| Literature DB >> 36072624 |
Xiaochen Sun1, Chengxin Xu1, Juan Lian1, Mei Song1.
Abstract
The clinical efficacy of decellularized adipose tissue (DAT) combined with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the treatment of wound healing in rats is investigated, and the changes of inflammatory factors are analyzed. The tissue defect model of SD (Sprague-Dawley) rats is established and divided into the combined group (n = 12) and the control group (n = 12) according to different treatment methods. The control group is treated with a single VSD technique, and the combined group is treated with DAT on the basis of the control group. The wound healing time of the two groups is observed. Wound tissue is collected 1 day, 10 days, 20 days, and 30 days after treatment, and neutrophil infiltration is observed by HE (hematoxylin-eosin) staining. The expression changes of IL-6 and IL-13 at each time point before and after treatment are compared. Histological observation shows that the cell infiltration is reduced in both groups, and the wound repair in the combined group is better than that in the control group. The experimental results show that the DAT combined with the VSD technique can further speed up wound healing and reduce inflammation in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36072624 PMCID: PMC9420065 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2662876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1DAT materials of different shapes and sizes.
Figure 2Observation under the electron microscope.
Figure 3Observation under the light microscope.
Figure 4HE staining results.
Comparison of hospital indicators.
| Group |
| Wound healing time |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | 12 | 21.14 ± 3.31 |
| Combined group | 12 | 14.44 ± 2.64 |
|
| 13.796 | |
|
| <0.001 |
Value changes in neutrophil count.
| Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined group | 12 | 39.93 ± 4.14 | 27.72 ± 3.35 | 16.63 ± 2.25 | 9.53 ± 1.42 | 7.723 | <0.001 |
| Control group | 12 | 39.72 ± 4.08 | 30.36 ± 3.85 | 22.35 ± 2.73 | 11.74 ± 1.46 | 5.624 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.315 | −4.510 | −14.095 | −9.460 | |||
|
| 0.753 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 5Changes in the neutrophil count.
Figure 6Changes of wound tissue staining at each time point after treatment in the combined group: (a) T1; (b) T2; (c) T3.
Figure 7Changes of wound tissue staining at each time point after treatment in the control group: (a) T1; (b) T2; (c) T3.
The trend of IL-6 changes.
| Group |
| T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 12 | 26.35 ± 3.32 | 21.23 ± 2.21 | 16.63 ± 1.73 | 12.22 ± 1.12 | 7.742 | <0.001 |
| Combined group | 12 | 26.28 ± 3.29 | 18.83 ± 2.04 | 12.34 ± 1.24 | 9.44 ± 1.03 | 11.245 | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||
|
|
Figure 8IL-6 changes.
The trend of IL-13 changes.
| Group |
| T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 12 | 36.63 ± 3.25 | 32.74 ± 2.86 | 29.35 ± 2.78 | 26.63 ± 2.32 | 5.723 | <0.001 |
| Combined group | 12 | 36.66 ± 3.19 | 30.22 ± 2.74 | 24.42 ± 2.53 | 20.16 ± 2.15 | 8.624 | <0.001 |
|
| 0.046 | −4.454 | −9.181 | −14.318 | |||
|
| 0.963 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Figure 9IL-13 changes.