| Literature DB >> 36080012 |
Likhan Das1, Fazlay Rubbi2, Khairul Habib1, Navid Aslfattahi3, Saidur Rahman4, Syed Mohd Yahya5, Kumaran Kadirgama6,7.
Abstract
Nanofluids are identified as advanced working fluids in the solar energy conversion field with superior heat transfer characteristics. This research work introduces carbon-based diamond nanomaterial and Therminol®55 oil-based nanofluids for implementation in a concentrated photovoltaic/thermal (CPV/T) solar collector. This study focuses on the experimental formulation, characterization of properties, and performance evaluation of the nanofluid-based CPV/T system. Thermo-physical (thermal conductivity, viscosity, and rheology), optical (UV-vis and FT-IR), and stability (Zeta potential) properties of the formulated nanofluids are characterized at 0.001-0.1 wt.% concentrations of dispersed particles using experimental assessment. The maximum photo-thermal energy conversion efficiency of the base fluid is improved by 120.80% at 0.1 wt.%. The thermal conductivity of pure oil is increased by adding the nanomaterial. The highest enhancement of 73.39% is observed for the TH-55/DP nanofluid. Furthermore, dynamic viscosity decreased dramatically across the temperature range studied (20-100 °C), and the nanofluid exhibited dominant Newtonian flow behavior, with viscosity remaining nearly constant up to a shear rate of 100 s-1. Numerical simulations of the nanofluid-operated CPV/T collector have disclosed substantial improvements. At a concentrated solar irradiance of 5000 W/m2 and an optimal flow rate of 3 L/min, the highest thermal and electrical energy conversion efficiency enhancements are found to be 11 and 1.8%, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: nanofluid; optical properties; stability and CPV/T solar collector; thermal properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080012 PMCID: PMC9458180 DOI: 10.3390/nano12172975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Summary of recent studies on PV/T or CPV/T system using different nanofluids at various operating conditions.
| Study | Nanofluids | Dimension and Concentration (φ) | Solar Irradiance | Temperature | Flow Rate | Important Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasrin, et al. [ | Water/Cu, Ag and Al | -- | 5000 W/m2 | 20–140 °C | 180 L/h | - The nanofluids exhibited optimized perfor-mance at 2 vol.% concentration. The |
| Bellos and Tzivanidis [ | Syltherm-800/CuO | -- | 1000 W/m2 | 25–200 °C | 300–720 L/h | - 1.66, 5.17, 3.05 and 2.08% enhancements were obtained in |
| Alous, et al. [ | Water/Graphene and MWCNT | 0.55–1.2 nm 18–28 nm respectively. | Up to 1000 W/m2 | 20–80 °C | 0.5 L/min | - The PV surface temperature was reduced by 14 °C with graphene nanoplatelets and 16 °C with MWCNT NFs. In comparison to PVT-water, the NF-based PV/T had an improved average daily total energetic efficiency of 18.0 and 7% for graphene and MWCNT NFs, respectively. |
| Rubbi, et al. [ | Soybean oil/ MXene | 1–10 µm × 1 nm | 1000 W/m2 | 25–80 °C | 0.01–0.07 kg/s | - |
| Kazem, et al. [ | Water-EG/SiC | 45–65 nm | 200–1000 W/m2 | 25–70 °C | 10–40 kg/h | - PV-cell temperature dropped by 11.34%, while |
| Aslfattahi, et al. [ | Silicon oil/ MXene | 1–10 µm × 1 nm | 1000–8000 W/m2 | 30–200 °C | 0.005 kg/s | - PV panel temperature lessened by 12.45% and 11.92% enhanced energy output was achieved for the collector using NF at 0.1 wt.%. |
| Huaxu, et al. [ | Glycol/ZnO | -- | Up to 861 W/m2 | -- | -- | - Photo-thermal efficiency improved by 47% adding ZnO NPs from 11.2 to 89.2 ppm. 3.8% higher energy conversion efficiency is achieved relative to conventional CPV. |
| Khanjari, et al. [ | Water/Al2O3 | -- | 200–800 W/m2 | 30–70 °C | 0.00136 kg/s | - |
| Nasrin, et al. [ | Water/Cu, Ag and Al | -- | 5000 W/m2 | 20–140 °C | 180 L/h | - The nanofluids exhibited optimized perfor-mance at 2 vol.% concentration. The |
Properties of the Material used for nanofluid Formulation.
| Material | Parameter | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Therminol®55 (EASTMAN) | Appearance | Clear, yellow liquid |
| Normal boiling point | 351 (°C) | |
| Liquid density (20 °C) | 872 (kg/m3) | |
| Thermal conductivity (20 °C) | 0.1284 W/(m·K) | |
| Viscosity (20 °C) | 41.6 (mPa·s) | |
| Diamond (US Research Nanomaterials, Inc) | Color | Grey |
| Purity | 98.3% | |
| Size | 3–10 (nm) | |
| Morphology | Spherical | |
| Density | 0.16–0.18 (g/cm3) |
Figure 1(a) Schematic of Two-step Nanofluid Formulation method, (b) Formulated TH-55/DP stable nanofluid at different concentrations.
Figure 2(a)Tempos thermal conductivity measuring instrument based on transient hot wire method, (b) Schematic of the thermal conductivity measurement setup.
Figure 3Schematic illustration of (a) the intended nanofluid operated PV/T system, (b) concentrated solar irradiations on the surface of each PV cell.
Specifications and properties of the PV/T system Nasrin, et al. [41].
| Parameter | Values |
|---|---|
| Power | 300 W |
| Dimensions | 1955 mm × 982 mm × 36 mm |
| Weight of PV panel | 20.5 kg |
|
| 150 W/m2K |
|
| 77 W/m2K |
|
| 66 W/m2K |
|
| 0.9 |
|
| 0.5 |
|
| 0.99 |
|
| 0.311 W/m·K |
|
| 148 W/m·K |
|
| 0.15 W/m·K |
Figure 4(a) 3D grid generation of the computational domain, (b) Poly-hexacore meshing of the PVT system, (c) Inflation layer at the solid-fluid interface.
Grid independency test.
| S. No. | Mesh Size | PV Temp. | Deviation | Outlet Temp. (°C) | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 42.341 | -- | 41.213 | -- |
| 2 |
| 43.872 | 1.2 | 40.751 | −1.13 |
| 3 |
| 44.003 | 0.29 | 40.254 | −1.23 |
| 4 |
| 44.118 | 0.26 | 39.104 | −2.94 |
| 5 |
| 45.200 | 2.3 | 38.889 | −0.55 |
| 6 |
| 45.201 | 0.002 | 38.801 | −0.22 |
Zeta potential values of TH-55/DP nanofluids.
| Concentration (wt.%) | Absolute Zeta Potential (mV) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| At 25 °C | Uncertainty (%) | At 80 °C | Uncertainty (%) | |
| 0.001 | 45.13 | <5 | 48.25 | <5 |
| 0.05 | 41.21 | 44.98 | ||
| 0.1 | 34.81 | 39.67 | ||
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of TH-55 and TH-55/DP nanofluids.
Figure 6Optical UV−vis absorbance results of TH−55 and TH−55/DP nanofluids.
Figure 7Thermal conductivity (a) variation and (b) enhancement of TH-55 and TH-55/DP NFs.
Figure 8Variation of dynamic viscosity of TH-55/DP nanofluids at 20–100 °C.
Figure 9Rheological behavior of TH-55/DP nanofluids at 0–100 s−1 shear rate: (a) 25 °C and (b) 50 °C.
Validation of average cell Temperature.
| Flowrate (LPM) | Cell Temperature (°C) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Present Research | Numerical Study Nasrin, et al. [ | Experimental Study Rahman, et al. [ | |
| 0.5 | 52.56 | 51.11 | 52.88 |
| 1 | 49.85 | 48.04 | 50.23 |
| 3 | 47.10 | 45.76 | 47.73 |
Validation of Electrical and thermal efficiency.
| Nanoparticle Concentration (Wt.%) | Electrical Efficiency (%) | Thermal Efficiency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present Research | Nasrin, et al. [ | Present Research | Nasrin, et al. [ | |
| 0.1% | 11.38 | 11.96 | 63.8 | 73.5 |
Figure 10Variation of (a) cell temperature, (b) electrical efficiency, (c) thermal efficiency, and (d) outlet temperature, v/s irradiance at 3LPM.