Literature DB >> 36072441

Impact of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes According to the National Readmission Database.

Ahmed M Maraey1,2, Muhammad Haisum Maqsood3, Mahmoud Khalil3,4, Ahmed Hashim5, Ahmed M Elzanaty6, Hadeer R Elsharnoby7, Eman Elsheikh4, Lamiaa Elbatanony4, Kenneth Ong8, Paul Chacko6.   

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). There is a paucity of contemporary data studying the association between COPD and outcomes of AF ablation. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of COPD on AF ablation outcomes using a large nationwide database. This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Readmission Database for the years 2016-2018 and included patients admitted with a diagnosis of AF who underwent catheter ablation. Admissions were stratified according to COPD diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariate, linear, Cox, and logistic regressions were performed to study the impact of COPD on AF ablation. A total of 18,224 admissions (mean age, 68 years; standard deviation, 10 years) were included, of whom 3,494 (19%) had a diagnosis of COPD. The COPD group was older (72 ± 8 vs. 67 ± 11 years, P < .001) and more likely to have congestive heart failure (73% vs. 44%, P < .001) and renal failure (31% vs. 17%, P < .001). COPD was associated with an increased risk of readmission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.56; P < .001) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.74-4.60; P < .001). However, COPD was not associated with an increased risk of readmission due to recurrent AF (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75-1.27; P = .844) or the need for re-ablation (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.44-1.65; P = .639), respectively. In conclusion, COPD was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent AF after ablation despite higher periprocedural risks. The present study contributes to a better understanding of this high-risk subgroup of patients undergoing AF ablation. Copyright:
© 2022 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; COPD; catheter ablation; mortality; outcome; readmission

Year:  2022        PMID: 36072441      PMCID: PMC9436400          DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag        ISSN: 2156-3977


Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease characterized by airflow limitations due to small airway disease (obstructive bronchiolitis) and parenchymal destruction (emphysema), leading to expiratory flow limitation and hyperinflation. COPD continues to pose a growing contribution to the overall prevalence of non-communicable diseases.[1] It was estimated that the global prevalence of COPD was 11.7% by 2010.[2] In addition, COPD is usually associated with other comorbidities, especially atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia affecting 33.5 million people globally.[3,4] COPD is present in about 23% of patients diagnosed with AF.[5-7] AF development is directly associated with the frequency of COPD exacerbation.[8] The co-presence of both COPD and AF represents an extra challenge that requires tailoring any medical interventions to minimize any potential collateral damage. In this study, we have investigated the potential effect of COPD on the outcomes of AF ablation.

Methods

Data source

This was a retrospective cohort study performed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) for the years 2016–2018.[9] The NRD is the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient health care readmission database in the United States. Data in the NRD are drawn from HCUP state inpatient databases containing verified patient linkage numbers that can be used to track a person across hospitals within a state while adhering to strict privacy guidelines. It provides longitudinal information about patients’ initial hospitalization and subsequent readmissions in a calendar year. It contains a weighted sample of hospitalizations in the United States, and this can be used to directly derive national estimates of various hospitalizations. National estimates were produced using sampling weights provided by the sponsor. All values presented are weighted estimates.

Study population

Our study population included admissions with a diagnosis of AF who underwent catheter ablation. To define the admissions with AF who underwent catheter ablation, we used the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10), Clinical Modification, codes for AF who underwent catheter ablation (ICD-10 Procedure Coding System codes [02573ZZ, 025S3ZZ, 025T3ZZ, 02583ZZ]) (. Admissions with a diagnosis of other cardiac arrhythmias for which an ablation procedure may be required were excluded. Arrhythmias excluded were supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, ventricular premature beats, pre-excitation syndrome, atrioventricular (AV) nodal tachycardia, and atrial tachycardia. Also, to avoid inclusion of patients undergoing AV junction ablation, we excluded admissions with codes indicating prior or current implantation of a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. This approach for the identification of admissions with AF and catheter ablation has been previously described and used by other investigators.[10] In NRD, patient identifiers cannot be linked across years. Hence, index admissions on July 1 or beyond were excluded to allow 6 months of follow-up. Other exclusion criteria were admissions with age <18 years and those with missing data. In accordance with the HCUP data use agreement, we excluded reporting any variable containing a small number of observations (≤10) that could pose a risk of person identification or data privacy violation. This study was exempted from approval by the institutional review board because of the anonymized and de-identified data in the NRD.

Study outcomes

Primary outcomes were 180-day readmission with recurrent AF, AF re-ablation, and all-cause readmissions after index admissions for AF ablation. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, iatrogenic cardiac complication, postprocedural bleeding, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, acute kidney injury (AKI), and acute heart failure. Index admission was defined as the first admission with the primary diagnosis of AF without prior admission in a 180-day period. A readmission was defined as the first readmission within 180 days of admission.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test. Multivariate regression analyses were used to study the association between COPD and AF ablation outcomes and to adjust for confounders: age; sex; median income; primary insurance; hospital bed size; hospital teaching status; and chronic comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, liver disease, history of myocardial infarction, history of percutaneous coronary intervention, and history of coronary artery bypass graft. Logistic regression was used for dichotomous in-hospital outcomes, and linear regression was used for continuous outcomes. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used in readmission outcomes. In-hospital mortality admissions were excluded from readmission analysis. Continuous data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) values. All P values were 2-sided, with 0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance. Data analysis was performed using STATA 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Baseline characteristics

Our cohort included 18,224 AF ablation admissions (mean age, 68 ± 10 years) between January and June of 2016–2018, of whom 3,494 (19%) admissions had a diagnosis of COPD. The mean age was different between the COPD group and the non-COPD group (72 ± 8 and 67 ± 11 years, P < .001, respectively). COPD admissions were likely to be women (46% vs. 43%, P = .02). Medicare was the primary insurance in the cohort; however, COPD admissions were more likely to have Medicare insurance (81% vs. 60%, P < .001). AF ablation was less likely to be done in a teaching hospital among the COPD group (80% vs. 95%, P < .001). COPD admissions were more likely to have congestive heart failure (73% vs. 44%, P < .001), peripheral vascular disorder (21% vs. 12%, P < .001), renal failure (31% vs. 17%, P < .001), chronic respiratory failure (18% vs. 1%, P < .001), and hypothyroidism (20% vs. 16%, P < .001). Other baseline characteristics stratified according to the presence or absence of COPD are included in .

Outcomes

A total of 5,209 readmissions within 180 days occurred after AF ablation, of whom 1,505 (29%) carried a diagnosis of COPD. COPD was associated with an increased risk of readmission after adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–1.56; P < .001). There were a total of 746 readmissions with AF, of whom 151 underwent re-ablation. COPD was not associated with an increased risk of readmission due to recurrent AF (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75–1.27; P = .844) or the need for re-ablation (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.44–1.65; P = .639) (. In-hospital mortality occurred in 168 (1%) admissions. COPD was associated with an increased in-hospital mortality. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 2.83 (95% CI, 1.74–4.60; P < .001). In terms of periprocedural complications, COPD was not associated with an increased odds of postprocedural hemorrhage (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.36–1.06; P = .083), iatrogenic cardiac complications (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.54–1.76; P = .927), cardiac tamponade (aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.38–1.13; P = .131), acute myocardial infarction (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.80–1.64; P = .465), or stroke (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.77–2.11; P = .348). However, it was associated with an increased risk of acute heart failure (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.26–1.56; P < .001) and AKI (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03–1.49; P = .022) (.

Discussion

This nationally representative analysis of 18,224 AF admissions who underwent ablation, using NRD data from the years 2016–2018, found no difference in 180-day readmission due to AF or re-ablation despite the higher risk of all-cause readmissions and some periprocedural complications, such as acute heart failure, in-hospital mortality, and AKI, in the COPD group compared to the non-COPD group. Other periprocedural complications, such as acute myocardial infarction, iatrogenic cardiac complications, postprocedural hemorrhage, cardiac tamponade and hemopericardium, and stroke/TIA, were not different between the 2 groups. It is well known that COPD has been associated with an increased incidence of AF,[11-13] which is attributed to increased arrhythmogenicity from hypoxia,[14] hypercapnia,[15] pulmonary hypertension,[16] ventricular remodeling,[17] inflammation,[18] and respiratory drug use.[19] At a biochemical level, the forementioned stresses are hypothesized to induce the production of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a, vascular endothelial growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 through a cascade of reactions that ultimately leads to atrial fibrosis.[14,20-22] In 2011, a retrospective study on AF ablation from South Korea from 2000–2009 sparked a huge interest in AF ablation in chronic lung disease patients.[23] They did not only find out that chronic lung disease changes the pulmonary vein anatomy and makes it more arrhythmogenic but also reported that non-pulmonary vein foci–related AF was more common in chronic lung disease patients. In 2015, a review by Goudis on the relationship between COPD and AF highlighted the need for studies on AF ablation outcomes in COPD patients.[24] Similarly, the abovementioned gap was reinforced in recent reviews on AF, COPD, and pulmonary hypertension.[25,26] So, this nationally representative cohort of American adult patients is the first large study to evaluate the outcomes of AF ablation in patients with COPD. This is also the first study of its kind, which evaluated 180-day readmission and other procedure-related complications of AF ablation. A national cohort analysis of years 2010–2014, which evaluated causes and predictors of readmission (30-day and 90-day readmission) post-ablation, found that patients with chronic pulmonary disease have a higher risk of readmission and COPD is an independent predictor of readmission.[10] The results of that analysis align with our analysis, which showed a significantly higher risk of readmission in COPD patients. AF has been challenging to control in patients with COPD. Non-COPD status was one of the independent predictors of successful electrical cardioversion at 1 year of follow-up in the Euro Heart Survey (P = .003).[27] A prospective study by Gu et al. on 550 consecutive patients with symptomatic and medication-refractory AF with first catheter ablation found a significantly greater recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with COPD versus patients without COPD (44% vs. 28.6%, P = .016) with a mean follow-up of 31.4 months.[28] In contrast, our analysis with a shorter follow-up duration (6 months) did not find differences between the 2 arms (COPD vs. non-COPD) in readmission with AF or the need for repeat ablation. Our study demonstrated that post-ablation in-hospital mortality in patients was higher in the COPD group (2% vs. 1%, P < .001). Our results are comparable to those of a multicenter analysis of AF patients from 13 hospitals in China from 2008–2011. The study found that the prevalence of COPD was significantly higher in the mortality group than the survival group (21.4% vs. 10.1%, P ≤ .01).[29] In the present study, we observed a higher risk of acute congestive heart failure and AKI in the COPD group. New-onset congestive heart failure was reported following AF catheter ablation by Tan et al.[30] Congestive heart failure was found to be an independent predictor of worsening renal function in a prospective study done by Kawaji et al. on 791 non-dialysis patients who underwent AF ablation.[31] Due to the lack of patient-level data in the administrative database, such as the degree of ejection fraction reduction and the level of kidney impairment, we could not further investigate the increased risk of acute heart failure and AKI in COPD patients. We hypothesize that the difference was likely due to the higher prevalence of chronic heart failure and chronic kidney disease in the COPD arm and the strong correlation between COPD and congestive heart failure. COPD has been associated with a greater risk of arteriovascular events, including ischemic stroke, cerebrovascular events, TIAs, and myocardial infarctions.[32-34] Similarly, COPD patients are more likely to have peripheral vascular diseases and atherosclerosis.[35] The present study did not find a difference in outcomes of in-hospital occurrence of acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke/TIA between the 2 groups segregated based on COPD status. However, our study evaluated these outcomes if they happened during the index admission. It would be interesting to see future studies on post-ablation vascular complications in the 2 groups.

Limitations

This study should be interpreted in light of some important limitations. First, it is an observational study subject to confounding bias despite statistical adjustment. Second, the severity of COPD and other comorbidities, anti-arrhythmic medication use, and medication compliance could not be assessed due to the administrative nature of the database, which is also subject to coding errors. Third, a real-world all-payer, nationally representative NRD cohort could not include all admissions in the United States, so it might over- or underestimate the overall difference in outcomes. Additionally, AF recurrence without admission was not captured. Fourth, the follow-up period was relatively short as admissions cannot be linked across years. Longer-term follow-up will be an area for future research.

Conclusion

Despite being a risk factor for the development of AF, COPD was not associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence after the ablation procedure. However, it was associated with increased AF ablation periprocedural complications. The present study contributes to a better understanding of this high-risk subgroup of patients undergoing AF ablation. The development of a nationally valid risk stratification model and improving post-hospital care have the potential to offset some of the risks inherent to ablating AF in COPD patients.
Table 1:

Baseline Characteristics Stratified According to the Presence or Absence of COPD

CharacteristicsAF Ablation
P Value
No COPD (n = 14,523)COPD (n = 3,432)
Female sex 6,318 (43%)1,881 (46%).018
Mean age in years (SD) 72 (±8)67 (±11)<.001
Median household income quartile for zip code per percentile <.001
 <25th3,089 (21%)944 (28%)
 25th–50th3,687 (25%)987 (29%)
 50th–75th3,735 (26%)877 (26%)
 ;75th4,011 (28%)623 (18%)
Insurance <.001
 Medicare8,854 (60%)2,815 (81%)
 Medicaid623 (4%)187 (5%)
 Private4,804 (33%)408 (12%)
 Self-pay109 (1%)22 (1%)
 Other/no charge334 (2%)60 (2%)
Hospital bed size .196
 Small899 (6%)263 (8%)
 Medium3,956 (27%)972 (25%)
 Large9,875 (67%)2,259 (65%)
Teaching hospital 12,493 (85%)2,802 (80%)
Charlson Comorbidity Index score<.001
 ≤18,926 (60%)445 (13%)
 22,304 (16%)850 (24%)
 ≥33,500 (24%)2,198 (63%)
Comorbidities
 Congestive heart failure6,492 (44%)2,563 (73%)<.001
 Valvular heart disease3,257 (22%)950 (27%)<.001
 Peripheral vascular disease1,803 (12%)748 (21%)<.001
 Pulmonary circulatory disorder1,110 (8%)590 (17%)<.001
 Uncomplicated hypertension6,617 (45%)1,147 (33%)<.001
 Complicated hypertension4,570 (31%)1916 (55%)<.001
 History of myocardial infarction1,052 (7%)462 (13%)<.001
 History of PCI1,327 (9%)503 (14%)<.001
 History of CABG927 (6%)370 (11%)<.001
 History of stroke1,109 (8%)327 (9%).014
 Renal failure2,571 (17%)1,081 (31%)<.001
 Obesity3,484 (24%)990 (28%)<.001
 Hypothyroidism2,338 (16%)707 (20%)<.001
 Dyslipidemia6,553 (44%)1,750 (50%)<.001
 Diabetes without complications2,289 (16%)610 (17%).045
 Diabetes with complications1,456 (10%)682 (20%)<.001
 Liver disease349 (2%)156 (4%)<.001
 Alcohol abuse327 (2%)167 (5%)<.001
 Drug abuse132 (1%)67 (2%)<.001

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2:

Study Outcomes

OutcomeAF Ablation
P Value
No COPD (n = 14,523)COPD (n = 3,432)
In-hospital mortality (n) 88 (1%)80 (2%)<.001
 Adjusted odds ratioReference2.83 (95% CI, 1.74–4.60)<.001
Acute kidney injury (n) 1,711 (12%)809 (23%)<.001
 Adjusted odds ratioReference1.24 (95% CI, 1.03–1.49).022
Acute myocardial infarction 250 (2%)99 (3%).002
 Adjusted odds ratioReference1.14 (95% CI, 0.8–1.6).47
Iatrogenic cardiac complication 164 (1%)36 (1%).78
 Adjusted odds ratioReference0.97 (95% CI, 0.54–1.76).93
Postprocedural hemorrhage230 (2%)34 (1%).062
 Adjusted odds ratioReference0.62 (95% CI, 0.36–1.06).083
Cardiac tamponade and hemopericardium 219 (1%)28 (1%).022
 Adjusted odds ratioReference0.66 (95% CI, 0.38–1.13).131
Stroke or TIA 147 (1%)47 (1%).204
 Adjusted odds ratioReference1.27 (95% CI, 0.77–2.11).35
Acute heart failure 2,735 (19%)1,466 (42%)<.001
 Adjusted odds ratioReference1.45 (95% CI, 1.24–1.70)<.001
180-day all-cause readmission 3,700 (25%)1,505 (44%)<.001
 Adjusted hazard ratioReference1.40 (95% CI, 1.26–1.56)<.001
Readmission due to atrial fibrillation 627 (4%)119 (3%).12
 Adjusted hazard ratioReference0.97 (95% CI, 0.75–1.27).844
Need for repeat ablation 131 (1%)20 (1%).18
 Adjusted hazard ratioReference0.85 (95% CI, 0.44–1.65).639

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; TIA, transient ischemic attack.

Supplementary Table 1:

International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) Codes Used to Identify Key Variables

Atrial Fibrillation I48, I48.0, I48.1, I48.11, I48.19, I48.2, I48.20, I48.21, I48.91
Catheter ablation 02573ZZ, 025S3ZZ, 025T3ZZ, 02583ZZ
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease J44, J44.0, J44.1, J44.9, J41, J41.0, J41.1, J41.8, J42, J43.0, J43.1, J43.2, J43.8, J43.9
Premature ventricular complexes I49.3
Supraventricular tachycardia I47.1
Ventricular premature depolarization I49.3
Pre-excitation syndrome I45.6
Presence of pacemaker Z95.0
Paroxysmal tachycardia I47.9
Atrial flutter I489.2, I48.3, I48.4
Postprocedural hemorrhage I97.610, I97.618, I97.620, I97.638, J95.830, K91.841, K91.871
Iatrogenic cardiac complications I97.790, I97.88, I97.89
Hemopericardium I31.2
Cardiac tamponade I31.4
Acute myocardial infarction I21.4, I21.9, I21.3, I21.09, I21.19, I21.02, I21.21, I21.01, I21.11, I21.29
Uncomplicated hypertension I10.x
Complicated hypertension I11.x-I13.x, I15.x
Valvular heart disease A52.0, I05.x - I08.x, I09.1, I09.8, I34.x - I39.x, Q23.0 - Q23.3, Z95.2 - Z95.4
Pulmonary circulation disorders I26.x, I27.x, I28.0, I28.8, I28.9
Peripheral vascular disorders I70.x, I71.x, I72.x, I73.1, I73.8, I73.9, I77.1, I77.7, I79.0, I79.1, I79.8, I79.2, K55.1, K55.8, K55.9, Z95.8, Z95.9
Uncomplicated diabetes mellitus E08.9, E09.9, E10.9, E11.9, E13.9
Complicated diabetes mellitus E08.2-E08.8, E09.x, E10.2 - E10.8, E11.2 - E11.8, E12.2 - E12.8, E13.2 - E13.8
Hypothyroidism E00.x - E03.x
Obesity E66.x, Z68.3, Z68.4, Z68.5
Liver disease B18.x, I85.x, K70.x, K71.1, K71.3 - K71.5, K71.7, K72.x - K74.x, K75.4, K75.8, K76.0, K76.2 - K76.9, Z94.4
Obesity E66.x, Z68.3, Z68.4, Z68.5
Deficiency anemia D501, D50.8, D50.9, D51.x - D53.x, D63.1, D63.8
Alcohol abuse F10, E52, G62.1, I42.6, K29.2, K70.0, K70.3, K70.9, T51.x, Z71.4
Drug abuse F11.x - F16.x, F18.x, F19.x, Z71.5
Prior myocardial infarction I25.2
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention Z98.61, Z95.5
Prior coronary artery bypass grafting Z95.1
Dyslipidemia E78.5
  34 in total

Review 1.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation: An unknown relationship.

Authors:  Christos A Goudis
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The role of Toll-like receptor 2 and hypoxia-induced transcription factor-1α in the atrial structural remodeling of non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Yanmin Xu; Deepak Sharma; Fawang Du; Yuzhi Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the development of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Maxim Grymonprez; Vincent Vakaet; Maryam Kavousi; Bruno H Stricker; M Arfan Ikram; Jan Heeringa; Oscar H Franco; Guy G Brusselle; Lies Lahousse
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on prognosis in atrial fibrillation: A report from the EURObservational Research Programme Pilot Survey on Atrial Fibrillation (EORP-AF) General Registry.

Authors:  Marco Proietti; Cécile Laroche; Marcin Drozd; Johan Vijgen; Dragos C Cozma; Jaroslaw Drozdz; Aldo P Maggioni; Giuseppe Boriani; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Congestive heart failure after extensive catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characterization, and outcome.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Tan; Xin-Hua Wang; Hai-Feng Shi; Yu-Ming Sun; Li Zhou; Jia-Ning Gu; Bing Han; Wei-Feng Jiang; Guo-Shu Yang; Xu Liu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-01-14

6.  Increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke following exacerbation of COPD.

Authors:  Gavin C Donaldson; John R Hurst; Christopher J Smith; Richard B Hubbard; Jadwiga A Wedzicha
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation: an interdisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Sami O Simons; Adrian Elliott; Manuel Sastry; Jeroen M Hendriks; Michael Arzt; Michiel Rienstra; Jonathan M Kalman; Hein Heidbuchel; Stanley Nattel; Geertjan Wesseling; Ulrich Schotten; Isabelle C van Gelder; Frits M E Franssen; Prashanthan Sanders; Harry J G M Crijns; Dominik Linz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Reduced forced expiratory volume is associated with increased incidence of atrial fibrillation: the Malmo Preventive Project.

Authors:  Linda S B Johnson; Tord Juhlin; Gunnar Engström; Peter M Nilsson
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 5.214

9.  Airflow obstruction, lung function, and incidence of atrial fibrillation: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

Authors:  Jingjing Li; Sunil K Agarwal; Alvaro Alonso; Saul Blecker; Alanna M Chamberlain; Stephanie J London; Laura R Loehr; Ann Marie McNeill; Charles Poole; Elsayed Z Soliman; Gerardo Heiss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davies Adeloye; Stephen Chua; Chinwei Lee; Catriona Basquill; Angeliki Papana; Evropi Theodoratou; Harish Nair; Danijela Gasevic; Devi Sridhar; Harry Campbell; Kit Yee Chan; Aziz Sheikh; Igor Rudan
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.