| Literature DB >> 36078577 |
Wuxue Cheng1,2, Yajun Rao1,2, Yixin Tang1,2, Jiajia Yang1,2, Yuxin Chen1,2, Li Peng1,2, Jiangcheng Hao3.
Abstract
Crime prevention and governance play critical roles in public security management. Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture in Sichuan Province has a high crime rate, and spatio-temporal analysis of crime in this region could assist with public security management. Therefore, Liangshan Prefecture was selected as the research object in this study. The spatial crime data were obtained from China Judgments Online, and property crime, violent crime, and special crime (i.e., pornography, gambling, drugs, and guns) were analyzed. The findings were as follows. In terms of time characteristics (month, day, and hour), property crime tended to occur in autumn and winter, in the early month, on Wednesdays and Fridays, and at early morning. Violent crime tended to occur in winter and spring, on Mondays and Thursdays, and at night. Special crime occurred in spring and autumn, on Tuesdays, and in the daytime. In terms of spatial features, the central region of Liangshan Prefecture was the focal area for crime. There were obvious low-aggregation areas in the western region for special crime. The eastern region exhibited a high incidence of various crimes. Regarding the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics from 2013 to 2019, there were some obvious hotspots of violent and property crime in downtown and surrounding townships of Xichang City, which is the capital of Liangshan Prefecture. During the study period, the incidence of special crime has an obvious downward trend which shows that there are more new cold spots.Entities:
Keywords: crime hotspots; property crime; spatio-temporal cube; spatio-temporal evolution pattern of crime; violent crime
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078577 PMCID: PMC9518591 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Location of the study area.
Figure 2Standardized monthly crime intensity index and number of cases.
Figure 3Standardized weekly crime intensity index and number of cases.
Figure 4Standardized day scale crime intensity index and number of cases.
Figure 5Standardized hourly scale crime intensity index and number of cases.
Spatial autocorrelation results of various crime.
| Type of Crime | Z | I | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| property crime | 6.1161 | 0.0678 | 0.0060 |
| Violent crime | 5.3507 | 0.0877 | 0.0040 |
| Special crime | 4.8380 | 0.0845 | 0.0060 |
Figure 6Local spatial autocorrelation results for the various crime: (a) Property crime; (b) Violent crime; (c) Special crime; The figures in brackets represent the number of crimes of all kinds.
Figure 7Global spatial autocorrelation Z scores of crime point distribution.
Figure 8Incident time cycle.
Figure 9Time sequence sample autocorrelation function Z score diagram.
Figure 10Spatio-temporal evolution pattern of crime: (a) Property crime; (b) Violent crime; (c) Special crime.