OBJECTIVE: In the early stages of cartilage damage, diagnostic methods focusing on the mechanism of maintaining the hydrostatic pressure of cartilage are thought to be useful. 17O-labeled water, which is a stable isotope of oxygen, has the advantage of no radiation exposure or allergic reactions and can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to evaluate MRI images using 17O-labeled water in a rabbit model. DESIGN: Contrast MRI with 17O-labeled water and macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed 4 and 8 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament transection surgery in rabbits. A total of 18 T2-weighted images were acquired, and 17O-labeled water was manually administered on the third scan. The 17O concentration in each phase was calculated from the signal intensity at the articular cartilage. Macroscopic and histological grades were evaluated and compared with the 17O concentration. RESULTS: An increase in 17O concentration in the macroscopic and histologically injured areas was observed by MRI. Macroscopic evaluation showed that the 17O concentration significantly increased in the damaged site group. Histological evaluations also showed that 17O concentrations significantly increased at 36 minutes 30 seconds after initiating MRI scanning in the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grade 3 (0.493 in grade 0, 0.659 in grade 1, 0.4651 in grade 2, and 0.9964 in grade 3, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: 17O-labeled water could visualize earlier articular cartilage damage, which is difficult to detect by conventional methods.
OBJECTIVE: In the early stages of cartilage damage, diagnostic methods focusing on the mechanism of maintaining the hydrostatic pressure of cartilage are thought to be useful. 17O-labeled water, which is a stable isotope of oxygen, has the advantage of no radiation exposure or allergic reactions and can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aimed to evaluate MRI images using 17O-labeled water in a rabbit model. DESIGN: Contrast MRI with 17O-labeled water and macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed 4 and 8 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament transection surgery in rabbits. A total of 18 T2-weighted images were acquired, and 17O-labeled water was manually administered on the third scan. The 17O concentration in each phase was calculated from the signal intensity at the articular cartilage. Macroscopic and histological grades were evaluated and compared with the 17O concentration. RESULTS: An increase in 17O concentration in the macroscopic and histologically injured areas was observed by MRI. Macroscopic evaluation showed that the 17O concentration significantly increased in the damaged site group. Histological evaluations also showed that 17O concentrations significantly increased at 36 minutes 30 seconds after initiating MRI scanning in the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) grade 3 (0.493 in grade 0, 0.659 in grade 1, 0.4651 in grade 2, and 0.9964 in grade 3, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: 17O-labeled water could visualize earlier articular cartilage damage, which is difficult to detect by conventional methods.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common causes of locomotor disorders
characterized by cartilage degradation, bone remodeling, osteophyte formation, joint
inflammation, and loss of normal joint function, which commonly affects
weight-bearing joints, such as the knees, hips, spine, hands, and feet.[1-3] At present, OA diagnosis relies
on conventional imaging methodologies, such as radiography, magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) or ultrasound, and invasive arthroscopy. Early stage of OA has very
few signals in radiography; thus, arthroscopy and MRI provide an assessment complementary.
Epidemiologically, OA affects a large number of patients; prevalence of
radiographically confirmed knee OA in Japan has been reported to be 42.0% in males
and 61.5% in females aged above 40 years.
However, there is still no appropriate modality for OA diagnosis, especially
for early-stage OA.Recently, there has been growing interest in developing MR techniques for the
accurate diagnosing and staging of OA. For the purpose of evaluating structural
alterations in articular cartilage, qualitative evaluation of cartilage has been
performed by measuring the relaxation time of T1, T2, and T1ρ.[6-8] Furthermore, with the recent
advances in MRI technology, new MRI evaluation methods that can detect changes in
the molecular structure of articular cartilage with high sensitivity are being
clinically applied.[9,10] However, the MRI evaluation has been inferior to arthroscopic
findings in diagnosing cartilage damages.
While it may be possible to assess the structural properties of articular
cartilage by quantifying the susceptibility of collagen fibers in articular
cartilage by T1ρMRI,
it is theoretically impossible to evaluate the metabolic dynamics of
cartilage substrates. To assess articular cartilage metabolism, there are evaluation
methods such as delayed contrast-enhanced cartilage MRI (dGEMRIC), which examines
the amount of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in the cartilage.
Although it is considered more sensitive than other MRI imaging methods for
detecting cartilage damage, contrast-enhanced MRI involves the risk of allergic
reactions.Maintaining hydrostatic pressure in cartilage tissue affects not only mechanical
properties, but also chondrocyte mechanotransduction and cell survival through
apoptosis. In the early stages of cartilage damage, disruption of the hydrostatic
pressure maintenance mechanism of cartilage tissue is thought to alter the
mechanical properties of the cartilage matrix.[13,14] An early feature of OA is the
loss of GAG from cartilage tissues, and disruption of cartilage hydrostatic pressure
maintenance mechanisms is thought to induce chondrocyte apoptosis. Hydrostatic
pressure also acts as a modulator of chondrocyte morphology and metabolism.
Therefore, it is important to evaluate the ability of cartilage matrix to
maintain hydrostatic pressure. On the contrary, hydrostatic pressure in cartilage
tissue is maintained by the binding of water to proteoglycans within the cartilage
matrix. Hence, it may be possible to estimate the hydrostatic pressure of the
cartilage matrix by tracking the water molecules in the cartilage matrix. Authors
slowly administered a 20% 17O-labeled water inside the joint. How much
contrast was finally injected? Please, define why a single administration was not
established. However, no modality has been developed that allows direct observation
of water-binding capacity or tracking of water itself.The 17O isotope, which is the only stable isotope of oxygen, has the
advantage of being free from radiation exposure and allergic reactions. It can
produce an MRI signal,
and dynamic steady-state sequences for indirect 17O imaging and
absolute quantification of 17O concentration using MRI have been reported.
Because it can be distinguished from the host joint fluid, MRI can directly
observe the dynamics of exogenous hydrogen oxide that penetrates the cartilage
matrix. Therefore, it might be possible to visualize alterations in the hydrostatic
pressure of the cartilage by observing the metabolic dynamics of water molecules in
cartilage using 17O-labeled water by MRI.We hypothesized that spatiotemporal alterations of cartilage detected by MRI with the
17O-labeled water would enable the visualization of the early stage
of articular cartilage damage and the alteration in the hydrostatic pressure of
cartilage. This study aimed to develop a novel modality of MRI using an
intra-articular injection of 17O-labeled water and to evaluate its
accuracy and diagnostic ability using a rabbit model.
Methods
Optimization of 17O-Labeled Water Administration
Administration of 17O-labeled water was performed using 14-week-old
Japanese white rabbits. A 24G indwelling needle was inserted through the
patellar tendon from the front of the knee joint, and the tip of the catheter
was placed in the joint. Then, 10 mL of saline solution was administered to
confirm that the joint could be injected reliably, and the joint was expanded to
facilitate evaluation. A circuit that can administer the drug solution into the
joint during MRI was created by connecting the indwelling needle and extension
tube. During continuous MRI, 0.5 mL of 20% concentration of
17O-labeled water (Taiyo Nippon Sanso, Tokyo) was slowly administered
into the joint in the examination room because large injection into the joints
of small animals may shift the position of joint. The 17O
concentration at the end of the experiment was approximately 1% under the
influence of a pre-administered saline solution. Before performing arthrography,
the effects of arthrography on living animals and amputated limbs were examined
as a preliminary study. As there was no difference between the images obtained
from the living animal and the amputated limb, we determined to perform
arthrography by transecting the limb at the thigh to minimize the effect of body
movement.
Rabbit OA Model
Japanese white rabbits (14 weeks old) were used for anterior cruciate ligament
(ACL) transection surgery to induce OA. Rabbits were anesthetized with
intravenous sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg) and ketamine (50 mg/kg). Anesthesia
was maintained under oxygen isoflurane inhalation anesthesia. The right hind
limb was shaved and cleansed with povidone-iodine. After local anesthesia with
xylocaine (0.02 mg/kg), the skin at the medial side of the kneecap was incised
about 5 cm to expose the patella and patellar tendon. After the medial joint
capsule was incised, the ACL was exposed by dislocating the patella laterally
with the knee flexed. The ACL was cut with a surgical scalpel, and complete
resection of the ACL was confirmed by displacing the tibia anteriorly from the
femur. The patella was moved back to the midline, and the fascia and skin were
sutured sequentially using 3-0 polydioxanone and 3-0 nylon threads. After
irrigation of the operative field with saline, the patellar dislocation was
reduced, and the fascia and skin were sutured sequentially using 3-0 nylon
threads. Postoperatively, euthanasia was performed if wound infection was
observed or if the patient was unable to stand. Degeneration of the cartilage
surface begins 4 weeks after cartilage damage and occurs in the entire cartilage
layer after 8 weeks.
Half of the rabbits were euthanized with pentobarbital (200 mg/kg) 4
weeks postsurgery and the other half were euthanized 8 weeks postsurgery, and
MRI and macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed.
Examination of MRI Conditions
MRI was conducted using a 3.0 Tesla scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma; Siemens, Tokyo)
with a 4-channel small flex coil. To evaluate the most loaded part of the femur,
5-slice scan was performed centering on the most loaded part of the femur, with
a coronal section tilted 45° to the bone axis. First, an MRI image of a proton
density–enhanced image was taken as a reference image to identify the articular
cartilage (TE, 21 ms; TR, 1600; FOV, 60 mm × 80 mm; matrix, 269 × 448; slice
thickness, 2 mm; slice gap, 2.6 mm; number of excitations, 6; scan time, 3
minutes 39 seconds). Second, T2-weighted images using the 2D-fast spin echo
method were performed continuously (TE, 129 ms; TR, 1600; echo train length, 12;
FOV, 60 mm × 80 mm; matrix, 269 × 448; slice thickness: 2 mm; slice gap, 2.6 mm;
number of excitations: 6; scan time: 3 minutes 39 seconds; number of
repetitions: 18; total scan time: 65 minutes 42 seconds). The scan duration was
3 minutes 39 seconds, and the sequence was repeated 18 times (total scan time,
65 minutes 42 seconds). The voxel sizes of the 2 sequences were both 0.22 mm ×
0.2 mm. The catheter was placed in the rabbit knee joint as in the optimization
conditions, and 3 scans after the start of this dynamic scanning, 0.5 mL of
17O-labeled water (enriched to 20%; Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corp,
Tokyo) was manually administered via the catheter. The injection rate was
approximately 0.5 Â mL/s, and a 0.5 mL saline flush was performed.
MRI and Evaluation
The articular cartilage in each slice section was identified from the proton
density–enhanced images, and multiple small regions of interest (ROIs) were set
at 6 locations in the center, medial, and lateral sides of each condyles of
articular cartilage of femur. Then, the 17O concentration in each
phase of each ROI was calculated using the signal intensity of the T2-enhanced
image via the following equation: 17O concentration (%) =
−1/(TE×R217O) × log(S/S0) + 0.038; TE, echo time;
R217O, 3.33; S, the signal intensity of ROI; S0, mean signal
intensity of ROI before administration; 0.038; natural abundance of
17O.
The time course of 17O concentration in each ROI was
evaluated, and a 17O concentration maps was created to visualize the
17O concentration change on the joint surface. The time course of
17O concentration in each ROI was also compared with the
macroscopic and histological grades of cartilage damage described in the
following sections.
Macroscopic Evaluation
After MRI, the rabbit knee joint was expanded, and cartilage damage in the
femoral condyle was macroscopically and histologically evaluated according to
the MRI slice. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) scoring was
used for macroscopic evaluation by an independent blinded observer, and score 2
or more with OARSI scoring, which stores Indian ink, was designated as
macroscopic cartilage lesion.
Histological Evaluation
Operated limbs were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 24 to 48 hours and
decalcified in 24% formic acid and 5% formalin for 20 days. Tissue sections were
prepared for 3 slices centered on the most distal part of the femoral condyle,
sliced with a coronal section tilted 45° forward with respect to the bone axis
to match the MRI slice. Safranin-O staining was performed, and the OARSI grade
was used for histological evaluation by an independent blinded observer.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (MDF Co., Ltd.,
Tokyo). Using the average of the signal intensity obtained from the first 3 MRI
imaging as the baseline, the time course of 17O concentration in each
group was evaluated using a 1-way analysis of variance. Statistical significance
was set at P value <0.05.
Data Collection
The setting of the ROI was performed by 1 orthopedist, and the 17O
concentration was calculated by 1 radiologist.
Research Approval
All experiments were performed according to a protocol approved by the
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Graduate School of Medicine,
Hokkaido University (EC approval number: 19-0140).
Results
The result of optimization is shown first. Regarding the normal knee, the ROI was set
at the joint cavities shown as ROI 1 and 2 in
. The vertical axis of the graph shows the signal intensity of MRI, and the
horizontal axis shows the MRI phases. Administration of 17O decreased the
signal intensity in the knee joint cavity, whereas administration of 16O
did not change (
). Increased 17O concentrations in the joint cavity were indicated
by a 17O concentration maps of the relative 17O signals
compared with baseline, whereas no significant increase in 17O
concentrations in normal cartilage was detected within the approximate 65 minutes of
the present study (
).(A) Sample of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of
rabbit right knee joint. Region of interests (ROIs) are set at the joint
cavities shown as ROI 1 and 2 in the figure. (B) Changes of
signal intensity for each MRI phase. Administration of17O
decreased the signal intensity in the knee joint cavity, while
administration of 16O did not change. (C) Maps of
relative signal of 17O compared to baseline (phases 1-3) are
shown. Increased 17O concentration was shown in the knee joint
cavity.Macroscopic evaluation revealed 24 cartilage lesions in 10 knees. In the histological
evaluation, OARSI grade 1 was 23 points, grade 2 was 3 points, and grade 3 was 6
points. ROIs were set at 27 healthy areas as controls, and the 17O
concentration at each site was calculated from the MRI signal intensity.Maps of the relative signal of 17O compared with the baseline are shown.
The signal change in the dynamic scans could be visually confirmed on the
17O concentration maps of the MRI. By administering 17O
local injection to the knee joint cavity at 10 minutes 57 seconds after MRI scanning
was started, increased 17O concentration was observed in the knee joint
cavity at 14 minutes 36 seconds. An increased 17O concentration was shown
with the site that matched the macrographic cartilage lesion (
).Maps of the relative signal 17O compared to baseline are shown. By
administering 17O local injection to a knee joint cavity between
phases 3 and 4, increased 17O concentration was shown in the knee
joint cavity after phase 4. Increased 17O concentration was shown
with the site that matches macrographic cartilage lesion (arrowhead).Macrographic appearance, Safranin-O fast green staining, and 17O
concentration maps of MRI of representative cases at 4 weeks (
) and 8 weeks (
) postoperatively are shown. The dashed line shows the slice plane of the
tissue and the MRI. Macroscopic examination revealed cartilage lesions on the medial
femoral condyle with an OARSI score of 1 (arrow) at 4 weeks postoperatively and a
score of 2 (arrow) at 8 weeks postoperatively were observed. Histological evaluation
showed decreased cartilage stainability to the medial femoral condyle with OARSI
grade 1 (double arrow) at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Increased 17O
concentration is shown with the site that matches the macrographic cartilage lesion
(arrowhead).Macrographic appearance, Safranin-O fast green staining, and color-maps of
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 4 weeks (A) and 8 weeks
(B) postoperatively. The dashed line shows the slice plane
of tissue and MRI. Macroscopic cartilage lesion to medial femoral condyle
with OARSI score 1 (arrow) in 4 weeks postoperatively and score 2 (arrow) in
8 weeks postoperatively. Decreased cartilage stainability to medial femoral
condyle with OARSI grade 1 (double arrow) in 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively.
Increased 17O concentration was shown with the site that matches
macrographic cartilage lesion (arrowhead).The concentration-time curve between the macroscopic cartilage lesion and control
site grouped by OARSI scoring is shown in
. Increases in 17O concentration of cartilage lesions were
apparent at 43 minutes 48 seconds after MRI scanning was started (9 phases after the
injection of 17O-labeled water) compared with the control area. The
concentration-time curve grouped by OARSI grading also showed that increases in
density were apparent in the OARSI grade 3 group at 36 minutes 30 seconds after MRI
scanning was started (7 phases after the injection of 17O-labeled water) (
).
Figure 4.
(A) Concentration-time curve grouped by the presence (Damaged;
OARSI score ≧2) or absence (Intact; OARSI score 1) of macrographic cartilage
lesion. Increases in concentration are apparent at phases 12 to 17 (nine
phases after the injection of 17O-labeled water)
(*P < 0.05). (B) Concentration-time
curve grouped by OARSI grading (Grade 0 to 3). Increases in density are
apparent in the group of OARSI grading 3 after phase 10 (
**P < 0.05).
(A) Concentration-time curve grouped by the presence (Damaged;
OARSI score ≧2) or absence (Intact; OARSI score 1) of macrographic cartilage
lesion. Increases in concentration are apparent at phases 12 to 17 (nine
phases after the injection of 17O-labeled water)
(*P < 0.05). (B) Concentration-time
curve grouped by OARSI grading (Grade 0 to 3). Increases in density are
apparent in the group of OARSI grading 3 after phase 10 (
**P < 0.05).
Discussion
In this study, we established a 17O-labeled water administration procedure
and MRI examination method for rabbit knees to clarify the intra-articular dynamics
of water molecules in healthy and injured cartilage tissue for the first time. After
intra-articular administration of 17O-labeled water, it rapidly diffused
into the joint space, but there was no increase in 17O-labeled water
concentration in normal cartilage. In contrast, in the OA model rabbit, the
concentration of O
-labeled water increased significantly at the cartilage damage site after
intra-articular administration. Our results revealed that the rapid influx of joint
fluid containing 17O-labeled water occurred probably due to the failure
of hydrostatic pressure maintenance after cartilage tissue damage.Although advances in modality have increased the sensitivity and specificity of MRI
diagnosis of cartilage damage, sensitivity to early cartilage damage is still
developing.[22,23] T2-weighted imaging can be used to assess the structure of the
collagen fibril network. However, T2 changes in collagen fibril arrangement are
affected by the magic angle effect, which may be misunderstood as degenerating
normal articular cartilage.
T1ρMRI is specific for quantitative measurement of changes in proteoglycan
content; however, the T1ρ-weighted spin-lock pulse sequence is not currently
prevalent in clinical scanners.
Recently, MRI and computed tomography (CT) using contrast media have been
used to detect early cartilage injury[24,25]; however, there are concerns
about allergic reactions to contrast media and the risk of radiation exposure. Our
results showed that 17O-labeled water could safely assess early
histological cartilage injury without allergic reactions or radiation exposure.In comparison with the macroscopic assessment, a significant increase in
17O concentration was observed, consistent with the visible cartilage
injury site. Our results suggest that MRI detected macroscopic cartilage damage as
17O-labeled water flowed into the substrate from the physically
damaged cartilage site. In addition, significant differences were observed 30 to 60
minutes after administration of 17O-labeled water, which is a clinically
manageable timing in actual MRI. Because MRI with 17O-labeled water can
detect physical damage to the cartilage surface and quantitatively evaluate the
signal intensity of the ROI, it will be useful as a noninvasive and objective
modality compared with semi-quantitative macroscopic evaluation.Regarding the comparison with histological evaluation, MRI with
17O-labeled water presented a significant increase in signal intensity
for grade 3 cartilage damage with an OARSI score compared with normal cartilage.
This result suggested that the hydrostatic pressure maintenance mechanism of the
cartilage matrix may be disrupted by damage to more than histological grade 3.
Setton et al.
reported that damage of only 200 µm on the cartilage surface disrupted the
swelling pressure mechanism. The current results of 17O-labeled water
flowing into the cartilage matrix due to slight damage to the cartilage surface are
consistent with this previous report. In addition, our results suggested that the
hydrostatic pressure of cartilage substrate was maintained at histological grade 0
to 2, suggesting that mild histological damage, no more than histological grade 2,
may have little pathological significance in OA progression. The difference between
grade 1 and 2 is distinguished by a crack in the intermediate layer. For early OA,
irreversible changes are considered to occur after a certain damage. Our results
indicate that the hydrostatic pressure of cartilage is maintained up to the crack in
the middle layer (grade 2) and may be related to the reversibility of cartilage
degeneration. Wang et al.
reported that there was no change in the peak swelling strains in the
trypsin-loaded chemical cartilage degeneration model. Our results are consistent
with their report that a decrease in GAGs in the cartilage matrix is less important
than superficial damage in maintaining hydrostatic pressure in the cartilage matrix.
In this study, 17O-labeled water was used to directly evaluate the
metabolic dynamics of water, which is fundamentally different from the conventional
modality of looking at matrices such as charge and GAG. The results obtained using
17O-labeled water suggest that this modality not only helps in the
early diagnosis of OA, but also provides valuable information for considering the
mechanisms of OA pathogenesis.The current study had several limitations. The first limitation is that the
evaluation is based on amputated limbs and may differ from the metabolic dynamics of
the living body. However, this effect should be minimal because MRI was performed
within an hour of sacrificing the animal and alterations of physiological condition,
charge in cartilage matrix, and chondrocyte viability were minimized in such a short
time. Although we believe that in vivo evaluation is possible
because living humans will be able to maintain limb position during MRI scans,
experiments on living animals are required before experimenting on humans. The
second limitation was that evaluations in this study were made for early-stage OA,
but no evaluation was made for advanced OA. Severe cartilage damage may result in
different signal intensity changes or can be undetectable because of the loss of
cartilage substrates. As advanced OA can be detected by conventional examinations
such as radiographic images, it is unnecessary to perform MRI with
17O-labeled water. The third limitation is that the MRI angle is tilted
at 45° with respect to the bone axis, which is unusual compared with normal
conditions for humans. However, considering the most loaded part of the knees in
rabbits, we thought that this condition could clearly detect alterations in the
cartilage matrix in this OA model. When evaluating the human knee joint,
conventional coronal or sagittal image evaluations may be suitable.Despite these limitations, this is the first study to dynamically visualize the
alterations in the hydrostatic pressure of cartilage tissue in OA by administering
17O-labeled water intra-articularly and indicates the possibility of
a novel modality to detect early OA.In conclusion, we established a method using 17O-labeled water as a new
contrast medium and proved its usefulness. 17O-labeled water can
visualize earlier articular cartilage damage, which is difficult to detect using
conventional methods. This is the first modality to evaluate the metabolic dynamics
of water on cartilage without allergic reactions or radiation exposure.
Authors: Andrew J Wheaton; Francis L Casey; Alexander J Gougoutas; George R Dodge; Arijitt Borthakur; Jess H Lonner; H Ralph Schumacher; Ravinder Reddy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ali Gordji-Nejad; Klaus Möllenhoff; Ana Maria Oros-Peusquens; Deepu R Pillai; Nadim Jon Shah Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: M T Nieminen; J Rieppo; J Töyräs; J M Hakumäki; J Silvennoinen; M M Hyttinen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sandro Kohl; Simon Meier; Sufian S Ahmad; Harald Bonel; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Anna Krismer; Dimitrios Stergios Evangelopoulos Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 2.359