| Literature DB >> 36077442 |
Delia Doris Muntean1, Maria Bădărînză2, Paul Andrei Ștefan3,4,5, Manuela Lavinia Lenghel1, Georgeta Mihaela Rusu1, Csaba Csutak1, Paul Alexandru Coroian5, Roxana Adelina Lupean6, Daniela Fodor2.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of MRI-based texture features of the lacrimal glands (LG) in augmenting the imaging differentiation between primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) affected LG and healthy LG, as well as to emphasize the possible importance of radiomics in pSS early-imaging diagnosis. The MRI examinations of 23 patients diagnosed with pSS and 23 healthy controls were retrospectively included. Texture features of both LG were extracted from a coronal post-contrast T1-weighted sequence, using a dedicated software. The ability of texture features to discriminate between healthy and pSS lacrimal glands was performed through univariate, multivariate, and receiver operating characteristics analysis. Two quantitative textural analysis features, RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized (RLNonUN) and Maximum2DDiameterColumn (Max2DDC), were independent predictors of pSS-affected glands (p < 0.001). Their combined ability was able to identify pSS LG with 91.67% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity. MRI-based texture features have the potential to function as quantitative additional criteria that could increase the diagnostic accuracy of pSS-affected LG.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; lacrimal glands; primary Sjögren’s Syndrome; radiomics; textural analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077442 PMCID: PMC9456288 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231710051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1(A) The lacrimal apparatus anatomy—illustration. (B) Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR image with fat saturation depicting the normal aspect of the lacrimal gland localized in the superolateral region of the orbit (extraconal) and its lobe divisions.
Descriptive data of the pSS patients.
| Variable (n = 23) | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 58.79 ± 12.64 |
| Female:male | 21:2 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.15 ± 4.78 |
| Disease duration (months) | 29 [15.5–60] |
| ESSDAI | |
| Inactive | 17 (73.9) |
| Moderately active | 4 (17.3) |
| Severely active | 2 (8.69) |
| ESSDAI score | 3.71 ± 5.94 |
| Positive Schirmer’s test | 20 (86.9) |
| Schirmer’s test (mm) | 1 [1.5, 3.75] |
| Xerophthalmia | |
| Absent | 1 (4.3) |
| Mild under treatment | 18 (78.3) |
| Severe under treatment | 4 (17.4) |
| Anti-Ro/La autoantibodies | 20 (86.9) |
| Rheumatoid factor | 18 (78.2) |
The results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median and [interquartile range], or percentage (%), n = number of patients, BMI = body mass index, ESSDAI = EULAR Sjögren’s Syndrome disease activity index.
Textural features that show statistically significant results at the univariate analysis between patients with pSS and healthy subjects.
| Parameter | pSS Group (n = 23) | Control Group (n = 23) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR | ||
| RunPercentage | 0.000025 | 0.89 | 0.85–0.90 | 0.85 | 0.82–0.86 |
| InverseVariance | 0.000027 | 0.30 | 0.27–0.35 | 0.36 | 0.34–0.4 |
| ZoneVariance | 0.000028 | 1.61 | 0.80–2.44 | 3.26 | 2.09–4.27 |
| LargeDependenceEmphasis | 0.000029 | 4.56 | 3.90–5.96 | 6.29 | 5.35–7.92 |
| RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized | 0.000031 | 0.80 | 0.75–0.84 | 0.75 | 0.70–0.77 |
| ShortRunEmphasis | 0.000032 | 0.91 | 0.89–0.93 | 0.88 | 0.86–0.90 |
| GrayLevelNonUniformity | 0.000033 | 8.39 | 7.04–10.01 | 11.63 | 8.88–15.70 |
| SmallDependenceEmphasis | 0.000035 | 0.56 | 0.47–0.60 | 0.45 | 0.41–0.49 |
| DependenceNonUniformityNormalized | 0.000047 | 0.34 | 0.27–0.37 | 0.27 | 0.24–0.30 |
| LongRunEmphasis | 0.000050 | 1.42 | 1.35–1.57 | 1.62 | 1.51–1.82 |
| DependenceVariance | 0.000141 | 1.05 | 0.79–1.47 | 1.49 | 1.28–1.85 |
| SizeZoneNonUniformityNormalized | 0.000149 | 0.53 | 0.48–0.60 | 0.47 | 0.40–0.50 |
| RunVariance | 0.000154 | 0.16 | 0.12–0.20 | 0.23 | 0.18–0.30 |
| SmallAreaEmphasis | 0.000189 | 0.75 | 0.72–0.80 | 0.71 | 0.65–0.74 |
| LargeAreaHighGrayLevelEmphasis | 0.000200 | 1304.26 | 922.01–2309.91 | 2835.71 | 1510.48–4198.58 |
| Kurtosis | 0.000335 | 3.29 | 2.85–3.84 | 4.97 | 3.22–6.73 |
| RobustMeanAbsoluteDeviation | 0.000480 | 71.89 | 54.54–86.86 | 55.64 | 42.45–67.38 |
| Maximum2DDiameterColumn | 0.000550 | 5.03 | 4.65–5.73 | 5.77 | 5.35–6.47 |
| Skewness | 0.000550 | -0.59 | −0.96–−0.11 | −1.10 | −1.46–−0.44 |
p = statistical significance level; IQR = interquartile range.
Multivariate analysis results. Bold values are statistically significant.
| Independent Variables | Coefficient | Std. Error | t |
| r partial | r semipartial | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DependenceNonUniformityNormalized | −8.77 | 6.47 | −1.35 | 0.179 | −0.15 | 0.11 | 141.98 |
| DependenceVariance | −0.60 | 1.00 | −0.60 | 0.548 | −0.06 | 0.04 | 220.03 |
| GrayLevelNonUniformity | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.48 | 0.626 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 3.10 |
| InverseVariance | −3.05 | 1.89 | −1.61 | 0.109 | −0.18 | 0.13 | 9.69 |
| Kurtosis | −0.02 | 0.05 | −0.39 | 0.696 | −0.04 | 0.03 | 6.54 |
| LargeAreaHighGrayLevelEmphasis | −0.00 | 5.06 | −1.03 | 0.304 | −0.11 | 0.08 | 5.82 |
| LargeDependenceEmphasis | −1.04 | 1.31 | −0.79 | 0.431 | −0.09 | 0.06 | 6242.02 |
| LongRunEmphasis | −5.83 | 4.41 | −1.32 | 0.189 | −0.15 | 0.10 | 1440.47 |
| Maximum2DDiameterColumn | −0.09 | 0.04 | −2.12 |
| −0.23 | 0.17 | 1.30 |
| RobustMeanAbsoluteDeviation | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 0.352 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 4.79 |
| RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized | 42.15 | 21.14 | 1.99 |
| 0.22 | 0.16 | 1386.23 |
| RunPercentage | −87.08 | 75.41 | −1.15 | 0.251 | −0.13 | 0.09 | 8747.97 |
| RunVariance | 9.60 | 7.76 | 1.23 | 0.219 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 710.30 |
| ShortRunEmphasis | −82.77 | 43.88 | −1.88 | 0.063 | −0.21 | 0.15 | 1750.14 |
| SizeZoneNonUniformityNormalized | −8.85 | 8.91 | −0.99 | 0.323 | −0.11 | 0.08 | 473.78 |
| Skewness | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.70 | 0.480 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 4.32 |
| SmallAreaEmphasis | 4.35 | 11.61 | 0.37 | 0.709 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 511.95 |
| SmallDependenceEmphasis | 21.37 | 14.73 | 1.45 | 0.151 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 1570.01 |
| ZoneVariance | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.76 | 0.449 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 75.30 |
Std. Error = standard error; p = statistical significance level; VIF = Variance Inflation Factor.
The diagnostic performance of the selected radiomic features and of the combined prediction model in differentiating between normal LG and LG of patients with pSS.
| Texture Parameter | AUC | J | Cut-Off | Se | Sp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum2DDiameterColumn | 0.713 | 0.0001 | 0.41 | ≤5.35 | 70.83 | 70.83 |
| RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized | 0.747 | <0.0001 | 0.52 | >0.77 | 72.92 | 79.17 |
| Prediction model | 0.905 | <0.0001 | 0.75 | >0.44 | 91.67 | 83.33 |
AUC = area under the curve; J = Youden index; Se = sensitivity; Sp = specificity. Between the brackets are values corresponding to the 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2Area under the receiver-operating curve analysis of the two predictive radiomic features (Max2DDC and RLNonUN) and the prediction model for pSS parenchymal changes in LG.
Correlation between the two predictive radiomic features for pSS parenchymal changes in LG and the ESSDAI score and Schirmer test values.
| Radiomic Feature | ESSDAI Score | Schirmer’s Test (mm) |
|---|---|---|
| Max2DDC | r = 0.315, | r = −0.312, |
| RLNonUN | r = −0.191, | r = 0.334, |
r = correlation coefficient; p = statistical significance level.
Figure 3Example of lacrimal gland segmentation in a patient diagnosed with primary Sjögren’s Syndrome. Coronal contrast-enhanced T1-weighed image with fat saturation, before segmentation (A) and after segmentation (B); 3D reconstruction of the lacrimal glands (C); magnified 3D reconstruction of the lacrimal glands (D).