| Literature DB >> 36079591 |
Peng Ma1,2, Ping Fan2, Zhiyuan Yang2, Yongjian Sun2, Jun Ma2.
Abstract
To explore the impact of nitrogen (N) rate during the wheat season and N fertilizer management during the rice season on carbon and soil nutrient pools in paddy soil, a wheat-rice rotation system for 2 successive years was implemented. In the rotation system, a conventional N rate (Nc; 150 kg/ha) and a reduced N rate (Nr; 120 kg/ha) were applied in the wheat season. Based on an application rate of 150 kg/hm2 N in the rice season, three N management models were applied, in which the application ratio of base:tiller:panicle fertilizer was 20%:20%:60% in treatment M1, 30%:30%:40% in treatment M2, and 40%:40%:20% in treatment M3. Zero N was used as the control (M0). Experimental results indicate that, under Nc, the M2 management model during the rice season, improvements were seen in paddy soil urease, organic carbon, and annual yield relative to other conditions. The average organic matter and total N associated with the M2 rice management model and conventional N application during the wheat season were 5.13% and 4.95% higher, respectively, relative to the use of a reduced N application rate during the wheat season. Similarly, the average total carbon content and annual yields were 6.61% and 5.56% higher under the model M2 with conventional N application during the wheat season, respectively, relative to reduced N application after the two-year study period. These findings indicate that production and carbon fixation in paddy fields can be optimized through a conventional N application rate during the wheat season, and an M2 N management model during the rice season in southern China under a wheat-rice rotation system.Entities:
Keywords: carbon pool; crop yield; nitrogen fertilizer management; wheat–rice rotation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079591 PMCID: PMC9460205 DOI: 10.3390/plants11172209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Meteorological data of the experimental area, including temperature and rain full in 2017–2019.
The effects of N fertilizer management on the nutrient contents of the paddy field at the maturity stage.
| Year | Treatment | Organic Matter | Total | Available Phosphorus | Available | Ammoniacal | Nitrate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Nc | M0 | 16.59k | 1.44g | 21.71o | 39.29o | 21.66j | 10.22o |
| M1 | 17.73hi | 1.51f | 31.36k | 56.26h | 17.92m | 15.32f | ||
| M2 | 25.43bc | 1.68c | 41.54c | 57.03f | 22.28i | 16.17e | ||
| M3 | 16.84jk | 1.41g | 35.37i | 55.40i | 35.43b | 11.16m | ||
| average | 19.15 | 1.51 | 32.50 | 52.00 | 24.32 | 13.22 | ||
| Nr | M0 | 21.62e | 1.28h | 37.37h | 49.42l | 32.34e | 13.23j | |
| M1 | 17.08ijk | 1.41g | 23.72n | 37.47p | 17.34n | 10.33o | ||
| M2 | 24.67c | 1.63d | 40.47e | 57.47e | 32.24e | 17.41c | ||
| M3 | 20.74f | 1.51f | 37.52h | 53.80j | 28.72g | 11.77k | ||
| average | 21.03 | 1.46 | 34.77 | 49.54 | 27.66 | 13.19 | ||
|
| Nc | M0 | 17.84hi | 1.62d | 26.32l | 42.52m | 22.46i | 10.92n |
| M1 | 18.74g | 1.72bc | 39.67f | 59.58c | 19.84k | 16.98d | ||
| M2 | 27.58a | 1.96a | 43.85a | 60.17b | 24.67h | 17.61b | ||
| M3 | 17.62hij | 1.63d | 33.75j | 58.53d | 37.44a | 13.54i | ||
| average | 20.45 | 1.74 | 35.90 | 55.20 | 26.10 | 14.76 | ||
| Nr | M0 | 17.96gh | 1.63d | 25.49m | 40.28n | 18.50l | 11.43l | |
| M1 | 21.82de | 1.58e | 41.06d | 56.43g | 30.74f | 13.82h | ||
| M2 | 25.73b | 1.75b | 39.01g | 52.11k | 34.28c | 14.95g | ||
| M3 | 22.58d | 1.73b | 43.19b | 60.66a | 33.43d | 18.02a | ||
| average | 22.02 | 1.67 | 37.19 | 52.37 | 29.24 | 14.56 | ||
|
| Y | 71.06 ** | 814.85 ** | 2872.28 ** | 1011.584 ** | 678.06 ** | 3954.26 ** | |
| N | 834.77 ** | 1.63 ns | 1653.64 ** | 917.62 ** | 499.89 ** | 537.520 ** | ||
| M | 454.85 ** | 245.43 ** | 1971.97 ** | 803.61 ** | 9578.34 ** | 1399.28 ** | ||
| Y × N | 1.14 ns | 27.24 ** | 120.07 ** | 45.18 ** | 9.61 * | 25.84 ** | ||
| Y × M | 1.07 ns | 2.61 ns | 504.13 ** | 3.18 * | 13.53 ** | 157.64 ** | ||
| N × M | 137.39 ** | 36.19 ** | 249.85 ** | 163.47 ** | 4483.36 ** | 2167.34 ** | ||
| Y × N × M | 1.44 ns | 2.94 ns | 251.59 ** | 4.61 ** | 4.76 * | 45.86 ** | ||
Y: year; N: nitrogen rate; M: nitrogen management; Nc and Nr represent the conventional nitrogen application and reduced nitrogen application in the wheat season, respectively. M0 represents zero N was used in rice season; M1, M2, and M3 represent the use of an application rate of 150 kg/hm2 N in the rice season, three N management models were applied, in which the application ratio of base:tiller:panicle fertilizer was 20%:20%:60%, 30%:30%:40%, and 40%:40%:20%, respectively. Lower-case letters indicate that the physical and chemical properties of the paddy field are significantly different among the treatments (p < 0.05, LSD method). * and ** mean significance at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, and ns mean no significant, respectively.
Figure 2Effects of N application rate in the wheat season and N management in the rice season on paddy soil urease. JS: jointing stage; HS: heading stage; MS: maturity stage; (A) and (B) represent the conventional nitrogen application (WNc) in two years in the wheat season, (C) and (D) represent the reduced nitrogen application (WNr) in two years in the wheat season. M0 represents zero N was used in the rice season; M1, M2, and M3 represent the use of an application rate of 150 kg/hm2 N in the rice season, and three N management models were applied, in which the application ratio of base:tiller:panicle fertilizer was 20%:20%:60%, 30%:30%:40%, and 40%:40%:20%, respectively. Lower-case letters indicate that the soil urease levels were significantly different among the treatments (p < 0.05, LSD method).
Effects of different nitrogen treatments on soil carbon pool components in paddy fields.
| Year | Treatment | TOC | DOC | MOC | EOC | CPI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/kg | mg/kg | mg/kg | g/kg | ||||
|
| Nc | M0 | 15.94def | 138.34c | 160.83p | 3.34a | 0.29ef |
| M1 | 16.61cd | 138.05c | 196.67j | 3.12bc | 0.31e | ||
| M2 | 17.78b | 137.88c | 163.07o | 3.05cd | 0.36cd | ||
| M3 | 17.64b | 136.79d | 213.33f | 3.01d | 0.37c | ||
| average | 16.99 | 137.77 | 183.46 | 3.13 | 0.34 | ||
| Nr | M0 | 15.62ef | 123.70g | 165.85n | 2.79e | 0.22ij | |
| M1 | 16.09def | 123.59g | 286.83d | 2.74e | 0.25gh | ||
| M2 | 16.36cde | 122.33h | 197.70i | 2.74e | 0.27fg | ||
| M3 | 18.147b | 114.69j | 328.14a | 2.60f | 0.40b | ||
| average | 16.55 | 121.08 | 244.63 | 2.72 | 0.29 | ||
|
| Nc | M0 | 16.64cd | 140.30a | 169.99m | 3.40a | 0.26gh |
| M1 | 17.80b | 139.12b | 207.25h | 3.34a | 0.34d | ||
| M2 | 17.67b | 138.95b | 173.84l | 3.31a | 0.36cd | ||
| M3 | 17.96b | 138.06c | 224.24e | 3.21b | 0.36cd | ||
| average | 17.52 | 139.11 | 193.83 | 3.32 | 0.33 | ||
| Nr | M0 | 15.57f | 125.76e | 175.40k | 3.04cd | 0.21j | |
| M1 | 15.74ef | 125.57e | 296.78c | 2.95d | 0.24hi | ||
| M2 | 16.90c | 124.67f | 208.18g | 2.76e | 0.29ef | ||
| M3 | 19.02a | 116.86i | 308.62b | 2.73e | 0.44a | ||
| average | 16.81 | 123.22 | 247.25 | 2.87 | 0.30 | ||
|
| Y | 11.11 ** | 361.304 ** | 5546.40 ** | 112.27 ** | 0.48 ns | |
| N | 24.12 ** | 31,687.68 ** | 4316.56 ** | 696.28 ** | 124.54 ** | ||
| M | 66.64 ** | 745.29 ** | 3037.13 ** | 46.18 ** | 303.15 ** | ||
| Y × N | 1.31 ns | 18.825 ** | 1976.77 ** | 1.16 ns | 1.94 ns | ||
| Y × M | 0.46 ns | 1.21 ns | 1712.41 ** | 0.98 ns | 4.48 * | ||
| N × M | 15.96 ** | 385.38 ** | 6661.77 ** | 0.97 ns | 74.55 ** | ||
| Y × N × M | 5.09 ** | 1.80 ns | 1880.53 ** | 7.23 ** | 6.73 ** | ||
Y: year; N: nitrogen rate; M: nitrogen management. TOC: total organic carbon; DOC: dissolved organic carbon; MOC: microbial carbon; EOC: easily oxidizable carbon; CPI: carbon pool index. Nc and Nr represent the conventional nitrogen application and reduced nitrogen application in the wheat season, respectively. M0 represents zero N was used in rice season; M1, M2, and M3 represent the use of an application rate of 150 kg/hm2 N in the rice season, and three N management models were applied, in which the application ratio of base:tiller:panicle fertilizer was 20%:20%:60%, 30%:30%:40%, and 40%:40%:20%, respectively. Lower-case letters indicate that the soil carbon pool components were significantly different among the treatments (p < 0.05, LSD method). * and ** mean significance at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, and ns mean no significant, respectively.
Figure 3Effects of N management optimization in the rice season and N application rate in the wheat season on the crop yield. WNc and WNr represent the conventional nitrogen application and reduced nitrogen application in the wheat season, respectively. M0 represents zero N was used in rice season; M1, M2, and M3 represent the use of an application rate of 150 kg/hm2 N in the rice season, and three N management models were applied, in which the application ratio of base:tiller:panicle fertilizer was 20%:20%:60%, 30%:30%:40%, and 40%:40%:20%, respectively. Lower-case letters indicate that the annual crop yield was significantly different among the treatments (p < 0.05, LSD method).