| Literature DB >> 36079649 |
Vasileia Chioti1,2, Konstantina Zeliou3, Aikaterini Bakogianni3, Charikleia Papaioannou2, Antonis Biskinis3, Constantinos Petropoulos4, Fotini N Lamari3, Vasileios Papasotiropoulos1.
Abstract
Eggplant is a widely consumed vegetable, with significant nutritional value and high antioxidant content, mainly due to its phenolic constituents. Our goal was to determine the levels of carbohydrates, proteins, total phenolics, anthocyanins, flavonoids, chlorogenic acid, and the antioxidant capacity in thirteen eggplant cultivars cultivated in Greece and to identify sequence polymorphisms in key regulating genes of the phenylpropanoid pathway (C4H, HCT, HQT, C3H, F3H, ANS, MYB1), which might relate to the phytochemical content of those cultivars. The carbohydrates' content differs among and within cultivars, while the rest of the phytochemicals differ only among cultivars. The cultivars 'EMI' and 'Lagkada' scored higher than the rest in phenolics, anthocyanins, ascorbic acid, caffeoylquinic acid, and antioxidant capacity. Moreover, significant correlations were observed between various ingredients and the antioxidant capacity (FRAP and DPPH). Sequence analysis revealed several SNPs in C4H, HQT, F3H, ANS, and MYB1 among the cultivars studied. According to chi-square and logistic regression analyses, the missense mutation C4H4-108 correlates significantly with flavonoids, anthocyanins, and proteins; the synonymous mutation HQT-105 correlates with anthocyanins and ascorbic acid; the missense mutation HQT-438 correlates with flavonoids and chlorogenic acid, while the missense mutation ANS1-65 correlates with anthocyanins and sugars. These polymorphisms can be potentially utilized as molecular markers in eggplant breeding, while our data also contribute to the study of eggplant's secondary metabolism and antioxidant properties.Entities:
Keywords: SNPs; Solanum melongena; anthocyanins; antioxidant capacity; chlorogenic acid; cultivars; flavonoids; phenolics; sequence variation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079649 PMCID: PMC9460228 DOI: 10.3390/plants11172267
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Eggplant cultivars that were studied; origin and fruit’s color and shape of each cultivar; average fresh fruit weight and standard deviation. Values in parentheses represent the standard error (SE) of the measurements; n: the number of biological samples.
| Cultivar | Origin | Fruit Color | Shape | Fruit Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‘Lagkada’ (n = 3) | GR | Deep purple | Cylindrical | 278.3 ± 39.6 (22.8) |
| ‘Tsakoniki’ (n = 3) | GR | Purple with white stripes | Cylindrical | 194.3 ± 19.1 (11.1) |
| ‘ΕΜΙ’ (n = 3) | GR | Deep purple | Oval | 481.7 ± 51.3 (29.6) |
| ‘Cristal F1’ (n = 6) | ES | Deep purple | Oval | 309.2 ± 31.9 (10.6) |
| ‘Sabelle F1’ (n = 3) | NL | Light purple | Round | 349.7 ± 58.4 (33.7) |
| ‘Angela F1’ (n = 3) | NL | Purple with white stripes | Oval | 236.7 ± 2.1 (1.2) |
| ‘Nilo F1’ (n = 3) | NL | Deep purple | Cylindrical | 122.7 ± 6.7 (3.8) |
| ‘Leticia F1’ (n = 9) | NL | Deep purple | Oval | 332.5 ± 48.7 (16.2) |
| ‘Monarca F1’ (n = 3) | NL | Deep purple | Oval | 262.7 ± 22.7 (13.1) |
| ‘Lydia’ F1’ (n = 9) | NL | Purple with white stripes | Oval | 270.2 ± 36.7 (15.0) |
| ‘Samantha F1 (n = 3) | NL | Light green | Oval | 304.7 ± 70.4 (40.7) |
| ‘Lato F1’ (n = 6) | NL | White | Oval | 254.7 ± 10.4 (4.2) |
| ‘Blanchette F1’ (n = 3) | NL | White | Round | 196.7 ± 17.6 (10.1) |
Abbreviations: GR: Greece, NL: The Netherlands, ES: Spain.
Figure 1Heat map showing the variation of total sugars, proteins, phenolics (TPC), anthocyanins (TMA), flavonoids (TFC), ascorbic acid (AsA), caffeoylquinic acid (CQA), and the antioxidant properties by FRAP and DPPH scavenging assays in 13 eggplant cultivars. Standardized values (z-scores) of mean values are depicted with a color scale (from blue to yellow).
Correlation coefficients and levels of significance among the physicochemical parameters studied.
| Weight | TPC | TFC | TMA | AsA | Proteins | Sugars | CQA | FRAP | DPPH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - | |||||||||
|
| 0.266 * | - | ||||||||
|
| 0.097 | 0.448 *** | - | |||||||
|
| 0.456 *** | 0.689 *** | 0.167 | - | ||||||
|
| 0.508 *** | 0.502 *** | 0.393 ** | 0.690 *** | - | |||||
|
| 0.231 | 0.514 *** | -0.180 | 0.619 *** | 0.405 ** | - | ||||
|
| 0.002 | 0.367 ** | 0.128 | 0.423 ** | 0.271 * | 0.392 ** | - | |||
|
| −0.156 | 0.327 * | 0.288 * | 0.321 * | 0.142 | 0.184 | 0.068 | - | ||
|
| −0.033 | 0.422 ** | 0.119 | 0.366 ** | 0.290 * | 0.134 | 0.107 | 0.400 * | - | |
|
| 0.417 ** | 0.761 *** | 0.337 * | 0.898 *** | 0.703 *** | 0.560 *** | 0.307 * | 0.379 ** | 0.363 ** | - |
* α < 0.05, ** α < 0.01, *** α < 0.001.
Observed nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes studied. Those in bold represent polymorphisms observed only in comparison with the reference sequence deposited in Kazusa Eggplant Genome DataBase. Mutation types, nucleotide substitutions, and amino acid changes are also presented.
| Gene/Exon | Alignment Position | Type of Mutation | Substitution | Translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 108 | missense | A>G | Thr>Ala | |
| 413 | synonymous | T>C | Ile | |
|
| 105 | synonymous | T>C | His |
| 438 | missense | T>G | His>Gln | |
| 565 | missense | A>G | Thr>Ala | |
| 996 | synonymous | T>C | Ser | |
|
| 163 | missense | A>G | Lys>Glu |
| 65 | missense | T>C | Val>Ala | |
| 141 | missense | T>A | Asp>Glu | |
| 186 | synonymous | A>G | Ser | |
| 282 | synonymous | T>C | His | |
|
| 52 | missense | T>A | Trp>Arg |
|
| synonymous | C>A | Glu | |
|
| synonymous | C>A | Ala | |
|
| missense | T>C | Phe>Ser | |
|
| synonymous | T>C | Leu |
X2 contingency table. In the first row, enzyme names along with the observed SNP’s positions (second row) are shown. The left column shows the phytochemicals that were examined for correlation with the above-mentioned SNPs. The columns in grey represent SNPs leading to synonymous mutations, while the rest to missense mutations. The numbers in bold show the statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05), while those in italics have p-values close to 0.05. Underlined numbers represent significant correlation values also observed in the logistic regression.
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 108 | 413 | 105 | 438 | 565 | 996 | 163 | 65 | 141 | 186 | 282 | |
|
| 0.109 | 0.109 |
| 0.460 | 0.460 | 0.460 | 0.460 | 0.143 | 0.143 | 0.143 | 0.143 |
|
|
|
| 0.877 |
|
|
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.050 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.087 | 0.087 |
| 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.130 | 0.068 | 0.098 | 0.098 | 0.098 | 0.098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.145 | 0.145 | 0.077 | 0.494 | 0.494 | 0.494 | 0.494 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.632 | 0.632 | 0.183 |
|
|
| 0.347 | 0.526 | 0.526 | 0.526 | 0.526 |