Literature DB >> 36076123

Changes in sensory block level during a programmed intermittent epidural bolus regimen for labour analgesia: a prospective observational cohort study.

Julia F Casellato1,2, Xiang Y Ye3, Kristi Downey4, Jose C A Carvalho4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the context of a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) regimen for labour analgesia, one can identify an upper sensory block level (USBL), defined as the highest dermatome with any altered sensation to cold, and a lower sensory block level (LSBL), defined as the highest dermatome with complete sensory block to cold. This study investigated whether and how these sensory block levels vary within PIEB cycles.
METHODS: We enrolled patients requesting epidural analgesia. An epidural catheter was placed at L2/L3 or L3/L4. A test dose of 3 mL of bupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 3.3 µg·mL-1 was administered, followed by 12 mL of the same solution as the loading dose. A PIEB plus patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) regimen was initiated 40 min after the loading dose, with bupivacaine 0.0625% with fentanyl 2 µg·mL-1: PIEB 10 mL, PIEB interval 40 min, PCEA 5 mL, lockout interval 10 min, maximum hourly 30 mL. As per institutional protocol, sensory block levels to ice were assessed 20 min after the loading dose and then hourly. Patients included in the study underwent eight extra assessments: immediately before the second and fourth PIEB and 10, 20, and 30 min after the second and third PIEB.
RESULTS: We studied 30 patients. The USBL and LSBL achieved their peak value 100 min after the loading dose. The median [interquartile range] USBL was T8 [T9-T7] and T6 [T7-T4] 20 and 100 min after the loading dose, respectively; LSBL was T10 [T11-T6] and T8 [T9-T6], respectively. There was no significant variation in USBL or LSBL within the PIEB cycle between the second and the third or the third and the fourth PIEB.
CONCLUSION: Once peak sensory block levels are established, there is no significant variation in the USBL and LSBL within the PIEB cycles. STUDY REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04716660); registered 21 January 2021.
© 2022. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidural analgesia; labour analgesia; obstetric analgesia; programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB); sensory block-level testing

Year:  2022        PMID: 36076123     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02318-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   6.713


  9 in total

1.  Epidural distribution of dye administered via an epidural catheter in a porcine model.

Authors:  I Mowat; R Tang; H Vaghadia; C Krebs; W R Henderson; A Sawka
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M van der Vyver; S Halpern; G Joseph
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section.

Authors:  Quinn Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  A comparison of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia.

Authors:  P R Bromage
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1965

Review 5.  Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years.

Authors:  C Loubert; A Hinova; R Fernando
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Assessment of sensory block during labour epidural analgesia: a prospective cohort study to determine the influence of the direction of testing.

Authors:  Eliane Cristina de Souza Soares; Mrinalini Balki; Kristi Downey; Xiang Y Ye; Jose Carlos A Carvalho
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.713

Review 7.  Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ronald B George; Terrence K Allen; Ashraf S Habib
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 8.  Maintaining labour epidural analgesia: what is the best option?

Authors:  Serene Leo; Alex Tiong-Heng Sia
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 9.  Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour.

Authors:  Ban Leong Sng; Yanzhi Zeng; Nurun Nisa A de Souza; Wan Ling Leong; Ting Ting Oh; Fahad Javaid Siddiqui; Pryseley N Assam; Nian-Lin R Han; Edwin Sy Chan; Alex T Sia
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.