Literature DB >> 36080125

Bioassay-Guided Isolation of New Flavonoid Glycosides from Platanus × acerifolia Leaves and Their Staphylococcus aureus Inhibitory Effects.

Xiying Wu1,2,3, Yu Tang4, Ezzat E A Osman1,5, Jiang Wan2, Wei Jiang6, Guoxun Yang1, Juan Xiong1, Quangang Zhu3, Jin-Feng Hu1,2.   

Abstract

Despite the rapid advances in drug R&D, there is still a huge need for antibacterial medications, specifically for the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Inspired by the research where a viable class of MRSA inhibitors was found in the species Platanus occidentalis, a S. aureus inhibition screening-guided phytochemical reinvestigation on Platanus × acerifolia (London plane tree) leaves were performed with four flavonoid glycosides garnered, including two new compounds, quercetin-3-O-α-l-(2″-E-p-coumaroyl-3″-Z-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnopyranoside (E,Z-3'-hydroxyplatanoside, 1) and quercetin-3-O-α-l-(2″-Z-p-coumaroyl-3″-E-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnopyranoside (Z,E-3'-hydroxyplatanoside, 2). All of the isolates showed significant S. aureus ATCC 25904 inhibitory activity with MICs ranging from 4 to 64 μg/mL, suggesting the potential of discovering drug leads for the control of S. aureus from such a rich, urban landscaping plant in the Platanus genus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Platanaceae; Platanus × acerifolia; Staphylococcus aureus; antibacterial; flavonoid glycosides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36080125      PMCID: PMC9457999          DOI: 10.3390/molecules27175357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.927


1. Introduction

Owing to the long-standing misuse of antibiotics, Staphylococcus aureus has become resistant to many commonly used first-line drugs [1,2]. For instance, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is able to resist most of the β-lactam antibiotics and is a leading cause of high bacterial infection-related morbidity and mortality [3,4,5]. There is consequently an urgent need to develop alternatives for the control of S. aureus infections. Still, plant-derived natural products remain one of the primary sources of new drugs [6,7], as demonstrated by the isolation and characterization of a few flavonoid glycosides with promising anti-MRSA bioactivity from the American sycamore, Platanus occidentalis (family Platanaceae), as presented by Hamann et al. [4]. The genus Platanus contains seven deciduous species and twelve subspecies [8], of which three are widely distributed in China, namely P. occidentalis Linn., P. orientalis Linn. (the oriental plane) and P. × acerifolia Willd (the hybrid London plane) [9,10]. Of note, P. occidentalis and P. orientalis have long been used as traditional folk medicines for the treatment of a variety of diseases such as blepharitis, conjunctivitis, gastrointestinal disorders, diarrhea, toothache and skin disease [4,11]. Being one of the most famous urban landscaping trees in the world, P. × acerifolia is popular, and which earned the reputation of the “King of Road Trees” [12,13]. Reportedly, a wide range of secondary metabolites (e.g., flavonoids, glycosides, furan coumarins, terpenoids, sterols and organic acids) have been isolated from the buds [8,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and the bark [21,22,23,24,25] of P. occidentalis and P. orientalis. While being very much abundant in China, only a few flavonols have been obtained from the leaves of P. × acerifolia [26]. Literally, from both chemodiverse and antibacterial perspectives, P. × acerifolia leaves can be considered underexplored. In addition, as inspired by the research regarding the discovery of a viable class of MRSA inhibitors mentioned above [4], we therefore conducted a phytochemical study on P. × acerifolia leaves under the guidance of a S. aureus inhibitory activity screening.

2. Results and Discussion

The preliminary bioactivity evaluation of subfractions (F1–F6) from the 75% ethanolic extract of P. × acerifolia leaves revealed that F4 (60% EtOH) showed a mild inhibitory effect (MIC: 256 μg/mL) on S. aureus ATCC 25904. This subfraction was then subjected to repeated column chromatography over silica gel, macroporous resin D101, MCI gel and Sephadex LH-20 followed by semi-preparative HPLC to afford two new (1 and 2) and two known (3 and 4) flavonoid glycosides as shown in Figure 1. The new ones were elucidated to be quercetin-3-O-α-(2″-E-p-coumaroyl-3″-Z-p-coumaroyl)- rhamnopyranoside (1) and quercetin-3-O-α-(2″-Z-p-coumaroyl-3″-E-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnopyranoside (2) through the 1D-/2D-NMR data analysis in conjunction with the HRMS experiments. By comparing the observed and reported spectroscopic data and physicochemical properties, the known structures were identified as kaempferol-3-O-α-l-(2″-Z-p-coumaroyl-3″-E-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnopyranoside (Z, E-platanoside, 3) [4] and kaempferol-3-O-α-l-(2″,3″-di-E-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnopyranoside (E, E-platanoside, 4) [4]. The HRMS and NMR spectra of compounds 1 and 2 are available in Supporting Information.
Figure 1

Chemical structures of flavonoid glycosides 1–4 from P. × acerifolia leaves.

Compound 1 was obtained as a yellowish-brown powder, and its positive-mode HRESIMS data showed a sodium adduct ion at m/z 763.1621 [M + Na]+, which established a molecular formula of C39H32O15 with the aid of the 13C NMR (Table 1) data. The UV spectrum showed characteristic absorption bands at 272 and 314 nm, suggesting the existence of a 3-OH substituted flavanol skeleton [27,28]. The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) displayed three coupled aromatic proton signals at δH 7.42 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz, H-6′), δH 7.38 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′), and δH 6.96 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-5′) attributed to a 1,3,4-trisubstituted benzene ring, along with two meta-coupled doublets at δH 6.39 (1H, d, J = 2.0, H-8) and δH 6.21 (1H, d, J = 2.0, H-6). Undoubtedly, the data above delineated a quercetin backbone [29,30,31]. In addition, the 1H-1H COSY motif (Figure 2) of H-1″/H-2″/H-3″/H-4″/H-5″/H3-6″ in conjunction with the 13C (Table 1) and HSQC NMR experiments (Figure S3) revealed the presence of an α-rhamnose moiety [29,32], which was found to locate at C-3 due to the key HMBC correlation from H-1″ to C-3 (δ 135.56) (Figure 2). Besides, two p-coumarate units were constructed owing to the observation of two sets of well-resolved proton signals: δH 7.47 (2H, br d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2‴, 6‴), δH 6.80 (2H, br d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-3‴, 5‴), δH 7.61 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-7‴), and δH 6.31 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-8‴) accounting for a (E)-p-coumarate unit; δH 7.69 (2H, br d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2′′′′, 6′′′′) and δH 6.77 (2H, br d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-3′′′′, 5′′′′), together with δH 6.88 (1H, d, J = 12.8 Hz, H-7′′′′) and δH 5.73 (1H, d, J = 12.8 Hz, H-8′′′′), arising from a (Z)-p-coumaryl moiety. The down-field shifted the chemical shifts of H-2″ and H-3″ as well as the HMBC correlations (Figure 2) from H-2″ to C-9‴ (δC 167.77) and H-3″ to C-9′′′′ (δC 167.58) allowed the assembly of the (E)- and (Z)-p-coumaryl units that connected to C-2″ and C-3″ via the ester bonds, respectively. Thus, compound 1 was determined as quercetin-3-O-α-(2″-E-p-coumaroyl-3″-Z-p- coumaroyl)-rhamnopyranside.
Table 1

NMR spectroscopic data (in CD3OD) for compound 1.

PositionδCδH, Multi. (J in Hz)PositionδCδH, Multi. (J in Hz)
Flavonol moietyRhamnosyl moiety
2161.45 1″100.355.53, d (1.6)
3135.56 2″70.805.81, dd (1.6, 3.6)
4179.35 3″72.835.25, dd (3.6, 9.6)
5163.25 4″70.913.58, t (9.6)
699.896.21, d (2.0)5″72.273.60, m
7165.92 6″17.741.03, d (5.2)
894.756.39, d (2.0)1‴127.08
9158.55 2‴, 6‴131.407.47, br d (8.4)
10105.88 3‴, 5‴116.846.80, br d (8.4)
1′122.76 4‴159.29
2′116.697.38, d (2.0)7‴147.577.61, d (15.6)
3′146.61 8‴114.296.31, d (15.6)
4′149.96 9‴167.77
5′116.636.96, d (8.4)1′′′′127.58
6′123.057.42, dd (2.0, 8.4)2′′′′, 6′′′′133.857.69, br d (8.4)
3′′′′, 5′′′′115.876.77, br d (8.4)
4′′′′160.11
7′′′′145.846.88, d (12.8)
8′′′′116.205.73, d (12.8)
9′′′′167.58
Figure 2

Key 2D (COSY and HMBC) NMR correlations of compounds 1 and 2.

Compound 2 exhibited the same molecular formula (C39H32O15) as 1 based on the HRESIMS data (Figure S13). A comparison of the NMR data of 2 (Table 2) with those of 1 showed the very much close structural similarity between the two compounds. Differing from 1, the bonding positions of the (E)- and (Z)-p-coumaryl units with the rhamnose were found to be swapped upon closer inspection of the HMBC spectrum of 2 (Figure 2), with the (E)-p-coumaryl unit connecting to C-3″, while (Z)-p-coumaryl unit connecting to C-2″. Thus, compound 2 was identified as quercetin-3-O-α-(2″-Z-p-coumaroyl-3″-E-p-coumaroyl)-rhamnopyranoside.
Table 2

NMR spectroscopic data (in CD3OD) for compound 2.

PositionδCδH, Multi. (J in Hz)PositionδCδH, Multi. (J in Hz)
Flavonol moietyRhamnosyl moiety
2161.31 1″100.495.49, d (1.6)
3135.65 2″70.625.81, dd (1.6, 3.6)
4179.38 3″73.115.25, dd (3.6, 9.6)
5163.98 4″70.913.51, t (9.6)
699.906.22, d (2.0)5″72.223.61, m
7165.34 6″17.691.01, d (6.0)
894.766.40, d (2.0)1‴127.37
9158.56 2‴, 6‴133.987.63, br d (8.8)
10105.53 3‴, 5‴115.996.63, br d (8.8)
1′122.73 4‴160.22
2′116.687.39, d (2.0)7‴146.586.92, d (12.8)
3′146.61 8‴115.375.79, d (12.8)
4′149.97 9‴166.58
5′116.616.97, d (8.4) 1′′′′127.10
6′123.027.43, dd (2.0, 8.4)2′′′′, 6′′′′131.247.36, br d (8.8)
3′′′′, 5′′′′116.836.77, br d (8.8)
4′′′′160.47
7′′′′147.107.63, d (16.0)
8′′′′114.946.28, d (16.0)
9′′′′168.65
The ability of compounds 1–4 to inhibit the growth of S. aureus ATCC 25904 was then tested by in vitro antibacterial susceptibility assays. Methicillin and chloramphenicol were used as the positive controls. Notably, all the compounds were found to possess antibacterial activity against S. aureus with MICs ranging from 4 to 64 μg/mL (Table 3). Among them, compounds 3 and 4 showed considerable S. aureus inhibition activities with MICs at the level of 4 and 16 μg/mL, respectively. Along with the relatively weaker inhibition effects of 1 and 2, both MIC values are 64 μg/mL—this study is in good agreement with the reported data in terms of the structure–activity relationship [4]. Briefly, all the compounds in this study showed antibacterial activity, confirming that a flavonoid moiety connected to the p-coumaroyl groups via a sugar unit (e.g., rhamnose) and hydroxy groups at positions 5, 7, and 4′ are essential for the antibacterial activity against S. aureus. Meanwhile, the bioactivity results of compounds 1 and 2 implied that the presence of a hydroxy group at position 3′ presumably has a negative impact on such antimicrobial activity while the E- or Z-configuration of the p-coumaroyl units does not exert effects. In general, the data presented herein suggest that the genus Platanus (especially the abundant P. × acerifolia leaves) could serve as a promising source for the development of drugs to treat S. aureus infections, more specifically, glycosides from this genus with flavonoids and p-coumarinoids being the aglycone parts.
Table 3

In vitro antibacterial activity of the isolated flavonoid glycosides.

CompoundMIC (μg/mL)
1 64 a
2 64 a
3 4 c
4 16 b
Methicillin2 d
Chloramphenicol4 c

Data are presented as the mean of three parallel experiments. Different superscript letters (i.e., a–d) indicate significant differences among the compounds at p < 0.05.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures and Agents

UV and IR spectra were recorded on a U-2900E spectrophotometer (Hitachi High-Technologies, Beijing, China) and a Nicolet Is5 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), respectively. 1D- and 2D-NMR experiments (1H, 13C, DEPT, COSY, HSQC and HMBC) were performed in CD3OD on a Bruker Avance III 400, and/or a Bruker Avance 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Rheinstetten, Germany). HRESIMS were acquired on a micro TOF-QII or an AB 5600+ Q TOF spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). ESIMS were obtained from a Waters UPLC H ClassSQD or an Agilent 1100 series mass spectrometer. CC was performed over silica gel (100–200 mesh, Kang-Bi-Nuo Silysia Chemical Ltd., Yantai, China), MCI (CHP20P, 75–150 Μm, Mitsubishi Chemical Industries, Tokyo, Japan), macroporous resin D101 (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). RP-HPLC separations were conducted on a Waters e2695 system equipped with a Waters 2998 Photodiode Array Detector on ODS columns (SunFire: 5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm; 5 μm, 250 × 10 mm). TLC analyses were carried out using precoated GF254 (0.25 mm thickness) plates (Kang-Bi-Nuo Silysia Chemical Ltd., Yantai, China); the compounds were detected by UV light (254 and/or 365 nm) and 10% H2SO4-EtOH.

3.2. Plant Material

The green leaves of P. × acerifolia were collected from dozens of trees in January 2018 along the roadside at Zhangjiang campus, Fudan University in Shanghai, China, and identified by Prof. Ze-Xin Jin (Taizhou University). A voucher specimen (No. 20180508) has been deposited at the Herbarium of the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Taizhou University, China.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

Platanus × acerifolia leaves (30 kg) were dried, ground, and extracted four times using 75% ethanol (EtOH). The 75% ethanolic extract (3.5 kg) was loaded to column chromatography over macroporous resin D101 as stationary phase and eluted with step gradients of EtOH/H2O (from 0% to 100%, v/v) to afford six main fractions: F1 (100% H2O), F2 (30% EtOH), F3 (50% EtOH), F4 (60% EtOH), F5 (75% EtOH), and F6 (100% EtOH). F4 (750 g) was re-subjected to D101 column chromatography with step gradient elution of EtOH/H2O (from 30% to 100%, v/v), yielding six sub-fractions F4-A~F. F4-D (70% EtOH, 70.0 g) was then successively purified using MCI column chromatography with MeOH/H2O (from 50% to 100%, v/v) used as the step gradient mobile phase, Sephadex LH-20 CC, and semi-prep RP-HPLC [SunFire; flow rate, 3.0 mL/min]. Finally, compounds 1 (3.0 mg, t = 22.5 min) and 2 (3.2 mg, t = 31.7 min) were obtained using semi-prep HPLC-DAD [SunFire, MeOH/H2O (containing 0.05% TFA, v/v) 66:34, v/v], while compounds 3 (5.0 mg, t = 19.6 min) and 4 (20.0 mg, t = 16.2 min) were generated using semi-prep HPLC-DAD [SunFire, MeOH/H2O (containing 0.05% TFA, v/v) 73:27, v/v]. Compound 1: yellowish-brown amorphous powder; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 272 (3.18), 314 (3.46) nm; IR (film) νmax 3419, 2963, 2922, 2853, 1659, 1607, 1512, 1384, 1054 and 1018 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (CD3OD) data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 763.1621 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C39H32O15, 763.1633, δ = −1.6 ppm). Compound 2: yellowish-brown amorphous powder; UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 270 (3.70), 312 (4.05) nm; IR (film) νmax 3421, 2970, 2923, 2866, 1659, 1605, 1512, 1384, 1050 and 1014 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (CD3OD) data, see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 763.1613 [M + Na]+ (calcd. for C39H32O15, 763.1633, δ = −2.7 ppm).

3.4. In Vitro Antibacterial Susceptibility Assays

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was evaluated on the basis of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines by the conventional two-fold microbroth gradient dilution assay [33,34]. S. aureus ATCC 25904 was inoculated to the Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plates and cultured for 18~24 h at 35 °C for activation. The diluted bacterial suspension in Cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton Ⅱ broth (CAMHB) with a turbidity of (1~2) × 106 CFU/mL was ready for detection according to the direct bacterial suspension method. The subfractions and isolates were firstly dissolved in DMSO to produce solutions at the concentrations of 10.0 mg/mL and 2.0 mg/mL, respectively. The resulting solutions were then diluted with fresh CAMHB medium to produce working concentrations of 1024 (from 512 μg/mL to 1 μg/mL in 96-well plates) and 128 μg/mL (from 64 μg/mL to 0.125 μg/mL in 96-well plates), respectively. Then, 100 μL of the working isolates solution was distributed in each well, while the growth controls contained equal amounts of DMSO. Finally, the bacteria-containing suspension (100 μL) was added to each well. The 96-well plates were incubated at 35 °C for 16~20 h, and MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of the drugs that completely inhibited the growth of bacteria. Chloramphenicol and Methicillin were used as positive controls, which were active against S. aureus. All the tests were performed in triplicate.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

The MIC results were analyzed for their variances by ANOVA using the SAS program (version 9.2). Differences among means of different compounds were assessed by Tukey’s multiple comparison statistical analysis at a p = 0.05 level of significance.

4. Conclusions

Previous phytochemical studies on the buds [8,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and the bark [21,22,23,24,25] of P. occidentalis and P. orientalis led to the isolation and characterization of a large number of secondary metabolites, including flavonoids, glycosides, furan coumarins, terpenoids, sterols and organic acids. However, as a hybrid of these two medicinally used plants [4,11], P.× acerifolia is still lacking phytochemical and biological investigations to a large extent. In the present work, we hence focused on the flavonoid glycosides from the leaves of P.× acerifolia, which gleaned two previously undescribed flavonoid glycosides (compounds 1 and 2) as well as two known ones (compounds 3 and 4). Regarding the bioactivity evaluations, all of the isolates showed considerable S. aureus ATCC 25904 inhibition effects with MICs ranging from 4 to 64 μg/mL. While the mechanism of action requires further study, which is currently in progress in our laboratory and would trigger the next stage of research, including animal testing and the survey of plant resources available for providing bulk drug substances, the above findings expanded the structural diversity of P.× acerifolia and could provide useful clues for discovery and development of new therapeutic or preventive agents for the treatment of S. aureus infection-related diseases.
  19 in total

1.  Two novel prenylated kaempferol derivatives from fresh bud's fur of Platanus acerifolia and their anti-proliferative activities.

Authors:  Bo Zuo; Zhi-Xin Liao; Chen Xu; Chao Liu
Journal:  Nat Prod Res       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.861

2.  The relationship between particulate matter retention capacity and leaf surface micromorphology of ten tree species in Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Xiaolu Li; Tianran Zhang; Fengbin Sun; Ximing Song; Yinke Zhang; Fang Huang; Chuyang Yuan; Hui Yu; Guihao Zhang; Feng Qi; Feng Shao
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Flavonol glycosides from Epimedium pubescens.

Authors:  Fengjuan Tu; Yi Dai; Zhihong Yao; Xinluan Wang; Xinsheng Yao; Ling Qin
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.645

4.  Phytochemical study and biological evaluation of chemical constituents of Platanus orientalis and Platanus × acerifolia buds.

Authors:  Quoc Dang Thai; Job Tchoumtchoua; Maria Makropoulou; Athina Boulaka; Aggeliki K Meligova; Dimitra J Mitsiou; Sophia Mitakou; Sylvie Michel; Maria Halabalaki; Michael N Alexis; Leandros A Skaltsounis
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.072

5.  Camellianoside, a novel antioxidant glycoside from the leaves of Camellia japonica.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Onodera; Kaoru Hanashiro; Takeshi Yasumoto
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.043

6.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-active metabolites from Platanus occidentalis (American Sycamore).

Authors:  Mohamed A Ibrahim; Arsala A Mansoor; Amanda Gross; M Khalid Ashfaq; Melissa Jacob; Shabana I Khan; Mark T Hamann
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 7.  The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Ruud H Deurenberg; Ellen E Stobberingh
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Optimized arylomycins are a new class of Gram-negative antibiotics.

Authors:  Peter A Smith; Michael F T Koehler; Hany S Girgis; Donghong Yan; Yongsheng Chen; Yuan Chen; James J Crawford; Matthew R Durk; Robert I Higuchi; Jing Kang; Jeremy Murray; Prasuna Paraselli; Summer Park; Wilson Phung; John G Quinn; Tucker C Roberts; Lionel Rougé; Jacob B Schwarz; Elizabeth Skippington; John Wai; Min Xu; Zhiyong Yu; Hua Zhang; Man-Wah Tan; Christopher E Heise
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology.

Authors:  Sahreena Lakhundi; Kunyan Zhang
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 202.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.