Literature DB >> 36073718

Adding rapid diagnostic tests to community-based programmes for treating malaria.

Elizabeth N Allen1, Alison Beriliy Wiyeh2, Michael McCaul3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends parasitological testing of all suspected malaria cases using malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs) or microscopy prior to treatment. Some governments have extended this responsibility to community health workers (CHWs) to reduce malaria morbidity and mortality through prompt and appropriate treatment. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2013.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate community-based management strategies for treating malaria or fever that incorporate both a definitive diagnosis with an mRDT and appropriate antimalarial treatment. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases, and three trials registers up to 14 September 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included individually randomized trials and cluster-randomized controlled trials (cRCTs), controlled before-after studies, and controlled interrupted time series studies in people living in malaria-endemic areas, comparing programmes that train CHWs and drug shop vendors to perform mRDTs and provide appropriate treatment versus similar programmes that do not use mRDTs, and versus routine health facility care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. For each dichotomous outcome, we extracted the number of participants with the event and the total number of participants in each group, unless studies presented results at a population level only. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and number of people receiving an antimalarial within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were malaria-specific mortality, severe malaria, outcomes related to antimalarial treatments, antibiotic prescribing to people with a negative microscopy or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) result, parasitaemia, anaemia, and all adverse events. MAIN
RESULTS: We included eight studies from several African countries, Afghanistan, and Myanmar. Staff included CHWs and drug shop vendors.  Community use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests compared to clinical diagnosis Compared to clinical diagnosis, mRDT diagnosis results in reduced prescribing of antimalarials to people who are found to be malaria parasite-negative by microscopy or PCR testing (71 fewer per 100 people, 95% confidence interval (CI) 79 to 51 fewer; risk ratio (RR) 0.17, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.40; 3 cRCTs, 7877 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This reduction may be greater among CHWs compared to drug shop vendors. People diagnosed by mRDT are more likely to receive appropriate treatment; that is, an antimalarial if they are microscopy- or PCR-positive and no antimalarial if they are microscopy- or PCR-negative (RR 3.04, 95% CI 2.46 to 3.74, 3 cRCTs, 9332 participants; high-certainty evidence). Three studies found that a small percentage of people with a negative mRDT result (as read by the CHW or drug shop vendors at the time of treatment) were nevertheless given an antimalarial: 38/1368 (2.8%), 44/724 (6.1%) and 124/950 (13.1%). Conversely, in two studies, a few mRDT-positive people did not receive an antimalarial (0.5% and 0.3%), and one small cross-over study found that 6/57 (10.5%) people classified as non-malaria in the clinical diagnosis arm received an antimalarial. Use of mRDTs probably increases antibiotic use compared to clinical diagnosis (13 more per 100 people, 95% CI 3 to 29 more; RR 2.02, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.37; 2 cRCTs, 5179 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We were unable to demonstrate any effect on mortality. Community use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests compared to health facility care Results were insufficient to reach any conclusion. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Use of mRDTs by CHWs and drug shop vendors compared to clinical diagnosis reduces prescribing of antimalarials to people without malaria. Deaths were uncommon in both groups. Antibiotic prescribing was higher in those with a negative mRDT than in those with a negative clinical diagnosis.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36073718      PMCID: PMC9453882          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009527.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  61 in total

Review 1.  Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnant women in endemic areas: any drug regimen versus placebo or no treatment.

Authors:  Denitsa Radeva-Petrova; Kassoum Kayentao; Feiko O ter Kuile; David Sinclair; Paul Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-10

2.  The impact of retail-sector delivery of artemether-lumefantrine on malaria treatment of children under five in Kenya: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beth P Kangwana; Sarah V Kedenge; Abdisalan M Noor; Victor A Alegana; Andrew J Nyandigisi; Jayesh Pandit; Greg W Fegan; James E Todd; Simon Brooker; Robert W Snow; Catherine A Goodman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Insecticide-treated nets for preventing malaria.

Authors:  Joseph Pryce; Marty Richardson; Christian Lengeler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-06

4.  Systematic literature review of integrated community case management and the private sector in Africa: Relevant experiences and potential next steps.

Authors:  Phyllis Awor; Jane Miller; Stefan Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.413

5.  Introducing rapid tests for malaria into the retail sector: what are the unintended consequences?

Authors:  Eleanor Hutchinson; Coll Hutchison; Sham Lal; Kristian Hansen; Miriam Kayendeke; Christine Nabirye; Pascal Magnussen; Siân E Clarke; Anthony Mbonye; Clare I R Chandler
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2017-01-11

Review 6.  Introducing malaria rapid diagnostic tests in private medicine retail outlets: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Theodoor Visser; Katia Bruxvoort; Kathleen Maloney; Toby Leslie; Lawrence M Barat; Richard Allan; Evelyn K Ansah; Jennifer Anyanti; Ian Boulton; Siân E Clarke; Jessica L Cohen; Justin M Cohen; Andrea Cutherell; Caitlin Dolkart; Katie Eves; Günther Fink; Catherine Goodman; Eleanor Hutchinson; Sham Lal; Anthony Mbonye; Obinna Onwujekwe; Nora Petty; Julie Pontarollo; Stephen Poyer; David Schellenberg; Elizabeth Streat; Abigail Ward; Virginia Wiseman; Christopher J M Whitty; Shunmay Yeung; Jane Cunningham; Clare I R Chandler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expanding access to parasite-based malaria diagnosis through retail drug shops in Tanzania: evidence from a randomized trial and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Kathleen Maloney; Abigail Ward; Bonnie Krenz; Nora Petty; Lindsay Bryson; Caitlin Dolkart; Theodoor Visser; Arnaud Le Menach; Valerie K Scott; Justin M Cohen; Esther Mtumbuka; Sigsbert Mkude
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  Effects of malaria volunteer training on coverage and timeliness of diagnosis: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Myanmar.

Authors:  Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 9.  Impact of home-based management of malaria on health outcomes in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Heidi Hopkins; Ambrose Talisuna; Christopher Jm Whitty; Sarah G Staedke
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 2.979

10.  Proactive community case management in Senegal 2014-2016: a case study in maximizing the impact of community case management of malaria.

Authors:  Seynabou Gaye; Janelle Kibler; Jean Louis Ndiaye; Mame Birame Diouf; Annē Linn; Alioune Badara Gueye; Fatou Ba Fall; Médoune Ndiop; Ibrahima Diallo; Moustapha Cisse; Mady Ba; Julie Thwing
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.