| Literature DB >> 36078844 |
Gerhard Ruedl1, Markus Posch1, Katja Tecklenburg2, Alois Schranz2, Martin Faulhaber1, Elena Pocecco1, Martin Burtscher1.
Abstract
AIM: to evaluate if ACL injuries are associated with recreational skiers using rented skis and whether individual factors, ski geometry parameters and standing heights differ between skiers who rented or owned skis. A retrospective questionnaire-based, case-control study of ACL-injured and uninjured recreational skiers was conducted during six winter seasons. Age, sex, body height, body weight, nationality, ownership of skis, skill level, risk-taking behavior, ski length, side-cut radius, widths of the tip, waist, and tail, and the standing heights at the front and rear components of the ski binding were assessed. Additionally, ratios between ski widths and a standing height ratio were calculated. Altogether, 1780 skiers (48.9% females) with a mean age of 39.2 ± 13.0 years participated, of whom 22.0% sustained an ACL injury and 32.3% rented skis. ACL injury risk was significantly associated with rented skis (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.5-4.0). Compared to skiers using own skis, participants who rented skis were more likely female, smaller and lighter, tourists, less skilled and more cautious. In comparison to owned skis, rented skis showed significantly lower mean values in ski length, side-cut radius, ski widths, and for the three ski widths ratios. Additionally, standing heights were significantly lower while standing height ratio was higher for rented skis. Beside individual factors, equipment-related factors should be considered when renting skis in order to reduce ACL injury risk.Entities:
Keywords: ACL injury; alpine skiing; rented skis; risk factors; ski geometry; ski widths; standing height
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078844 PMCID: PMC9518475 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191711124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Ski geometry characteristics (ski length, side-cut radius, and widths of the tip, waist and tail of the ski). With permission from https://www.gearx.com/blog/knowledge/skiing/ski-shape-profile/, accessed on 2 September 2022.
Univariate comparison of individual and ski-geometry-related risk factors between skiers with own skis and with rented skis.
| Own Skis | Rented Skis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ACL injury (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Uninjured | 84.8 ( | 63.7 ( | |
| Injured | 15.2 ( | 36.3 ( | |
| Sex (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Male | 54.0 ( | 45.0 ( | |
| Female | 46.0 ( | 55.0 ( | |
| Age (years) | 39.1 ± 13.4 ( | 39.5 ± 12.0 ( | 0.185 |
| Body height (cm) | 174.0 ± 8.6 ( | 173.2 ± 9.0 ( | 0.010 |
| Body weight (kg) | 75.3 ± 14.0 ( | 73.4 ± 13.0 ( | 0.019 |
| Nationality (%) | <0.001 | ||
| Austria | 37.9 ( | 16.5 ( | |
| Others | 62.1 ( | 83.5 ( | |
| Skill level (%) | <0.001 | ||
| More skilled | 80.1 ( | 54.1 ( | |
| Less skilled | 19.9 ( | 45.9 ( | |
| Risk-taking behavior (%) | 0.032 | ||
| More cautious | 64.3 ( | 69.9 ( | |
| riskier | 35.7 ( | 30.4 ( | |
| Ski length (cm) | 166.0 ± 9.6 ( | 161.8 ± 9.4 ( | <0.001 |
| Relative ski length (%) | 95.4 ± 3.8 ( | 93.5 ± 3.5 ( | <0.001 |
| Side-cut radius (m) | 14.6 ± 2.8 ( | 13.8 ± 2.3 ( | <0.001 |
| Tip width (mm) | 121.3 ± 8.1 ( | 119.5 ± 7.2 ( | 0.001 |
| Waist width (mm) | 75.8 ± 9.4 ( | 73.3 ± 5.4 ( | <0.001 |
| Tail width (mm) | 107.1 ± 8.1 ( | 104.8 ± 7.0 ( | <0.001 |
| Waist-to-tip width ratio (%) | 63.4 ± 6.3 ( | 61.7 ± 5.0 ( | 0.001 |
| Waist-to-tail width ratio (%) | 71.8 ± 6.5 ( | 70.3 ± 5.3 ( | 0.004 |
| Tail-to-tip width ratio (%) | 88.5 ± 7.3 ( | 88.0 ± 7.7 ( | 0.042 |
| Standing height front (mm) | 40.6 ± 5.6 ( | 37.8 ± 5.0 ( | <0.001 |
| Standing height back (mm) | 45.5 ± 6.0 ( | 42.1 ± 6.1 ( | <0.001 |
| Standing height ratio (%) | 89.5 ± 6.7 ( | 90.2 ± 7.5 ( | 0.030 |