| Literature DB >> 36080245 |
Mirza Nadeem Ahmad1, Sohail Nadeem2, Mohsin Javed2, Shahid Iqbal3, Sadaf Ul Hassan2, Samar O Aljazzar4, Eslam B Elkaeed5, Rami Adel Pashameah6, Eman Alzahrani7, Abd-ElAziem Farouk8, Mohammed T Alotaibi9, Hisham S M Abd-Rabboh10,11.
Abstract
The synthesis of MMT and poly(o-anisidine) (MMT/POA) clay nanocomposites was carried out by using the chemical oxidative polymerization of POA and MMT clay with POA, respectively. By maintaining the constant concentration of POA, different percentage loads of MMT clay were used to determine the effect of MMT clay on the properties of POA. The interaction between POA and MMT clay was investigated by FTIR spectroscopy, and, to reveal the complete compactness and homogeneous distribution of MMT clay in POA, were assessed by using scanning-electron-microscope (SEM) analysis. The UV-visible spectrum was studied for the optical and absorbance properties of MMT/POA ceramic nanocomposites. Furthermore, the horizontal burning test (HBT) demonstrated that clay nanofillers inhibit POA combustion.Entities:
Keywords: (poly)ortho-anisidine; HBT; MMT (montmorillonite) clay; nanocomposites; nanofiller
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080245 PMCID: PMC9457598 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Mechanism of polymerization of o-anisidine.
Scheme of nanocomposite preparation.
| Sr. No. | Monomer Poly( | APS (Ammonium | DDPA | MMT Clay | % of Filler in Composite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.0255 g | 0.456 g | 0.002555 g | 0 g | 0% |
| 2 | 0.0255 g | 0.456 g | 0.002555 g | 0.00051 g | 2% |
| 3 | 0.0255 g | 0.456 g | 0.002555 g | 0.000102 g | 4% |
| 4 | 0.0255 g | 0.456 g | 0.002555 g | 0.00153 g | 6% |
| 5 | 0.0255 g | 0.456 g | 0.002555 g | 0.00204 g | 8% |
| 6 | 0.0255 g | 0.456 g | 0.002555 g | 0.00306 g | 12% |
Figure 2FTIR spectra of: (a) POA; (b) 2% POA/MMT; (c) 4% POA/MMT; (d) 6% POA/MMT; (e) 8% POA/MMT; (f) 12% POA/MMT.
Figure 3UV–vis: (a) 2% MMT/POA; (b) 4% MMT/POA; (c) 6% MMT/POA; (d) 8% MMT/POA; (e) 12% MMT/POA.
Figure 4SEM images at different magnifications of POA (a–c), and POA with 2% MMT clay (d–f).
Figure 5SEM images at different magnifications of POA with 4% MMT clay (a–c), and POA with 12% MMT clay (d–f).
Figure 6TGA/DSC of pure POA (a,b), and MMT/POA at 6% (c,d).
The horizontal burning rates for MMT/POA nanocomposite.
| Nanocomposite | POA | 2% | 4% | 6% | 8% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burning Time/73 mm | 16 | 25 | 33 | 47 | 58 | 75 |
| HBR (mm/s) | 24 | 22 | 19 | 15 | 11 | 7 |
Figure 7The horizontal burning rate of pure POA blends with MMT clay nanofiller (2, 4, 6, 8, and 12%).
Cone-calorimeter tests on the heat and ignition characteristics of pure POA and MMT/POA nanocomposites.
| Samples | Effective Heat of Combustion, MJ kg−1 | Time to Ignition, | Flame-Out Time, s | Mean CO2 Yield, kg kg−1 | Average Mass Loss Rate (MLR), | Total Heat Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POA | 27.4 | 11 | 486 | 2.3 | 25.4 | 131.5 |
| 2% MMT/POA | 29.6 | 10 | 541 | 2.3 | 29.5 | 134.6 |
| 4% MMT/POA | 31.8 | 17 | 606 | 2.4 | 35.6 | 137.4 |
| 6% MMT/POA | 34.2 | 24 | 649 | 2.4 | 39.8 | 140.7 |
| 8% MMT/POA | 33.5 | 19 | 681 | 2.3 | 28.4 | 139.4 |
| 12% MMT/POA | 32.7 | 13 | 723 | 2.2 | 17.6 | 136.7 |