| Literature DB >> 36079459 |
Karolina Waszkowska1, Anastasiia Krupka2, Vitaliy Smokal2, Oksana Kharchenko2, Anna Migalska-Zalas3, Mykhaylo Frasinyuk4, Robert Wielgosz5, Anatoliy Andrushchak6, Bouchta Sahraoui7.
Abstract
In this study, new photonics architectures and aurone-based methacrylic polymers were designed and synthesized for their optical and nonlinear optical properties. The studied polymeric thin films were deposited by spin coating method. SHG and THG effects were measured via Maker fringe technique in transmission mode and determined using theoretical models. Investigations involved the theoretical quantum chemical calculation of dipole moments, frontier molecular orbital HOMO and LUMO energies, and first (β) and second (γ) hyperpolarizabilities. We determined the impact of the substitution in the para position of the phenyl ring and at the dipole moment of the chromophore on the nonlinear optical properties of the investigated polymers. The presented theoretical and experimental studies provide important information with respect to the design of methacrylic-based polymeric thin film devices and supplement existing knowledge with respect to their nonlinear behaviour.Entities:
Keywords: aurone-containing polymers; first (β) and second (γ) hyperpolarizabilities; methacrylic polymers; nonlinear optical susceptibility; second harmonic generation; third harmonic generation
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079459 PMCID: PMC9457660 DOI: 10.3390/ma15176076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Aurone-based methacrylic polymers.
Figure 2Experimental setup for SHG and THG measurement. After passing the sample, the laser beam was cut off with an interference filter that does not pass radiation at this wavelength. To collect the SHG signal, a 532 nm filter was used, whereas a 355 nm filter was used for the THG signal.
Figure 3Normalized absorption spectra of P1, P2 and P3 thin films.
Absorption peaks and values of absorption coefficients of P1, P2 and P3 thin films.
| Sample | λabs (nm) | α(355nm) (103 cm−1) |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | 452 | 18.30 |
| P2 | 320; 375 | 11.84 |
| P3 | 316; 382 | 15.14 |
Figure 4SHG and THG responses as a function of incident angle in P1, P2 and P3 thin films with P−polarized (SHG) and S−polarized (THG) laser beams.
Second- and third-order NLO susceptibilities (χ(2), χ(3)) of P1, P2 and P3 polymers.
| Sample | Thickness d (μm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | P | S | P | ||
| Y-cut quartz [ | 1000 | 1.00 | - | ||
| Silica glass [ | 1000 | - | 2.00 | ||
| P1 | 0.500 | 2.03 | 29.54 | 229.2 | 226.1 |
| P2 [ | 0.300 | 0.34 | 0.67 | 3.9 | 4.2 |
| P3 | 0.317 | 0.64 | 2.91 | 96.7 | 97.7 |
Figure 5Dependence of generated second harmonic intensities on output laser polarization.
Figure 6Frontier molecular orbitals HOMO and LUMO of compounds P1 and P3 and the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) process between donor and acceptor groups of compounds P1 and P3.
Dipole moment, HOMO and LUMO energy levels and theoretical bandgap ((Eg)HOMO–LUMO).
| Sample | Dipole Moment (D) | HOMO (eV) | LUMO (eV) | (Eg)HOMO–LUMO (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 8.71 | −5.447 | −2.376 | 3.071 |
| P2 | 4.71 | −6.368 | −2.769 | 3.599 |
| P3 | 5.98 | −6.831 | −3.441 | 3.391 |
Frequency-dependent βtot(−2ω;ω,ω) and γtot(−3ω;ω,ω,ω) values at ω= 0.042827, a.u. = 1064 nm, B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) for P1–P3 and comparison with experimental data: χ(2) and χ(3) at P polarization.
| Sample | Calculations B3LYP/6-311++G (d,p) | Experiment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| βtot × 10−30, esu | γtot × 10−36, esu | |||
| P1 | 907.044 | 984.868 | 29.54 | 226.1 |
| P2 | 114.946 | 165.064 | 0.67 | 4.2 |
| P3 | 177.302 | 425.405 | 2.91 | 97.7 |