| Literature DB >> 36078514 |
Fangjie Cao1, Yun Qiu1, Qianxin Wang1, Yan Zou2.
Abstract
The low-carbon city has become an important global urban development-oriented goal. One important aspect of urban space is low-carbon urban planning, which has a vital role in urban carbon emissions. Which types of urban form and function allocations are conducive to reducing carbon emissions is therefore a key issue. In this study, the Futian and Luohu Districts of Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China, are taken as an example to investigate this issue. Firstly, a "head/tail" breaks method based on the third fractal theory is adopted to obtain the minimum evaluation parcel of urban space. Then, the Landscape Shape Index (LSI), Fragmentation Index (C), Shannon's Diversity Index (SHDI), and Density of Public Facilities (Den) are used to evaluate the form and function allocation of each parcel. In addition, the CO2 concentration distribution in this study area is acquired from remote sensing satellite data. Finally, the relationships between urban form, function allocation, and CO2 concentration are obtained. The results show that the lower the urban form index or the higher the urban function index, the less the CO2 concentration. To verify this conclusion, three experiments are designed and carried out. In experiment A, the CO2 concentration of the tested area is reduced by 14.31% by decreasing the LSI and C by 6.1% and 9.4%, respectively. In experiment B, the CO2 concentration is reduced by 15.15% by increasing the SHDI and Den by 16.3% and 12.1%, respectively. In experiment C, the CO2 concentration is reduced by 27.72% when the urban form and function are adjusted in the same was as in experiments A and B.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 concentration; Landscape Shape Index; OSM; POI; low-carbon urban planning
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078514 PMCID: PMC9518180 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710805
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the study area.
List of data sources.
| Type of Data | Data Sources | Data Usage | Time of Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| POIs data | Dominant function identification and landscape index calculation | 2022 | |
| OpenStreetMap | Division of evaluation parcels | 2022 | |
| Landsat-8 image | CO2 concentration calculation | 2021 |
Figure 2Schematic diagram of data distribution in the study area. (a) POIs spatial distribution. (b) OSM spatial distribution.
Figure 3Overall framework.
Figure 4Induction pattern of natural street parcels. (a) initial state. (b) 1st breaks. (c) 2nd breaks. (d) final state.
POIs function classification table.
| Function Type | Corresponding POI Classification |
|---|---|
| Commercial | Restaurant, cafe, bar, tea house, hotel, cinema, shopping mall, shopping center, wholesale market, monopoly store, supermarket, convenience store, home building materials store, digital appliance, market, shop, beauty salon, barbershop, manicure, resort, KTV, theater, dance hall, internet bar, playground, bathing and massage, leisure plaza, company, bank, insurance, business hall, training institution, bookstore, gas station, driving school (registration offices), pet hospital, printing shop |
| Residential | Residence, apartment, dormitory, villa |
| Government and sports leisure service | Government, fire department, police station, court, industry and commerce bureau, tax bureau, finance bureau, customs, embassy, association, foundation, welfare institution, stadium, swimming pool, basketball court, badminton court |
| Education and cultural facilities | Kindergarten, nursery school, primary school, middle school, high school, university, adult education, vocational school, special education school, private school, scientific research institution, museum, library, conference center |
| Medical and health service | Hospital, children’s hospital, clinic, emergency center, psychiatric hospital, infectious disease hospital, tuberculosis, eye hospital |
| Park Square | Park, green space, botanical garden, water |
| Transportation | Bus station, high-speed train station, railway station, subway station, driving school (training field) |
| Industrial | Factory, processing plant, logistics, warehousing, water purification plants |
| Other | Graveyard, public toilet, parking lot, water supply, electricity, garbage disposal site, temple |
Landscape index calculation.
| Landscape Index | Calculation Formula | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Landscape Shape Index |
| It reflects the fractal dimension and morphological characteristics of urban landscape elements. |
| Fragmentation Index |
| It reflects the degree of fragmentation of landscape elements |
| Shannon’s Diversity Index |
| It reflects the diversity of urban public facilities. |
| Density of Public Facilities |
| It reflects the density of urban public facilities. |
is the Landscape Shape Index of parcel ; is the sum of the boundary lengths of landscape patches in parcel ; is the area of AOI in parcel ; is the Fragmentation Index of parcel ; is the number of patches in parcel ; is the number of POI types in parcel ; is the total number of POI categories; is the Shannon’s Diversity Index of parcel ; is the proportion of the number of type POIs in all POIs in parcel ; is the number of POI types in parcel ; is the Density of Public Facilities in parcel ; is the number of public facility POIs in parcel ; is the area of the building in parcel ; is the ID of the evaluation parcel.
Figure 5Evaluation parcel under two segmentation methods. (a) the scaling form under the head/tail breaks method. (b) the minimum evaluation parcel presented with the traditional “thinning expansion” segmentation method.
Figure 6Training and testing efficiencies. (a) training efficiencies. (b) testing efficiencies.
Statistics of POI and landscape dominant function parcel.
| ID | Type | POI Number | Weight | Number of Functional Parcels | Functional Parcel Area/km2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commercial | 194,970 | 1.834312 | 65 | 17.4 |
| 2 | Residential | 25,569 | 1.640193 | 100 | 55.27 |
| 3 | Government and sports leisure service | 5811 | 2.648612 | 10 | 3.13 |
| 4 | Education and cultural facilities | 7506 | 2.438533 | 21 | 6.81 |
| 5 | Medical and health service | 2710 | 2.461524 | 2 | 0.81 |
| 6 | Park Square | 971 | 2.158362 | 67 | 54.43 |
| 7 | Transportation | 5841 | 2.306906 | 8 | 16.78 |
| 8 | Industrial | 4234 | 1.539243 | 10 | 3.91 |
| 9 | Other | 1254 | 2.153471 | 4 | 2.47 |
Figure 7Dominant function partition of study area.
Figure 8Distribution of CO2 concentration in the study area (the yellow dotted line is the abnormal value area).
Figure 9Landscape Index Measurement and CO2 concentration contribution.
Figure 10Current situation of landscape indices in sample area and simulation area.
Figure 11Optimized landscape index. (a) LSI. (b) C. (c) SHDI. (d) Den.
Figure 12Simulation diagram of CO2 concentration distribution under different schemes. (a) current situation. (b) experiment A. (c) experiment B. (d) experiment C.