| Literature DB >> 36079424 |
Shuolin Zhou1, Junzhuo Bai1, Keying Huang1, Xinlu Ye1, Yingqing Peng1, Min Lei1.
Abstract
Developing a rapid and reliable method for measuring the photoreactivity of TiO2 pigments is of great importance for industrial application. The photoactivity of industrial TiO2 pigments were evaluated via the photodegradation of a model azo dye, methyl orange (MO), in the present work. The TiO2 pigments were characterized by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The photoactivity test results showed that the anatase TiO2 pigment was responsible for accelerating MO degradation, while the rutile pigment acted as a stabilizer, and effective UV absorber retarded the photodegradation of MO. It was found that the photodegradation of MO was driven mainly by photoholes (h+) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH), in the presence of TiO2 pigment with high photoactivity. With the help of the degradation intermediates during the photodegradation process and the calculated data, the preliminary degradation mechanism including azo bond cleaving, h+ oxidation, and hydroxylated products' generation for MO was also elucidated. The photoactivity of TiO2 pigments can be rapidly evaluated in this work, which would be an efficient approach for assessing the product quality control and the end-use performance of TiO2 pigments.Entities:
Keywords: mechanism; methyl orange; photoactivity; photodegradation; titanium dioxide pigment
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079424 PMCID: PMC9457480 DOI: 10.3390/ma15176044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Main characterization of industrial TiO2 pigments.
| TiO2 Pigment Sample | Composition | Surface Treatment | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | TiO2 (anatase, >98%) | SiO2/Al2O3 | Paints, fiber, rubber, metallurgy, etc. |
| P2 | TiO2 (rutile, >98%) | None | - |
| P3 | TiO2 (rutile, >92%) | SiO2/Al2O3 | Coatings, rubber, plastic, etc. |
Figure 1The apparatus for photoactivity performance testing.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of the samples.
Figure 3SEM images of the samples: (a) P1; (b) P2; (c) P3.
Figure 4UV–vis spectra of the samples.
Figure 5PL spectra of the samples with the excitation wavelength of 300 nm.
Figure 6(a) Typical UV–vis spectra of MO during the photocatalytic degradation process at the initial concentration 30 μmol/L in an aqueous pigment P1 (1.0 g/L) and natural pH; (b) photodegradation curves of MO over different TiO2 pigments under UV light irradiation.
Figure 7Effects of various reactive species scavengers on the photodegradation of MO by pigment P1.
Point charges and bond length on atoms of MO at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level.
| Atom Label | Point Charges | Bond | Bond Length (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 0.239 | C1–C2 | 1.4419 |
| C2 | −0.886 | C2–C3 | 1.4369 |
| C3 | 0.070 | C3–C4 | 1.3639 |
| C4 | −0.070 | C4–C5 | 1.4419 |
| C5 | 0.402 | C5–C6 | 1.4471 |
| C6 | −0.138 | C6–C1 | 1.3618 |
| N7 | 0.055 | N7–C2 | 1.3356 |
| N8 | −0.088 | N7–N8 | 1.3267 |
| C9 | −0.214 | C9–C10 | 1.4593 |
| C10 | −0.637 | C10–C11 | 1.4613 |
| C11 | 0.066 | O11–C12 | 1.3543 |
| C12 | 0.550 | O12–C13 | 1.4505 |
| C13 | −0.776 | C13–C14 | 1.4455 |
| C14 | 0.060 | C14–C9 | 1.3552 |
| S15 | 1.341 | S15–C10 | 1.8431 |
| N16 | −0.079 | N16–C5 | 1.3401 |
| C17 | −0.285 | N16–C17 | 1.4735 |
| C18 | −0.276 | N16–C18 | 1.4737 |
| O19 | −0.467 | S15–O19 | 1.4557 |
| O20 | −0.465 | S15–O20 | 1.4558 |
| O21 | −0.320 | S15–O21 | 1.6345 |
Figure 8Proposed pathways of photodegradation of MO.