Literature DB >> 36074306

Immediate dental implant placement in post-extraction-infected sites decontaminated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser: a retrospective cohort study.

Rolando Crippa1, Riccardo Aiuto2,3, Mario Dioguardi4, Michele Nieri5, María Peñarrocha-Diago6, Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago6, Francesca Angiero1.   

Abstract

Dental implants placed in fresh extraction alveoli provide several advantages, including shorter treatment periods and improved patient comfort. After a compromised tooth extraction, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser can considerably reduce bacterial concentration. The objective of this controlled study conducted after at least 1 year of follow-up was to compare the use of immediate post-extraction implants in infected sites treated with laser (test group) versus conventional implants in edentulous sites (control group) through an analysis of pre- and post-operative radiographs. The study was based on a series of patients treated between 2014 and 2019, with a 1-year minimum follow-up, and up to over 4 years. An analysis of the clinical history of the treated patients and pre- and post-operative radiographs was performed to evaluate the implant success and to measure the marginal bone level (MBL). Overall, 149 implants were studied. There was only one failure in the test group (1%) and no failures in the control group. The test group gained 0.1 mm of the MBL compared to the baseline, while the control group lost 0.1 mm of the MBL. The difference between the two groups of only 0.2 mm was not statistically significant (P = 0.058). Immediate dental implants in infected sockets debrided and decontaminated using Er,Cr:YSGG laser do not appear to enhance the likelihood of failure; however, peri-implantitis and associated problems must be avoided by following a certain set of protocols and procedures.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental implant; Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment; Oral surgery; Socket preservation; Tooth extraction

Year:  2022        PMID: 36074306     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-022-00734-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.885


  6 in total

1.  Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs: a histomorphometric study of bone-implant contact.

Authors:  Arthur B Novaes; Andréa M Marcaccini; Sérgio L S Souza; Mário Taba; Márcio F M Grisi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets.

Authors:  Christoph H F Hämmerle; Stephen T Chen; Thomas G Wilson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  [The Tübinger immediate implant].

Authors:  W Schulte; G Heimke
Journal:  Quintessenz       Date:  1976-06

4.  Antibiotic treatment to prevent postextraction complications: a monocentric, randomized clinical trial. Preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  Antonio Barone; Francesco S Marchionni; Chiara Cinquini; Andrea Cipolli Panattoni; Paolo Toti; Simone Marconcini; Ugo Covani; Mario Gabriele
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2017-05-31

Review 5.  Peri-implant diseases. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  E Romeo; M Ghisolfi; D Carmagnola
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2004-05

6.  Immediate placement of implants into periodontally infected sites in dogs. Part 2: A fluorescence microscopy study.

Authors:  Andréa M Marcaccini; Arthur B Novaes; Sérgio L S Souza; Mário Taba; Márcio F M Grisi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.