| Literature DB >> 36072622 |
Jin Zhao1, Xiaojing Guo1, Li Ma1, Meijing Zheng1, Tao Guan1, Liping Su1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography scanning (PET/CT) in the evaluation of the effect of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of T lymphoblastic lymphoma. 12 relevant research articles were collected through layer-by-layer screening in large databases such as Pubmed, Baidu Scholar, and China How Net, and analyzed and summarized using indicators such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), hazard ratio (HR), maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and β2-microglobulin (β2-MG). The results showed that before treatment, 18F-FDG PET/CT baseline diagnosis could accurately stage the patients; during treatment, 18F-FDG PET/CT detection could provide effective treatment information; and after treatment, complications were found during 18F-FDG PET/CT detection. In summary, 18F-FDG PET/CT can monitor and evaluate treatment prognosis at baseline, middle, and late stages, and 18F-FDG PET/CT has become an indispensable and important examination technique in clinical work.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36072622 PMCID: PMC9398827 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6057017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.009
Figure 1Classification of lymphoblastic lymphoma.
Figure 2The flow chart of a literature search.
Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT prediction study results statistics.
| References | Research results | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Reference [ | The optimal cut-off values of SUV max, TMTV, and TLG were 12.7, 302 cm3, and 890, respectively; and both PFS and OS were shortened with increasing. | SUVmax, TMTV, and TLG predict T-LBL worsening |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | SUVmax ≤8.76 predicted 3-year event-free survival of 31.6% and overall survival of 35.0% | Low initial SUV max predicts poorer prognosis. |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | SUVmax ≥9.5, disease stage II and III-IV, elevated LDH, elevated | Strongest correlation with PFS and OS |
Statistics of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT prediction study results.
| References | Research results | Research conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Reference [ | 18F-FDG PET/CT facilitated complete recovery and transition to HCT in two patients. | FDG-PET/CT had a new role in the diagnostic and surveillance pathways of complex infections in high-risk immunocompromised patients. |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | There was a significant difference in 18F-FLT intensity between pre-HSCT myeloablative infusion and subclinical stellate recovery ( | 18F-FLT allowed quantification and tracking of human subclinical bone marrow regeneration and reveals new insights into the biology of stellate cell recovery after HSCT. |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | The sensitivity of FLT-PET/CT was lower than that of FDG-PET/CT | The uptake of 18F-FDG in tumor tissue was higher than that of 18F-FLT |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | ASCT 18F-FDG positivity after PET-CT was associated with lower PFS and OS; PET-CT outcome was the only independent factor associated with OS ( | 18F-FDG PET/CT technology had high application value in predicting PFS and OS of patients after stem cell transplantation (especially the 3–6 months window period) |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | PET/CT after HSCT (post-PET) was associated with PFS ( | This meant that PET may help guide subsequent clinical treatment decisions. |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | PET results were associated with 3-year PFS [HR = 4.391, | PET results were a useful prognostic factor in patients undergoing HSCT. |
Statistics of 18F-FDG PET/CT diagnosis and prediction results after treatment.
| References | Research results | Research conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Reference [ | Posttreatment assessment, significantly correlated with ΔSUV max ( | Quantitative and visual assessment of IHP can be reliably used at the end of treatment |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | FDG-PET/(CT) found 27.8% of additional lesions not detected by CT and/or MRI; 29.0% (95% CI: 14.0%–50.5) had a change in FDG-PET(/CT) result or guided treatment %) (I2 = 40.1%). | FDG-PET(/CT) was the most frequently studied imaging modality in patients with PTLD. |
|
| ||
| Reference [ | The pooled sensitivity of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT was 0.90, the overall specificity was 0.90, the positive likelihood ratio was 9.4, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.11, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 83. | F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT had high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of PTLD. |
Figure 3Preparation and application process of the 18F-FDG drug.
Figure 4The imaging principle of 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Application limitations of 18F-FDG PET/CT.
| Reference no. | Title | Research objective | Application limitations of 18F-FDG PET/CT |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | 18F-FLT-PET/CT adds value to 18F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing relapse after definitive radiotherapy in patients with lung cancer. Results of a prospective clinical trial | It investigated the value of 18F-FLT-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in diagnosing recurrence of radiation cancer | The specificity of 18F-FLT-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of cancer patients after recurrence was reduced, and the efficiency of single application was significantly lower than the effect of the combination of the two |
|
| |||
| [ | Prognostic value of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in lymphoma using deauville scores | It aimed to evaluate 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in lymphoma autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) | Applicable time was limited. |
|
| |||
| [ | Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in T-Lymphoblastic lymphoma before and after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation | It was to evaluate the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with relapsed or refractory t-lymphoid transplantation (T-LBL) undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). | Pre-PET failed to predict PFS and OS in T-LBL patients treated with HSCT. |
|
| |||
| [ | Prediction of outcome in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma based on interpretation of 18FDG-PET/CT according to DSUVmax, deauville 5-point scale and IHP criteria | It compared different interpretation methods of 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting disease prognosis to determine the best method in this regard | Effective evaluation indicators for predicting disease prognosis were different before and after treatment, and further research was needed to find the best indicator |
|
| |||
| [ | Performance of advanced imaging modalities at diagnosis and treatment response evaluation of patients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis | It aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of advanced imaging modalities in the diagnosis and treatment response assessment of PTLD patients after solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation | FDG-PET(/CT) was well-applied for detection, staging, and treatment evaluation, but has methodological flaws, false-negatives due to physiologic high background activity and early PTLD lesions, and false-positives due to inflammatory conditions |
|
| |||
| [ | Diagnostic performances of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis | It aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET or PET/CT for the detection of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) | The scope of the study was limited and further large multicenter studies were needed to confirm |