| Literature DB >> 36079684 |
Fatima Zahra Jawhari1, Hamada Imtara2, Abdelfattah El Moussaoui1, Hind Khalis3, Imane Es-Safi1, Omkulthom Al Kamaly4, Asmaa Saleh4, Mohammad Khalid Parvez5, Raja Guemmouh6, Amina Bari1.
Abstract
The reproductive system is essential for the structuring and transmission of genetic diversity. Understanding the reproductive biology of threatened endemic species is considered to be a crucial element for the implementation of effective conservation strategies. Given the lack of information and the insufficient state of knowledge on the reproductive system of Anacyclus pyrethrum L., a threatened medicinal species endemic to Morocco, we are the first to study the reproductive biology of two varieties of Anacyclus pyrethrum L.: Anacyclus pyrethrum var. pyrethrum (L.) Link and Anacyclus pyrethrum var. depressus (Ball.) Maire. The reproductive biology of the two varieties was examined in detail by studying the development of the inflorescence, phenology of flowering, breeding system, pollinators, production, and seed dispersal. The experimental results described in this work suggest that Anacyclus pyrethrum L. is a gynomonic species, with a mixed autogamy-allogamy reproductive regime with a high predominance of allogamy. It appears to be partially self-incompatible, with allogamy rates for Anacyclus pyrethrum var. depressus (Ball.) Maire and Anacyclus pyrethrum var. pyrethrum (L.) Link of 78.70% and 79.01%, respectively. It depends on pollination vectors to produce a large number of seeds. This study on the breeding system of Anacyclus pyrethrum L. provides a tool for developing management strategies and adequate conservation measures.Entities:
Keywords: breeding system; phenology of flowering; pollinators; seed dispersal
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079684 PMCID: PMC9459999 DOI: 10.3390/plants11172299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Population density in 2018 and 2019 at different study sites of A.P var. depressus and A.P var. pyrethrum.
| Stations | Population No | Varieties | Number of Quadrats | Density of Populations/Quadrat (4 m2) | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 2018 | Year 2019 | |||||
| Ifrane | P1 | 5 | 14 ± 1.51 | 19.4 ± 0.81 | ** | |
| Michelifn | P2 | 10 | 26 ±1.22 | 18.8 ± 0.73 | *** | |
| P3 | 1 | 5 ± 0 | 0 | *** | ||
| Jebel Habri | P4 | 10 | 12.8 ± 0.58 | 8 ± 0.70 | *** | |
| Timahdite | P5 | 10 | 10.4 ± 0.74 | 5.2 ± 0.66 | *** | |
| P6 | 10 | 63.8 ± 1.88 | 55.4 ± 1.43 | *** | ||
*** Statistically highly significant; ** statistically significant.
Figure 1Floral organisation of the study species. (A) Flower head; (B) ligulate flower; (C) tubular flower.
Reproductive performance of natural populations of A.P. var. pyrethrum and A.P. var. depressus.
| Variables | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of flowers per capitulum | 128.28 ± 27.65 | 91.2 ± 26.03 | ** |
| Number of peripheral flowers/capitula | 10.92 ± 1.28 | 13.15 ± 0.97 | ** |
| Number of central flowers/capitula | 117.36 ± 27.50 | 78.05 ± 25.92 | ** |
| Number of seeds/capitula | 116.98 ± 21.75 | 81.73 ± 22.45 | ** |
| Number of capitula per individual | 46.33 ± 10.09 | 115.49 ± 36.58 | *** |
| Number of seeds per individual | 5307.46 ± 1501.85 | 9490.71 ± 4840.36 | *** |
| Weight of 100 seeds | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.005 | ** |
*** Statistically highly significant; ** statistically significant.
Reproduction modalities of the two varieties A.P. var. pyrethrum and A.P. var. depressus.
| Treatments | Number of Flowers | Number of Seeds | IF | TC | TA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot 1 | 64.7 ± 14.90 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0% | |
| 65.15 ± 11.81 | 0 | 0 | 100% | 0% | ||
| Lot 2 | 737 ± 190.10 | 115.4 ± 22.66 | 0.16 | 78.70% | 21.29% | |
| 458 ± 127.49 | 81.5 ± 30.51 | 0.15 | 79.01% | 20.98% | ||
| Lot 3 | 710 ± 166.94 | 542 ± 150.81 | 0.75 | - | - | |
| 439.6 ± 137 | 353.1 ± 141.86 | 0.74 | - | - | ||
Figure 2Pollen grain morphology of the two varieties A.P. var. depressus (A) and A.P. var. pyrethrum (B).
Figure 3Examples of pollinators visiting the capitula of A.P. var. pyrethrum and A.P. var. depressus.
Orders and families of the various insects recorded on the capitula of A.P. var. pyrethrum and A.P. var. depressus.
| Population | Order | Suborder | Families | Genus | Species | Photos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemiptera | Heteroptera | Pentatomidae |
|
|
| |
| Hymenoptera | Aculeates | Formicoidae |
|
| ||
| Coleoptera | Polyphagous | Curculionidae |
|
| ||
| Coleoptera | Polyphagous | Geotrupidae |
|
| ||
| Hymenoptera | Apocrites | Apidae |
|
|
| |
| Coleoptera | Polyphagous | Staphylinidae |
|
|
| |
| Hymenoptera | Apocrites | Formicoidae |
|
| ||
| Coleoptera | Polyphagous | Curculionidae |
|
| ||
| Lepidoptera | Macrolepidoptera | Sphingidae |
|
|
| |
| Coleoptera | Adephagous | Carabidae |
|
| ||
| Araneids | Araneomorphs | Lycosidae |
|
|
| |
| Lepidoptera | Macrolepidoptera | Sphingidae |
|
|
| |
| Lepidoptera | Macrolepidoptera | Sphingidae |
|
|
| |
| Lepidoptera | Macrolepidoptera | Sphingidae |
|
|
| |
| Hymenoptera | Apocrites | Mutillidae |
|
|
| |
| Orthopteres | Caelifera | Acrididae |
|
| ||
| Orthopteres | Ensiferes | Tettigoniidae |
|
| ||
| Orthopteres | Ensiferes | Tettigoniidae |
|
| ||
| Hemiptera | Heteroptera | Pentatomidae |
|
|
| |
| Coleoptera | Polyphagous | Scarabaeidae |
|
|
| |
| Hymenoptera | Apocrites | Apidae |
|
|
| |
| Coleoptera | Scarabaeoides | Scarabaeidae |
|
|
| |
| Dermapteres | Eudermapteres | Forficulidae |
|
| ||
| Orthoptera | Coelifera | Acrididae |
|
| ||
| Coleoptera | Polyphagous | Tenebrionidae |
|
|
| |
| Coleoptera | Polyphagous | Cerambycidae |
|
|
|
Coordinates of the harvesting sites.
| Harvest Stations | Population No | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude | Varieties |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| P1 | 33.53178643° N | 5.10252178° W | 1683 m | |
|
| P2 | 33.41914871° N | 5.07954732° W | 1955 m | |
|
| P3 | 33.14311626° N | 5.15923206° W | 1948 m |
Figure 4Natural populations of A.P var. depressus and A.P var. pyrethrum monitored and sampled.