of the hippocampus of SAMP8 control mice (a,c) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (b,d) at 1000× magnifications. The arrows note possible newly created post-mitotic neurons. GNL, the granule neurons layer; SGZ, the subgranular zone. (e) Bar chart shows quantification of cells positive for β-Tubulin III in the GNL and SGZ of the hippocampus (in percentages with respect to the control). (f) Bar chart shows quantification of the total number of nuclei (nuclei volume) in the GNL and SGZ of the hippocampus. Data are always expressed as means ± SEM. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001 versus control. Statistical analysis was always performed in 10 images obtained from each SAMP8 control mice (n = 4) and SAMP8 mice treated with melatonin (n = 4).
Figure 7Dimensional representation of the PCA analysis showing the two main components found.
Descriptive analysis of the rotated component loadings observed after applying a PCA *.
| Component 1 | Component 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| β-Amyloid (1-42) |
| 0.023 |
| Nestin | 0.504 |
|
| TBR-2 | −0.011 |
|
| NeuroD1 |
| 0.239 |
| β-Tubulin III |
| 0.136 |
* The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.619; Bartlett’s test of Sphericity showed a significant p-value = 0.000.
Correlations matrix among all the variables included in the PCA.
| β-Amyloid (1-42) | Nestin | TBR-2 | NeuroD1 | β-Tubulin III | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation * | β-Amyloid (1-42) | 1 |
| 0.098 |
|
|
| Nestin |
| 1 |
|
|
| |
| TBR-2 | 0.098 |
| 1 | 0.188 | 0.140 | |
| NeuroD1 |
|
| 0.188 | 1 |
| |
| β-Tubulin III |
|
| 0.140 |
| 1 | |
| β-Amyloid (1-42) | - |
| 0.333 |
|
| |
| Nestin |
| - |
|
|
| |
| TBR-2 | 0.333 |
| - | 0.201 | 0.268 | |
| NeuroD1 |
|
| 0.201 | - |
| |
| β-Tubulin III |
|
| 0.268 |
| - |
* Significant Pearson’s correlations are shown in bold; significant p-values are shown in italics.
Primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry analyses.
| Name | Code | Company |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-β-Tubulin III (TUBB3) | T2200 | Sigma-Aldrich |
| β-Amyloid (1-42) (D9A3A) | #14974 | Cell Signaling |
| Anti-Nestin | N5413 | Sigma-Aldrich |
| Anti-TBR-2 | #ABN1687 | Millipore |
| Anti-NeuroD1 | #ABE991 | Millipore |