| Literature DB >> 36080224 |
Weiwei Han1, Wei Xiang1, Jun Shi1, Yue Ji1.
Abstract
Phenol is an important chemical material that is widely used in industry. Currently, phenol is dominantly produced by the well-known three-step cumene process, which suffers from severe drawbacks. Therefore, developing a green, sustainable, and economical strategy for the production of phenol directly from benzene is urgently needed. In recent years, the photocatalytic hydroxylation of benzene to phenol, which is economically feasible and could be performed under mild conditions, has attracted more attention, and development of highly efficient photocatalyst would be a key issue in this field. In this review, we systematically introduce the recent achievements of photocatalytic hydroxylation of benzene to phenol from 2015 to mid-2022, and various heterogeneous photocatalysts are comprehensively reviewed, including semiconductors, polyoxometalates (POMs), graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), carbon materials, and some other types of photocatalysts. Much effort is focused on the physical and chemical approaches for modification of these photocatalysts. The challenges and future promising directions for further enhancing the catalytic performances in photocatalytic hydroxylation of benzene are discussed in the end.Entities:
Keywords: benzene; heterogeneous photocatalysts; hydroxylation; phenol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080224 PMCID: PMC9457663 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Various types of heterogeneous photocatalysts developed for hydroxylation of benzene to phenol.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of selective recovery of phenol by layered silicic acid in photocatalytic hydroxylation of benzene in water. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [33]. 2013 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3TiO2 entrapped in the cagelike mesopores of hydrophobically modified MCF for the hydroxylation of benzene. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [34]. 2011 Elsevier.
Catalytic performance of semiconductor-based photocatalysts for benzene hydroxylation.
| Photocatalyst | Reaction Conditions | Con./% | Sel./% | Yield/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Ru(bpy)3]2+–SSA@TiO2 | Simulated solar, benzene (600 ppm), phenol (83,000 ppm), H2O, 5 h | 72 | 96 | 63.5 | [ |
| mTiO2 | λ > 320 nm, 0.02 mmol benzene, 10 mL H2O, 40 °C, 6 h | 42 | 81 | 34 | [ |
| H-MAG TiO2 | Simulated solar λ > 320 nm, aqueous benzene (20 mL H2O, saturated with O2), 42 °C, 24 h | 80 | 100 | 80 | [ |
| Na-MAG TiO2 | 80 | 28 | 22.7 | ||
| TiO2@MCF | λ > 320 nm, 29.7 mL H2O, 0.3 mL acetonitrile, 10 mmol benzene, RT, 2 h | 72 | 30.7 | 22.2 | [ |
| Au@TiO2 | Xe arc lamp λ > 400 nm, 0.07 mL benzene, 50 mL H2O, 30 °C, 3 h | 65 | 96 | 62 | [ |
| Au/TiO2 | λ > 320 nm, 60 ppm benzene, 230 Kpa CO2, 20 mL H2O, 34 °C, 24 h | 15 | 89 | 13 | [ |
| Au/TiO2 | Hg lamp (240–440 nm), 5 mL benzene, 500 mL H2O, 25 °C, 6 h | [ | |||
| Au @TiO2 | λ > 400 nm, 50 mL H2O, 0.07 mL benzene, RT, 2 h | 69 | 91 | 63 | [ |
| Pt @TiO2 | 60 | 52 | 31 | ||
| Ag@TiO2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | ||
| Aushell-Pdcore/TiO2 | UV LED light, 1 mmol/L benzene and H2O (100 mL), RT, 1 h | 30 | [ | ||
| Au/Ti0.98V0.02O2 | Hg lamp (200–400 nm), 2 mL benzene, 1 mL H2O2, 1 mL CH3CN, 25 °C, 18 h | 18 | 88.1 | 15.9 | [ |
| Pd/CeO2/TiO2 | Xe lamp λ > 420 nm, 1 g benzene, 10 mL CH3CN, benzene:H2O2 (molar ratio) = 1:5, 80 °C, 10 h | 73 | 95 | 69.4 | [ |
| TiO2+POM | Xe arc lamp λ > 300 nm, benzene:H2O:CH3CN = 0.05 mL:24 mL:1 mL, O2, RT, 8 h | 13 | 85 | 11.0 | [ |
| Ti0.98Fe0.01Cr0.01O2 | Hg lamp (200–400 nm), 1 mL benzene,2 mL CH3CN, 2 mL H2O2, H2O, 25 °C, 3–18 h | 15 | 94 | 14.1 | [ |
| FeVCu/TiO2 | Black light blue fluorescent bulb, benzene:H2O2 = 0.5, 40 mL CH3CN, 30 °C, 4 h | 18.6 | 52 | 9.7 | [ |
| Cu(OH)2/LT | UV illumination, 100 μL benzene, 500 μL CH3CN, 13 mL H2O, 87 μL H2O2, RT, 6 h | 50 | 97 | 45 | [ |
| Pt/WO3 | 220 < λ < 470 nm, 1 mL benzene, 1 mL H2O, 60 °C, 3 h | 97 | [ | ||
| Pt(0.2)-WO3 | 300 < λ < 500 nm, 2.5 mmol benzene, 7.5 mL H2O, 60 °C, 4 h | 69 | 74 | 49 | [ |
| Pt/WO3 | Xe lamp (420–540 nm), 0.3 mmol benzene, 5 mL H2O, 25 °C, 20 h | 70 | [ | ||
| IL-ZnO2 | Hg lamp (250–450 nm), 1 mL benzene, 2 ml CH3CN, 2 mL H2O2, | 5.2 | 92 | 4.8 | [ |
| Bi2WO6/CdWO4 | Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm), 3 mL CH3CN, 0.1 mL H2O, 0.5 mmol benzene, 25 °C, 3 h | 7.3 | 99 | 7.2 | [ |
| FeVO4@TMOS | Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm), 3 mL CH3CN, 3 mL H2O, 0.1 mL benzene, | 20 | 98 | 20 | [ |
| FeVO4@DTOS | 13 | 98 | 13 |
Catalytic performance of POMs-based photocatalysts for benzene hydroxylation.
| Photocatalyst | Reaction Conditions | Con./% | Sel./% | Yield/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-POMS | Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm), 1.28 mmol benzene, 10 mL CH3CN, 1 mL H2O, RT, 10 h. | 21 | 99 | 20.9 | [ |
| NH2-MIL-88/ | LED lamp (320–780 nm), 1 mL benzene, 3 mL acetic acid, | 12.5 | 99 | 12.4 | [ |
| Quinolinium and Polyoxovanadate-Based Supramolecular | Xe lamp (λ > 420 nm), H2O:CH3CN = 3:17( | 51 | 99 | 50.8 | [ |
Catalytic performance of g-C3N4-based photocatalysts for benzene hydroxylation.
| Photocatalyst | Reaction Conditions | Con./% | Sel./% | Yield/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNF | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.8 mL benzene, 4 mL H2O, 4 mL CH3CN, | 16.8 | [ | ||
| Fe-g-C3N4/SBA-15 | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.8 mL benzene, 4 mL H2O, 4 mL CH3CN, | 11.9 | [ | ||
| FeCl3/mpg-C3N4 | Mercury lamp, 4.5 mmol benzene, 2 mL H2O, 2 mL CH3CN, | 38 | 97 | 32.5 | [ |
| Fe-g-C3N4-LUS-1 | Mercury lamp, 4 mL CH3CN, 1 mL benzene, 0.5 mL H2O2, 4 h, 60 °C | 98 | [ | ||
| Fe-CN/TS-1 | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.8 mL benzene, 4 mL H2O, 4 mL CH3CN, 0.5 mL H2O2, 60 °C, 4 h | 54 | 18.4 | 10 | [ |
| Fc-MCN | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.8 mL benzene, 4 mL H2O, 4 mL CH3CN, 0.51 mL H2O2, 60 °C, 4 h | 48 | 34.7 | 16.5 | [ |
| Fc-CN | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.8 mL benzene, 4 mL H2O, 4 mL CH3CN, 0.51 mL H2O2, 60 °C, 4 h | 16.9 | [ | ||
| Fe-g-C3N4 | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.8 mL benzene, 4 mL H2O, | 100 | 8.3 | 8.3 | [ |
| Cu-g-C3N4 | 76.7 | 3.6 | 2.6 | ||
| Ni-g-C3N4 | 12 | 1.7 | 0.2 | ||
| Mn-g-C3N4 | 42.9 | 0.15 | 6.2 | ||
| Co-g-C3N4 | 40.2 | 0.003 | 0.002 | ||
| Cu-Ag@g-C3N4 | Domestic bulb, 1 mmol benzene, 5 mL CH3CN, | 99 | [ | ||
| Cu-Au@g-C3N4 | Cool LED bulb, 1 mmol benzene, 5 mL CH3CN, | 99 | [ | ||
| Au-Pd@g-C3N4 | Mercury lamp (λ > 420 nm), 1 mL benzene,5 mL CH3CN, | 26 | 100 | 26 | [ |
| Ni-CuWO4/g-C3N4 | Sunlight, 1 mL benzene, 0.2 mL H2O, | 98.5 | 81.5 | 80.3 | [ |
Figure 4Proposed mechanism for hydroxylation of benzene by Au-Pd/g-C3N4 catalyst under visible-light irradiation. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. 2018 American Chemical Society.
Catalytic performance of MOFs-based photocatalysts for benzene hydroxylation.
| Photocatalyst | Reaction Conditions | Con./% | Sel./% | Yield/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL-100(Fe) | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.5 mmol benzene, 2 mL H2O, 2 mL CH3CN, 0.375 mmol H2O2, RT, 8 h | 20.1 | 98 | 19.5 | [ |
| MIL-100(Fe) | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 1 mmol benzene, 5 mL H2O, 3 mL CH3CN, 0.6 mmol H2O2, RT, 3–21 h | 34.4 | 98 | 33.8 | [ |
| Cu (II) MOF | LED lamp (λ > 420 nm), 1 mmol benzene, 10 mL H2O, 1.25 mmol H2O2, 60 °C, 10 h | 29 | 95 | 27.4 | [ |
| UiO-66-NH2-SA-V | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 1 mL benzene, 5 mL CH3CN, 1 mL acetic acid, H2O2, 60 °C, 4 h | 15.3 | 100 | 15.3 | [ |
| NH2-MIL-88B(Fe)-SA-V | Visible light, 1 mL benzene, 18 mL acetic acid, H2O2, 60 °C, 4 h | 22.5 | 98.6 | 22.2 | [ |
Figure 5Reaction mechanism of photocatalytic hydroxylation of benzene by h-BCN combined with FeCl3. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [88]. 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 6Proposed mechanism of photocatalytic benzene oxidation to phenol over copper/titanium dioxide/CNT catalysts. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [93]. 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 7Photocatalytic hydroxylation of benzene to phenol over ZFO@C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [95]. 2022 Elsevier.
Catalytic performance of carbon-materials-based photocatalysts for benzene hydroxylation.
| Photocatalyst | Reaction Conditions | Con./% | Sel./% | Yield/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| h-BCN | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.8 mL benzene, 4 mL FeCl3 (aq), 4 mL CH3CN, 0.5 mL H2O2, 60 °C, 2 h | 16 | 88.3 | 14 | [ |
| RGO-Cys | LED lamp, 5 mmol benzene, 25 mL H2O, 5 mmol H2O2, 60 °C, 20 h | 1.0 | 87 | 0.87 | [ |
| Cu2O/dG | ED lamp, 1 mmol benzene, 5 mL H2O, 1 mmol H2O2, 25 °C, 16 h | 30 | 63.9 | 19.3 | [ |
| Cu/Ti/CNT | Mercury lamp UV–vis, 20 mL benzene, 20 mL H2O, | 68.3 | 75.8 | 51.8 | [ |
| ZFO@C | Xenon lamp (λ > 420 nm), 0.1 mL benzene, 3 mL CH3CN, 3 mL H2O, 0.5 mL H2O2, RT | 16 | 99.4 | 15.5 | [ |
| Fe@NC | 0.25 mL benzene, 3 mL H2O, 3 mL CH3CN, 2 mL H2O2, 60 °C, 12 h | 16 | 95 | 14.5 | [ |
Catalytic performance of other photocatalysts for benzene hydroxylation.
| Photocatalyst | Reaction Conditions | Con./% | Sel./% | Yield/% | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FePc | mercury lamp, 1 mL benzene, 3 mL H2O2, | 15 | 99 | 15.2 | [ |
| ZnTi-LDH | Xe lamp (λ > 420) nm, 0.2 mmol benzene, 1 atm air, | 5.7 | 87.18 | 5.0 | [ |
| [Fe(H2O)3]2[Ru(CN)]6 | Λ > 390 nm, 2.5 mL CH3CN, 0.40 mL benzene, | 61.28 | [ |