| Literature DB >> 36078137 |
Juan Wang1, Shuang Gao1, Yufei Zhao1, Taibing Fan2, Mingkui Zhang3, Dehua Chang4.
Abstract
Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell (UC-MSC) sheets have attracted much attention in cell therapy. However, the culture media and coating matrix used for the preparation of UC-MSC sheets have not been safe enough to comply with current clinical drug standards. Moreover, the UC-MSC sheet preservation systems developed before did not comply with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) regulations. In this study, the culture medium and coating matrix were developed for UC-MSC sheet production to comply with clinical drug standards. Additionally, the GMP-compliant preservation solution and method for the UC-MSC sheet were developed. Then, quality standards of the UC-MSC sheet were formulated according to national and international regulations for drugs. Finally, the production process of UC-MSC sheets on a large scale was standardized, and three batches of trial production were conducted and tested to meet the established quality standards. This research provides the possibility for clinical trials of UC-MSC sheet products in the development stage of new drugs and lays the foundation for industrial large-scale production after the new drug is launched.Entities:
Keywords: large-scale production; preservation; umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell sheet
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078137 PMCID: PMC9454431 DOI: 10.3390/cells11172732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Figure 1The umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (UC−MSC) sheet production process conformation. (A) Morphology of the UC−MSC sheets. (B) Statistics of diameters of the UC−MSC sheets. (C) Statistical analysis of total cell amount per UC−MSC sheet. (D) Statistical analysis of cell viability of the UC−MSC sheets.
Figure 2The UC−MSC sheet preservation solution selection. (A) Morphology of the UC−MSC sheet. (B) Statistics of cell sheet diameters. (C) Statistical analysis of total cell amount per UC−MSC sheet. (D) Statistical analysis of cell viability of the UC−MSC sheets.
Quality standards of UC−MSC sheet.
| Categories | Items | Methods | Quality Standards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical and chemical properties | * Cell sheet appearance | Visual observation | White round sheet structure with smooth surface and neat edges |
| * Cell sheet diameter | Ruler method | 35–50 mm | |
| * Cell amount per cell sheet | Acridine Orange and Propidium Iodide (AOPI) staining and automatic fluorescent cell counter detection | 3–6 × 107 cells/cell sheet | |
| * Cell viability | AOPI staining and automatic fluorescent cell counter detection | ≥70% | |
| * Cell apoptosis detection | Annexin V and Propidium Iodide (PI) staining and flow cytometry detection | Normal cells ≥ 70% | |
| Biological characteristics | * Cell surface marker CD73 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≥ 95% |
| * Cell surface marker CD90 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≥ 95% | |
| * Cell surface marker CD105 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≥ 95% | |
| * Cell surface marker CD11b detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| * Cell surface marker CD19 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| * Cell surface marker CD34 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| * Cell surface marker CD45 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| * Cell surface marker HLA-DR detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| Induced osteoblast differentiation | Induce differentiation and alizarin red staining | Positive for alizarin red staining | |
| Induced adipocyte differentiation | Induce differentiation and Oil Red O staining | Positive for Oil Red O staining | |
| Induced chondroblast differentiation | Induce differentiation and alcian blue staining | Positive for alcian blue staining | |
| Biological functions | Lymphocyte proliferation inhibition test | Co-culture with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), BrdU staining, and flow cytometry detection | Inhibit lymphocyte proliferation |
| Th1 lymphocyte inhibition test | Co-culture with PBMCs, fluorescent antibody staining, and flow cytometry detection | Inhibit Th1 lymphocyte differentiation | |
| Inflammatory factor- tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) secretion inhibition test | Co-culture with PBMCs and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detection | Inhibit TNFα secretion | |
| * Secretory factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| * Secretory factor hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| Secretory factor interleukin-6 (IL-6) detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| Secretory factor interleukin-8 (IL-8) detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| Safety | * STR authentication | Fluorescence short tandem repeat (STR) method | Single peak at detection sites |
| * Gentamicin residue detection | ELISA | ≤0.5 ng/cell sheet | |
| * Bovine serum albumin (BSA) residue detection | ELISA | ≤16.6 ng/cell sheet | |
| * Human serum albumin (HSA) residue detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| * Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) residue detection | ELISA | ≤100 pg/mL | |
| Fibrinogen residue detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| * TrypLE residue detection | ELISA | ≤16.6 ng/cell sheet | |
| * Sterility testing | Membrane filtration method | Negative | |
| * Mycoplasma detection | Culture method | Negative | |
| * Mycoplasma detection | Indicated cell culture method | Negative | |
| * Mycoplasma detection | quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) | Negative | |
| * Endotoxin test | Gel Clot LAL Assay | ≤6.6 EU/cell sheet |
* Release quality standards.
Quality standards of umbilical cord.
| Categories | Items | Methods | Quality Standards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Character | Appearance | Naked eye observation | Complete packaging without leakage |
| Temperature | Thermometry | 2–8 °C | |
| Umbilical cord collection information | Naked eye observation | Complete | |
| Within the warranty period | Naked eye observation | Less than 24 h from umbilical cord collection | |
| Safety | human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) | Colloidal gold method | Negative |
| human hepatitis B virus (HBV) | Colloidal gold method | Negative | |
| human hepatitis C virus (HCV) | Colloidal gold method | Negative | |
| Colloidal gold method | Negative | ||
| human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) | ELISA | Negative | |
| Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) | ELISA | Negative | |
| cytomegalovirus (CMV) | Colloidal gold method | Negative | |
| SARS-CoV-2 | Q-PCR | Negative |
Quality standards of MCB and WCB.
| Categories | Items | Methods | Quality Standards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical and chemical properties | Cell morphology | Microscopic observation | Adherent and spindle-shaped cells |
| Cell amount | AOPI staining and automatic fluorescent cell counter detection | 1.6–2.4 × 106/mL | |
| Cell viability | AOPI staining and automatic fluorescent cell counter detection | ≥80% | |
| Cell apoptosis detection | Annexin V and PI staining and flow cytometry detection | Normal cells ≥ 80% | |
| Biological characteristics | Cell growth curve | CCK-8 assay | Report result |
| Cell cycle analysis | PI staining and flow cytometry detection | Report result | |
| Colony-Forming Unit (CFU) | Single-cell culture in 96-well plates | Report result | |
| Cell surface marker CD73 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≥ 95% | |
| Cell surface marker CD90 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≥ 95% | |
| Cell surface marker CD105 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≥ 95% | |
| Cell surface marker CD11b detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| Cell surface marker CD19 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| Cell surface marker CD34 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| Cell surface marker CD45 detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| Cell surface marker HLA-DR detection | Fluorescent antibody staining and flow cytometry detection | Positive cell proportion ≤ 2% | |
| Induced osteoblast differentiation | Induce differentiation and alizarin red staining | Positive for alizarin red staining | |
| Induced adipocyte differentiation | Induce differentiation and Oil Red O staining | Positive for Oil Red O staining | |
| Induced chondroblast differentiation | Induce differentiation and alcian blue staining | Positive for alcian blue staining | |
| Biological functions | Lymphocyte proliferation inhibition test | Co-culture with PBMCs, BrdU staining, and flow cytometry detection | Inhibit lymphocyte proliferation |
| Th1 lymphocyte inhibition test | Co-culture with PBMCs, fluorescent antibody staining, and flow cytometry detection | Inhibit Th1 lymphocyte differentiation | |
| Inflammatory factor-TNFα secretion inhibition test | Co-culture with PBMCs and ELISA detection | Inhibit TNFα secretion | |
| Secretory factor HGF detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| Secretory factor IL-6 detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| Secretory factor IL-8 detection | ELISA | Report result | |
| Safety | STR authentication | Fluorescence STR method | Single peak at detection sites |
| Telomerase activity detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| Sterility testing | Membrane filtration method | Negative | |
| Mycoplasma detection | Culture method | Negative | |
| Mycoplasma detection | Indicated cell culture method | Negative | |
| Mycoplasma detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * HIV-1 detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * HBV detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * HCV detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * HCMV detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * EBV detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * TP detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * Human cell virus B19 (HB19) detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * Human spore virus type 6 (HHV-6) detection | Q-PCR | Negative | |
| * Retroviral detection | Product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay (PERT) method | Negative | |
| * Bovine virus detection | Cytopathic observation method | Negative | |
| * Bovine virus detection | Hemoabsorption test | Negative | |
| * Bovine virus detection | Fluorescent antibody test | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | Vero cell culture test | Normal cell morphology | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | MRC-5 cell culture test | Normal cell morphology | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | Human MSC culture test | Normal cell morphology | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | Vero cell erythrocyte adsorption and blood coagulation test | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | MRC-5 cell erythrocyte adsorption and blood coagulation test | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | MSC erythrocyte adsorption and blood coagulation test | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | Mouse intraperitoneal and intracerebral vaccination | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | Suckling mouse intraperitoneal and intracerebral vaccination Chinese Pharmacopoeia | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | 5–6 day chicken embryo yolk sac vaccination | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | 9–11 day chicken embryo allantoic vaccination | Negative | |
| * Exogenous virus detection | Erythrocyte adsorption test of 9–11 days chicken embryo allantoic fluid | Negative | |
| * Karyotype analysis | G-band method | 46XX or 46XY | |
| * Tumorigenicity test | Soft Agar Clone Formation Experiment | Negative |
* Only tested in WCB.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the large-scale production of UC−MSC sheets.
Cell surface marker test of cell banks.
| Markers | Positive Cell Proportion | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | ||||
| MCB | WCB | MCB | WCB | MCB | WCB | |
| CD73 | 99.7% | 99.7% | 99.8% | 99.9% | 99.3% | 99.9% |
| CD90 | 99.9% | 99.8% | 99.8% | 99.9% | 99.8% | 99.8% |
| CD105 | 99.8% | 99.9% | 99.8% | 99.5% | 99.9% | 99.9% |
| CD11b | 0.191% | 0.020% | 0.050% | 0.080% | 0.060% | 0.210% |
| CD19 | 0.142% | 0.070% | 0.120% | 0.220% | 0.190% | 0.240% |
| CD34 | 0.122% | 0.020% | 0.040% | 0.060% | 0.140% | 0.140% |
| CD45 | 0.145% | 0.050% | 0.050% | 0.050% | 0.070% | 0.070% |
| HLA-DR | 0.997% | 0.080% | 0.050% | 0.290% | 0.260% | 0.280% |
Safety test of MCB and WCB.
| Items | Results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | ||||
| MCB | WCB | MCB | WCB | MCB | WCB | |
| Telomerase activity detection | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Sterility testing | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Mycoplasma detection | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| HIV detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| HBV detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| HCV detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| CMV detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| EBV detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| TP detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| HB19 detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| HHV-6 detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| Retrovirus detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| Bovine virus detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| Exogenous virus detection | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
| STR authentication | Single peak at detection sites | Single peak at detection sites | Single peak at detection sites | Single peak at detection sites | Single peak at detection sites | Single peak at detection sites |
| Karyotype analysis | N/A | 46 XX | N/A | 46 XY | N/A | 46 XY |
| Tumorigenicity test | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative | N/A | Negative |
Figure 4Structure of the UC−MSC sheet. (A) Morphology of the UC−MSC sheet. (B) Enlarged morphology of the UC−MSC sheet. (C) Fibronectin and Integrin β1 staining of the UC−MSC sheet.
Figure 5Characteristic tests of UC−MSC sheets. (A) Statistics of cell sheet diameters. (B) Statistical analysis of cell amount per sheet. (C) Statistics of cell viability. (D) Statistical analysis of cell apoptosis.
Figure 6Cell characteristic tests of UC−MSC sheets. (A) Cell surface marker expression of freshly and 24 h preserved cell sheets. (B) Representative results of induced adipogenic (white arrows point to lipid droplets stained with oil red), osteogenic (white arrows point to calcium nodules stained with alizarin red), and chondrogenic (white arrows point to cartilage stained with alcian blue) differentiation of freshly and 24 h preserved cell sheets.
Cell surface marker test of the UC−MSC sheets.
| Markers | Positive Cell Proportion | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | ||||
| 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | 0 h | 24 h | |
| CD73 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 99.8% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.9% |
| CD90 | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.8% |
| CD105 | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.9% | 99.5% | 99.6% | 99.9% |
| CD11b | 0.612% | 0.559% | 0.485% | 0.916% | 0.027% | 0.031% |
| CD19 | 0.413% | 0.259% | 0.273% | 0.516% | 0.074% | 0.031% |
| CD34 | 0.357% | 0.258% | 0.231% | 0.131% | 0.170% | 0.015% |
| CD45 | 0.402% | 0.327% | 0.172% | 0.538% | 0.009% | 0.016% |
| HLA-DR | 0.570% | 0.314% | 0.252% | 0.324% | 0.064% | 0.008% |
Figure 7Detection of residues of high-risk substances. (A) Bovine serum albumin (BSA). (B) Human serum albumin (HSA). (C) Gentamicin. (D) Fibrinogen. (E) TrypLE. (F) Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF).
Figure 8Growth factor detection of UC−MSC sheet. (A) Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (B) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (C) Interleukin-6 (IL-6) (D) Interleukin-8 (IL-8).
Figure 9Immunomodulatory effect test of the UC−MSC sheet. (A) Detection of lymphocyte proliferation inhibition ability of UC−MSC sheet. (B) Detection of lymphocyte tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) secretion inhibition ability of UC−MSC sheet. (C) Detection of Th1 lymphocyte inhibition ability of UC−MSC sheet.
Figure 10Proangiogenic function test of UC−MSC sheet. (A) ImageJ Angiogenesis Analyzer was used to quantify endothelial tube formation. Images were taken using an inverted microscope and analyzed using an angiogenesis analyzer. Yellow lines represent tubes that connect together to different junctions; green lines represent branches; dark blue represents isolated tubes; red circles represent the master junction points. (B) Statistical results of Nb junctions. (C) Statistical results of total length. *** represent p < 0.01.
Figure 11Anti-apoptotic function test of the cell sheet. (A) Apoptosis results of H9C2 cells cultured in cell sheet-forming conditioned medium or negative control medium after induction of apoptosis by cobalt chloride. (B) Statistical results of apoptosis results of H9C2 cells cultured in cell sheet-forming conditioned medium or negative control medium after apoptosis was induced by cobalt chloride. *** represent p < 0.01.
Safety test of the UC−MSC sheet.
| Items | Methods | Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | ||
| Sterility test | Membrane filtration method | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Mycoplasma test | Q-PCR method | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| Mycoplasma test | Culture method | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| STR authentication | Fluorescence STR method | Single peak at detection sites | Single peak at detection sites | Single peak at detection sites |
| Endotoxin test | Gel Clot LAL Assay | ≤6.6EU/CS | ≤6.6EU/CS | ≤6.6EU/CS |