| Literature DB >> 36072773 |
Qian Liu1, Wanyin Qi1, Yanping Wu2, Yingjun Zhou2, Zhiwei Huang1,3.
Abstract
Objective: Spread through air space (STAS) is an invasive characterization of lung adenocarcinoma and is regarded as a risk factor for poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to develop a random forest model for preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces (STAS) in stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36072773 PMCID: PMC9441384 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2173412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Figure 1CT image samples of pulmonary nodules.
Figure 2Study design process.
Figure 3HE staining (×100) showing STAS (marked by an asterisk).
Postoperative pathological features of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.
| Parameter | STAS negative ( | STAS positive ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery | 0.106 | ||
| Lobectomy or pneumonectomy | 25 (34.2%) | 11 (57.9%) | |
| Sublobar resection | 48 (65.8%) | 8 (42.1%) | |
| Histologic subtypes | 0.020 | ||
| Papillary | 22 (30.1%) | 4 (21.1%) | |
| Solid | 3 (4.11%) | 3 (15.8%) | |
| Lepidic | 23 (31.5%) | 2 (10.5%) | |
| Micropapillary | 3 (4.11%) | 4 (21.1%) | |
| Acinar | 22 (30.1%) | 6 (31.6%) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.005 | ||
| Absent | 69 (94.5%) | 13 (68.4%) | |
| Present | 4 (5.48%) | 6 (31.6%) | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.355 | ||
| Absent | 68 (93.2%) | 16 (84.2%) | |
| Present | 5 (6.85%) | 3 (15.8%) | |
| Pleural invasion | 0.133 | ||
| Absent | 65 (89.0%) | 14 (73.7%) | |
| Present | 8 (11.0%) | 5 (26.3%) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.009 | ||
| Absent | 68 (93.2%) | 13 (68.4%) | |
| Present | 5 (6.85%) | 6 (31.6%) |
Comparison of preoperative clinical imaging data between the STAS-negative group and STAS-positive group of the stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.
| Variable | STAS negative ( | STAS positive ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.549 | ||
| Male | 31 (42.5%) | 6 (31.6%) | |
| Female | 42 (57.5%) | 13 (68.4%) | |
| Age | 53.1 (10.9) | 56.9 (7.61) | 0.085 |
| Maximum CT value (Hu) | -118.38 (141) | 49.1 (62.9) | <0.001 |
| Minimum CT value (Hu) | -553.00 [-659.00, -359.00] | -347.00 [-465.50, -203.00] | 0.001 |
| Mean CT value (Hu) | -321.60 [-442.01, -194.00] | -106.42 [-133.14, -60.51] | <0.001 |
| Variance of CT values (Hu) | 82.3 [58.4, 132] | 115 [93.6, 152] | 0.043 |
| Kurtosis | 2.40 [2.04, 2.50] | 2.43 [2.13, 2.48] | 0.732 |
| Skewness | 0.78 [0.39, 0.94] | -0.75 [-0.84, 0.65] | 0.006 |
| Maximum section area (mm2) | 152 [87.6, 231] | 336 [171, 408] | 0.004 |
| Superficial area (mm2) | 679 [378, 1284] | 1289 [852, 1921] | 0.005 |
| 3D longest diameter (mm) | 16.8 ± 6.01 | 25.3 ± 4.40 | <0.001 |
| Compactness | 0.70 ± 0.17 | 0.61 ± 0.15 | 0.025 |
| Sphericity | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.84 ± 0.08 | 0.041 |
| Entropy | 8.19 [7.81, 8.57] | 8.59 [8.38, 8.94] | <0.001 |
| Location | 0.659 | ||
| Right upper lobe | 26 (35.6%) | 7 (36.8%) | |
| Right lower lobe | 18 (24.7%) | 4 (21.1%) | |
| Right middle lung | 5 (6.85%) | 0 (0.00%) | |
| Left upper lung | 16 (21.9%) | 7 (36.8%) | |
| Left lower lobe | 8 (11.0%) | 1 (5.26%) | |
| Volume (mm3) | 1641 [703, 2997] | 3476 [2345, 4167] | 0.001 |
| CTR | 0.46 [0.41, 0.49] | 0.50 [0.49, 0.64] | <0.001 |
Figure 4Curves of different classification error rates and OBB classification error rates of the random forest model.
Figure 5Ranking model feature importance by decreasing the average Gini value.