| Literature DB >> 36078434 |
María Luisa Martín Sánchez1, José M Oliva-Lozano2, Jorge García-Unanue3, Peter Krustrup4, Jose Luis Felipe1, Víctor Moreno-Pérez5, Leonor Gallardo3, Javier Sánchez-Sánchez1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the physical demands for elite female referees during competitive matches and to evaluate the relationship between match performance and fitness levels. Seventeen female elite field referees were fitness-tested (29.0 ± 5.2 (SD) years, 163.8 ± 6.7 cm, 54.0 ± 5.1 kg, Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIR1) performance 1610 ± 319 m) and were analysed during a total of 187 football matches. Global positioning systems (GPS) were used in this research. The physical demands were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the second half of matches compared to the first half. Regarding the acceleration-related variables, the female referees revealed a higher number of high-intensity actions in the first half compared to the second half. However, higher low-intensity demands were observed for the females referees in the second half compared to the first half in the total number of accelerations (ACC) (~70.48 n; ES = 0.61; p < 0.05) and decelerations (DEC) (~71.11 n; ES = 0.62; p < 0.05); total number of ACC in zone 1 (~85.27 n; ES = 0.70; p < 0.05) and DEC in zone 1 (Z1) (~83.98 n; ES = 0.71; p < 0.05); and distance covered accelerating and decelerating in Z1. The distance covered in YYIR1 and the performance in the repeated sprint ability test correlated with the physical demands during matches for female football referees (p < 0.05). In conclusion, this study described the physical performance profile of female football referees and differences between the first and second halves of matches were observed. The results of this study revealed positive correlations between intermittent exercise fitness levels, the repeated sprint ability performance and match performance in female football referees, and thus this information can be implemented in their training plan designs.Entities:
Keywords: load monitoring; officials; performance; soccer; tracking systems
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078434 PMCID: PMC9518354 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Performance of the RSA test (6 × 40 m) for female field referees. * Significant differences between sprints (p < 0.05).
External load variables related to distance covered in elite football matches by female field referees.
| Variables | First Half | Second Half | Sig. ( | ES | 95 % CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total distance (m) | 5007 ± 404 | 4938 ± 392 * | 0.01 | 0.17 | 16.41 | 122.56 |
| Explosive distance (m) | 565 ± 120 | 522 ± 125 * | 0.00 | 0.36 | 32.82 | 54.79 |
| HIBD (m) | 53.7 ± 22.5 | 76.7 ± 41.7 * | 0.00 | 0.72 | −27.80 | −18.12 |
| Sprinting distance (m) | 34.2 ± 43.4 | 33.3 ± 41.9 | 0.76 | 0.02 | −4.91 | 6.73 |
| HSRA (n) | 9.0 ± 5.4 | 8.5 ± 5.1 | 0.11 | 0.10 | −0.12 | 1.13 |
| HSRD (m) | 156.3 ± 99.2 | 152.0 ± 96.2 | 0.50 | 0.04 | −8.22 | 16.81 |
| Maximal Speed (km/h) | 25.5 ± 2.2 | 25.1 ± 2.1 * | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.76 |
* Significant differences between first and second half in female field referees (p < 0.05); ES: effect size; CI: confidence interval; HIBD: High Intensity Break Distance; HSRA: High-Speed Running Actions; HSRD: High-Speed Running Distance.
Figure 2Distance covered in elite football matches by female field referees in different speed zones. * Significant differences between first and second half (p < 0.05).
Relationship between acceleration and deceleration demands of female field referees in match play.
| Variables | First Half | Second Half | Sig. ( | ES | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACC (n) | 1312.0 ± 112.6 | 1382.4 ± 119.0 * | 0.00 | 0.61 | −85.22 | −55.73 |
| DEC (n) | 1314.8 ± 111.4 | 1385.9 ± 118.2 * | 0.00 | 0.62 | −85.95 | −56.26 |
| DECMAX (m/s2) | −4.71 ± 0.83 | −4.46 ± 0.67 * | 0.00 | 0.33 | −0.39 | −0.10 |
| ACCMAX (m/s2) | 4.13 ± 0.75 | 3.96 ± 0.71 * | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.31 |
| ACC/DEC ratio | −5.98 ± 6.16 | −4.76 ± 6.42 * | 0.01 | 0.19 | −2.15 | −0.29 |
| ACC Z1 (n) | 1014.2 ± 115.7 | 1099.4 ± 126.9 * | 0.00 | 0.70 | −99.18 | −71.37 |
| ACC Z2 (n) | 223.4 ± 38.5 | 215.5 ± 40.0 * | 0.00 | 0.20 | 3.71 | 12.07 |
| ACC Z3 (n) | 63.6 ± 17.4 | 58.2 ± 18.5 * | 0.00 | 0.30 | 3.53 | 7.21 |
| ACC Z4 (n) | 10.8 ± 7.2 | 9.3 ± 7.3 * | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 2.26 |
| ACC Z1 (m) | 1057.6 ± 143.3 | 1089.5 ± 156.8 * | 0.00 | 0.21 | −60.08 | −18.46 |
| ACC Z2 (m) | 736.7 ± 97.7 | 734.3 ± 106.1 * | 0.00 | 0.02 | 12.97 | 54.26 |
| ACC Z3 (m) | 286.7 ± 76.3 | 259.1 ± 74.6 * | 0.00 | 0.37 | 19.66 | 49.00 |
| ACC Z4 (m) | 85.4 ± 44.2 | 70.2 ± 44.8 * | 0.00 | 0.34 | 10.54 | 25.26 |
| DEC Z1 (n) | 1022.2 ± 113.0 | 1106.2 ± 124.5 * | 0.00 | 0.71 | −97.88 | −70.08 |
| DEC Z2 (n) | 213.7 ± 36.3 | 210.2 ± 38.5 | 0.09 | 0.09 | −0.61 | 7.60 |
| DEC Z3 (n) | 62.1 ± 16.6 | 55.5 ± 17.5 * | 0.00 | 0.39 | 4.75 | 8.48 |
| DEC Z4 (n) | 16.8 ± 7.9 | 14.1 ± 8.9 * | 0.00 | 0.33 | 1.84 | 3.67 |
| DEC Z1 (m) | 1126.6 ± 154.8 | 1165.8 ± 169.6 * | 0.00 | 0.24 | −51.62 | −12.32 |
| DEC Z2 (m) | 1150.5 ± 173.7 | 1116.9 ± 177.6 | 0.74 | 0.19 | −11.53 | 16.30 |
| DEC Z3 (m) | 495.3 ± 129.3 | 460.9 ± 132.6 * | 0.00 | 0.26 | 18.30 | 36.88 |
| DEC Z4 (m) | 101.8 ± 72.4 | 83.9 ± 64.5 * | 0.00 | 0.26 | 9.92 | 20.50 |
* Significant differences between first and second half in female elite referees (p < 0.05); CI: confidence interval; ES: effect size; ACC: Accelerations; DEC: Decelerations.
Time speed in the RSA test and distance in Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 in female field referees’ fitness tests.
| Variables | RSATT | RSABEST | % RSABEST | % RSADIFF | Yo-Yo Intermittent Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total distance (m) | −0.229 | −0.220 | 0.018 | 0.141 | 0.442 |
| Explosive distance (m) | −0.346 | −0.307 | −0.105 | −0.054 | 0.465 * |
| HIBD (m) | −0.365 | −0.333 | −0.074 | −0.013 | 0.508 * |
| Sprint distance (m) | −0.656 ** | −0.668 ** | 0.267 | 0.317 | 0.279 |
| HSRA (n) | −0.332 | −0.297 | −0.097 | 0.072 | 0.306 |
| HSRD (m) | −0.503 * | −0.489 * | 0.075 | 0.203 | 0.329 |
| Maximal Speed (km/h) | −0.632 ** | −0.634 ** | 0.206 | 0.206 | 0.207 |
| ACC (n) | 0.550 * | 0.513 * | 0.047 | 0.022 | −0.443 |
| DEC (n) | 0.526 * | 0.490 * | 0.052 | 0.030 | −0.424 |
| ACC Z4 (n) | −0.310 | −0.275 | −0.094 | 0.048 | 0.531 * |
| DEC Z4 (n) | −0.447 * | −0.412 | −0.061 | −0.021 | 0.462 * |
| ACC Z4 (m) | −0.393 | −0.359 | −0.066 | 0.121 | 0.535 * |
| DEC Z4 (m) | −0.509 * | −0.490 * | 0.043 | 0.100 | 0.367 |
* Significant correlation between match variables and fitness tests in female field referees (p < 0.05). ** Significant correlation between match variables and fitness tests in female field referees (p < 0.01). HIBD: High-Intensity Break Distance; HSRA: High-Speed Running Actions; HSRD: High-Speed Running Distance; RSA: Repeat Sprint Ability Test; % RSADIFF: percentage of difference between the best and worst sprint during the RSA test; ACC: Accelerations; DEC: Decelerations.