| Literature DB >> 36072640 |
Xiaoxia Qiu1, Yongmei Gao2, Tingting Guo1.
Abstract
Based on hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), the antral follicle is explored. The expression of count (AFC) in females at lofty elevation and its clinical significance are analyzed. A total of 82 females in lofty elevation areas and in low-elevation areas who received health checks from April 2020 to May 2021 are selected as the lofty elevation set and the low-elevation set, respectively. In addition, 76 females are served as the routine set. By comparing the serum HIF-1α standards, the standards of sex hormone indexes FSH, LH, and E2, and the expressions of AMH and AFC between the two sets of females, the correlation between HIF-1α and sex hormone indexes and ovarian reserve function is analyzed. The experimental results show that the lofty standard of HIF-1α in females at lofty elevation may lead to abnormal standards of sex hormones and weakened ovarian reserve. The detection of HIF-1α in females in lofty elevation areas is of great significance for evaluating their sex hormone standards, ovarian function, and preventing the occurrence of female gynecological diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36072640 PMCID: PMC9402318 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6112659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Disparities in the serum HIF-1α standards among the two sets of females ( ± s).
| Set | HIF-1 |
|---|---|
| Conventional set ( | 43.15 ± 4.48 |
| Lofty elevation set ( | 102.37 ± 6.32 |
|
| −67.468 |
|
| <0.001 |
Contrast of the disparities in the expression of sex hormone indicators FSH, LH, and E2 among the two sets ( ± s).
| Set | FSH (mIU/mL) | LH (mIU/mL) | E2 (pmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional set ( | 5.53 ± 1.07 | 4.21 ± 0.88 | 119.53 ± 25.67 |
| Lofty elevation set ( | 13.34 ± 3.42 | 6.11 ± 1.21 | 128.26 ± 22.26 |
|
| −19.059 | −11.213 | −2.288 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
Contrast of the disparities in the expression of AMH and AFC among the two sets of females ( ± s).
| Set | AMH (ng/mL) | AFC (individual) |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional set ( | 5.31 ± 0.52 | 8.34 ± 2.26 |
| Lofty elevation set ( | 1.66 ± 1.21 | 3.74 ± 1.76 |
|
| 24.962 | 14.331 |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Correlation between the HIF-1α standard and FSH expression.
Figure 2Correlation between the HIF-1α standard and LH expression.
Figure 3Correlation between the HIF-1α standard and E2 expression.
Figure 4Correlation between the HIF-1α standard and AMH expression.
Figure 5Correlation between the HIF-1α standard and AFC expression.