Literature DB >> 36072136

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 2,4,6-tri-amino-pyrimidine-1,3-diium dinitrate.

Sumra Dilshad1, Emine Berrin Çınar2, Arif Ali1, Adeeba Ahmed1, Mohd Jane Alam3, Musheer Ahmad1, Aiman Ahmad1, Necmi Dege2, Eiad Saif4.   

Abstract

The title compound, C4H9N5 2+·2NO3 -, crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system, space group P21/c. The asymmetric unit, which comprises a diprotonated tri-amino-pyrimidine dication and two nitrate anions, has an almost planar geometry with a dihedral angle of 0.92 (4)° between the mean plane of the cation and that defined by both anions. In the crystal, hydrogen-bonding inter-actions between the 2,4,6-tri-amino-pyrimidine cation and the nitrate anions lead to a one-dimensional supra-molecular network with weak anionic inter-actions forming a three-dimensional network. These inter-actions were investigated using Hirshfeld surface analysis, which indicates that the most important contributions for the packing arrangement are from O⋯H/H⋯O (53.2%), N⋯H/H⋯N (12.5%) and C⋯H/H⋯C (9.6%) inter-actions. Energy framework analysis showed that of the components of the framework energies, electrostatic repulsion (E rep) is dominant. © Dilshad et al. 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface; crystal structure; energy framework; hydrogen bond; pyrimidine

Year:  2022        PMID: 36072136      PMCID: PMC9431786          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989022005333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Nitro­gen heterocycles and pyrimidines are examples of the most important biologically active compounds and find wide use in modern medicine (Pałasz & Cież, 2015 ▸; Takeshita et al., 2006 ▸; Henderson et al., 2003 ▸). Pyrimidine derivatives are used as inter­mediates for the production of various complex organic mol­ecules for the treatment of cancer and AIDS (Fawcett et al., 1996 ▸). Several pyrimidine derivatives belong to the class of central nervous system depressants (Soayed et al., 2015 ▸). Pyrimidine and its derivatives have great importance as they constitute a significant class of natural and non-natural products, many of which possess remarkable biological activities and clinical applications such as anti­bacterial, anti­malarial and anti­cancer agents (Sharma et al., 2014 ▸). Many pyrimidine derivatives are reported to possess potential central nervous system (CNS) depressant properties and also act as calcium channel blockers (Kumar et al., 2002 ▸). Pyrimido[4,5-d]pyrimidine-2,5-dione and 2,4-di­amino-5-(substituted)pyrimidines have been reported to have potent anti­microbial activity (Sharma et al., 2004 ▸) and 2,4,6-tri­amino­pyrimidine (TAP) acts as a fast-killing and long-acting anti­malarial agent (Hameed, et al., 2015 ▸). It is also known to inhibit sodium transport in the skin of frogs (Bowman et al., 1978 ▸). It can be synthesized by a regioselective cyclo­addition process in high yield by reaction between two moles of cyanamide and one mole of ynamide in the presence of triflic acid as catalyst (Dubovtsev, et al., 2021 ▸). Many pyrimidine derivatives display inter­esting optical and sensing properties (Achelle et al., 2012 ▸, Seenan et al., 2020 ▸). Methyl­pyrimidinium push–pull derivatives have been shown to be promising materials for optical data processing. Organometallic meth­yl­pyrimidinium chromophores incorporating a ruthenium fragment within the π-conjugated spacer are among the best metal–diyne NLO chromophores (Fecková, et al., 2020 ▸). Herein, we report the structure of 2,4,6-tri­amino-1,3,5-tri­azine-1,3-diium dinitrate, Fig. 1 ▸, which was synthesized via reaction of 2,4,6-tri­amino­pyrimidine with nitric acid.
Figure 1

ORTEP diagram of the title compound with atom labeling and 50% probability ellipsoids.

Structural commentary

In the asymmetric unit, the mean planes of the nitrate anions are inclined to one another by 5.97 (8)°. The plane of the anion containing N6 is inclined to the mean plane of the cation by 3.25 (6)° while that of the other anion is inclined by 2.84 (6)°. Thus the whole asymmetric unit lies close to a common plane (Fig.1). The ring C—N bond lengths in the cation [C1—N2 = 1.3531 (16) Å and C2—N3 = 1.3267 (16) Å] are only slightly altered from those in the corresponding conjugate base (Schwalbe et al., 1982 ▸). The C—C bond lengths in the pyrimidine ring [C2—C3 = 1.3834 (18) and C3—C4 = 1.3888 (17) Å] are consistent with literature values (Ali et al., 2021 ▸). The exocyclic C2—N3 and C4—N4 bond lengths [1.3267 (16) and 1.3240 (17) Å, respectively] are equivalent within experimental error but the C1—N1 bond length is markedly shorter at 1.3010 (17) Å. As it lies between the two protonated ring nitro­gen atoms, this suggests that the neighboring positive charge induces a contribution from a charge-separated quinoid form to the overall electronic structure, as has been proposed for the analogous chloride salt (Portalone & Colapietro, 2007 ▸)

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, a combination of N1—H1A⋯O2, N5—H5⋯O4, N4—H4A⋯O6, N3—H1A⋯O3 and N3—H3B⋯O5 hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) leads to the formation of ribbons of alternating cations and anions extending along the b-axis direction. The mean planes of the ribbons are parallel to (101). Pairs of adjacent ribbons are linked by N1—H1B⋯O3, N2—H2⋯O1 and N3—H3A⋯O3 hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸), with these units further connected into cation/anion layers by complementary N4—H4B⋯O6 hydrogen bonds. The two unique nitrate ions are connected to the cation by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸), forming units with an (8) graph-set motif (Fig. 2 ▸). This tight hydrogen-bonded network causes a short O2⋯O4 contact of 2.7752 (15) Å. Finally, the layers appear to be associated through N=O⋯π(ring) inter­actions N6=O3⋯Cg1i and N7=O5⋯Cg1ii (Cg1i is the centroid of the pyrimidine ring at −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; Cg ii is the centroid of the pyrimidine ring at −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1) with O3⋯Cg1i = 3.1369 (11) Å, N6⋯Cg1i = 3.4241 (12) Å, N6=O3⋯Cg1i = 92.16 (7)°; O5⋯Cg1ii = 3.0265 (11) Å; N7⋯Cg1ii = 3.5176 (12) Å; N7=O5⋯Cg1ii = 102.62 (7)° (Fig. 3 ▸).
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N5—H5⋯O40.861.882.7321 (15)174
N2—H2⋯O1i 0.861.982.8319 (15)169
N4—H4A⋯O60.862.082.9428 (15)177
N4—H4B⋯O5ii 0.862.433.0706 (16)131
N4—H4B⋯O6ii 0.862.112.9593 (15)172
N1—H1A⋯O20.861.972.7986 (15)160
N1—H1B⋯O3i 0.861.942.7912 (15)172
N3—H3A⋯O3iii 0.862.163.0018 (14)167
N3—H3A⋯O2iii 0.862.542.9770 (15)113
N3—H3B⋯O5iii 0.862.263.0619 (15)156
C3—H3⋯O5iii 0.932.563.3134 (16)139

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Figure 2

A portion of one cation/anion layer projected onto (101) with N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds depicted by dashed lines.

Figure 3

Packing view of the title compound showing the anionic–π inter­action that forms the supra­molecular structure.

Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

The Hirshfeld surface analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka et al. 2009 ▸) was performed and the two-dimensional fingerprint plots (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) were generated with Crystal Explorer17 (Turner et al., 2017 ▸) to qu­antify the inter­molecular contacts present within the crystal structure. The Hirshfeld surface is mapped over d norm in the range −0.6823 to 0.9826 in arbitrary units with colors ranging from red (shorter distance than the sum of van der Waals radii) through white to blue (longer distance than the sum of the van der Waals radii). Top and bottom views of the surface together with curvedness, and shape-index plots are given in Fig. 4 ▸ a–d. The red spots symbolize N—H⋯O contacts and C—H⋯O inter­actions. The fingerprint plots (Fig. 5 ▸) give an insight into the overall packing characteristics of the contents of the unit cell, being plots of d e versus d i, where d i is the distance to the nearest atom center inter­ior to the surface, and d e to the nearest atom exterior to the surface. These plots show that the main contributions to the overall surface involve O⋯H/H⋯O contacts at 53.2% (Fig. 5 ▸ b), followed by N⋯H/H⋯N contacts at 12.5% (Fig. 5 ▸ c) and C⋯H/H⋯C contacts at 9.6% (Fig. 5 ▸ d).
Figure 4

The Hirshfeld surface of the title complex mapped over (a) d norm (top view), (b) d norm (bottom view), (c) curvedness and (d) shape-index.

Figure 5

(a) The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot, and those delineated into (b) O⋯H/H⋯O, (c) N⋯H/H⋯N and (d) C⋯H/H⋯C inter­actions.

Synthesis and crystallization

To synthesize the title compound, 20 mg of 2,4,6-tri­amino­pyrimidine were dissolved in ethanol (10 mL) and the solution stirred for 3 h. A mixture of ethanol (5 mL) and nitric acid (0.5 mL) was taken in a separate round-bottom flask and stirred for 3 h at 333 K. Afterwards, the 2,4,6-tri­amino­pyrimidine solution was added dropwise to the above mixture. The reaction was continued for 4 h at the same temperature. After completion of the reaction, a pale-yellow solution was obtained, which was filtered and kept for slow evaporation at room temperature. After 15 days, pale-yellow crystals were obtained that were suitable for data collection (Fig. 6 ▸).
Figure 6

Synthesis of title compound.

Inter­action energy calculations

The inter­action energies for the title compound (Fig. 7 ▸). were computed using the HF/3-21G quantum level of theory, which is available in CrystalExplorer 17.5. Electrostatic (E ele), polarization (E pol), dispersion (E disp), and exchange-repulsion (E rep) are the four energy variables that make up the total inter­molecular inter­action energy (E tot). Cylinder-shaped energy frameworks represent the relative strengths of inter­action energies in individual directions and give the topologies of pair-wise inter­molecular inter­action energies within the crystal (Mackenzie et al., 2017 ▸). The energies between mol­ecular pairs are represented as cylinders connecting the centroids of pairs of mol­ecules, with the cylinder radius equal to the amount of inter­action energy between the mol­ecules (Wu et al., 2020 ▸). The dark-blue-colored mol­ecule at symmetry position (x, −y +  , z +  ) located 6.25 Å from the centroid of the selected mol­ecule has the highest total inter­action energy of −40.1 kJ mol−1, as shown in Fig.7. The net inter­action energies for the title compound are E ele = −58.9 kJ mol−1, E pol = −92.0 kJ mol−1, E dis = −148.8 kJ mol−1, E rep = 176.9 kJ mol−1, with a total inter­action energy E tot of −110.4 kJ mol−1 (Fig. 8 ▸). Clearly, E rep is the major inter­action energy in the title compound.
Figure 7

Inter­action energies for the title compound were calculated with the HF/3–21 G model.

Figure 8

Energy frameworks for a 2×2×2 supercell viewed down the crystallographic b axis for the threefold inter­penetrated crystal structure. The red-colored frame shows the Coulombic energy, green shows dispersion, and blue shows total energy.

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.43, update of March 2022; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for the tri­amino­pyrimidine dication gave 24 hits of which 16 were for the FPO3 2− salt studied at a variety of temperatures (GESWAF–GESWAF15; Matulková et al., 2017 ▸) but no structure containing nitrate anions was found. The remaining structures contain arene­sulfonate (TEYTEZ, TEYTID and TEYXIH; Karak et al., 2018 ▸), various polycarboxyl­ate (VEXQEX, VEXZUW and VEYBEJ; Xing, et al., 2017 ▸), chloride (GIMROK; Portalone & Colapietro, 2007 ▸) and [Cu2Cl8]4− (GOHDOY; Voronina et al., 2012 ▸) anions. Most of the discussions of these structures are concerned more with their supra­molecular structures than the detailed geometry of the cation but, as noted in Section 3, some details similar to those in the present work are seen in the structure of the chloride salt.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All H atoms were originally found in difference maps. Thy were positioned geometrically (N—H = 0.86 Å, C—H = 0.93 Å) and refined as riding with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C,N).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC4H9N5 2+·2NO3
M r 251.18
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)276
a, b, c (Å)7.8650 (5), 9.9173 (6), 12.2291 (7)
β (°)100.836 (2)
V3)936.86 (10)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.16
Crystal size (mm)0.37 × 0.27 × 0.14
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections13469, 2312, 1993
R int 0.070
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.668
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.040, 0.110, 1.07
No. of reflections2312
No. of parameters154
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.51, −0.30

Computer programs: X-AREA and X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2002 ▸), SHELXT2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020 ▸), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), PLATON (Spek, 2020 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989022005333/mw2185sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989022005333/mw2185Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 2173730 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H9N52+·2NO3F(000) = 520
Mr = 251.18Dx = 1.781 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.8650 (5) ÅCell parameters from 8448 reflections
b = 9.9173 (6) Åθ = 2.3–25.6°
c = 12.2291 (7) ŵ = 0.16 mm1
β = 100.836 (2)°T = 276 K
V = 936.86 (10) Å3Needle, colourless
Z = 40.37 × 0.27 × 0.14 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometerRint = 0.070
φ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.6°
13469 measured reflectionsh = −10→10
2312 independent reflectionsk = −13→13
1993 reflections with I > 2σ(I)l = −16→16
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.110w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0497P)2 + 0.4576P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2312 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.51 e Å3
154 parametersΔρmin = −0.30 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O30.54263 (12)0.80420 (9)0.71416 (8)0.0141 (2)
O50.88490 (13)0.76472 (9)0.36706 (8)0.0148 (2)
O10.50750 (13)0.59279 (10)0.75438 (8)0.0168 (2)
O60.93192 (13)0.56691 (10)0.30278 (8)0.0173 (2)
O40.80491 (14)0.58662 (10)0.44532 (8)0.0207 (2)
O20.64974 (14)0.64786 (10)0.62512 (9)0.0205 (2)
N50.77821 (13)0.31443 (11)0.47214 (9)0.0099 (2)
H50.7873840.3989580.4586440.012*
N20.68341 (13)0.14353 (11)0.57534 (9)0.0105 (2)
H20.6342870.1187190.6292180.013*
N40.92308 (15)0.27225 (11)0.32949 (9)0.0128 (2)
H4A0.9296370.3581220.3214230.015*
H4B0.9671230.2189020.2868540.015*
N60.56691 (14)0.68070 (11)0.69851 (9)0.0115 (2)
N70.87310 (14)0.63926 (11)0.37153 (9)0.0116 (2)
N10.63901 (14)0.36592 (11)0.61695 (9)0.0130 (2)
H1A0.6498480.4504900.6043040.016*
H1B0.5886580.3402250.6700250.016*
N30.71841 (14)−0.08175 (11)0.53700 (9)0.0131 (2)
H3A0.666228−0.1005040.5909190.016*
H3B0.754039−0.1456930.4994730.016*
C10.69879 (15)0.27685 (13)0.55581 (10)0.0103 (3)
C40.84517 (15)0.22217 (13)0.40753 (10)0.0101 (3)
C30.82632 (16)0.08538 (12)0.42648 (10)0.0103 (3)
H30.8683410.0214840.3826320.012*
C20.74394 (15)0.04582 (13)0.51170 (10)0.0106 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O30.0184 (5)0.0101 (4)0.0138 (5)0.0018 (3)0.0028 (4)−0.0004 (3)
O50.0195 (5)0.0105 (5)0.0130 (5)−0.0005 (4)−0.0006 (4)0.0002 (3)
O10.0244 (5)0.0126 (5)0.0153 (5)−0.0007 (4)0.0088 (4)0.0021 (3)
O60.0254 (5)0.0144 (5)0.0140 (5)0.0018 (4)0.0088 (4)−0.0018 (4)
O40.0344 (6)0.0149 (5)0.0166 (5)−0.0011 (4)0.0142 (4)0.0018 (4)
O20.0328 (6)0.0141 (5)0.0189 (5)0.0008 (4)0.0163 (4)−0.0014 (4)
N50.0140 (5)0.0081 (5)0.0071 (5)−0.0002 (4)0.0005 (4)0.0004 (4)
N20.0133 (5)0.0113 (5)0.0068 (5)−0.0011 (4)0.0018 (4)0.0008 (4)
N40.0187 (5)0.0116 (5)0.0087 (5)0.0005 (4)0.0041 (4)0.0004 (4)
N60.0140 (5)0.0119 (5)0.0077 (5)0.0004 (4)−0.0001 (4)−0.0004 (4)
N70.0126 (5)0.0133 (5)0.0078 (5)0.0003 (4)−0.0014 (4)0.0004 (4)
N10.0181 (5)0.0106 (5)0.0106 (5)−0.0001 (4)0.0033 (4)0.0000 (4)
N30.0174 (5)0.0101 (5)0.0115 (5)−0.0005 (4)0.0020 (4)0.0011 (4)
C10.0095 (5)0.0127 (6)0.0071 (5)−0.0003 (4)−0.0026 (4)0.0002 (4)
C40.0103 (5)0.0125 (6)0.0056 (5)0.0000 (4)−0.0032 (4)−0.0006 (4)
C30.0122 (5)0.0107 (6)0.0072 (5)0.0009 (4)−0.0006 (4)−0.0015 (4)
C20.0095 (5)0.0118 (6)0.0082 (5)0.0000 (4)−0.0040 (4)−0.0008 (4)
O3—N61.2597 (14)N4—C41.3240 (17)
O5—N71.2496 (14)N4—H4A0.8600
O1—N61.2511 (15)N4—H4B0.8600
O6—N71.2577 (15)N1—C11.3010 (17)
O4—N71.2476 (15)N1—H1A0.8600
O2—N61.2473 (15)N1—H1B0.8600
N5—C11.3477 (16)N3—C21.3267 (16)
N5—C41.3767 (16)N3—H3A0.8600
N5—H50.8600N3—H3B0.8600
N2—C11.3531 (16)C4—C31.3888 (17)
N2—C21.3822 (16)C3—C21.3834 (18)
N2—H20.8600C3—H30.9300
C1—N5—C4122.26 (11)H1A—N1—H1B120.0
C1—N5—H5118.9C2—N3—H3A120.0
C4—N5—H5118.9C2—N3—H3B120.0
C1—N2—C2122.27 (11)H3A—N3—H3B120.0
C1—N2—H2118.9N1—C1—N5121.18 (12)
C2—N2—H2118.9N1—C1—N2120.53 (12)
C4—N4—H4A120.0N5—C1—N2118.28 (11)
C4—N4—H4B120.0N4—C4—N5116.31 (11)
H4A—N4—H4B120.0N4—C4—C3124.41 (12)
O2—N6—O1120.68 (11)N5—C4—C3119.28 (11)
O2—N6—O3118.54 (11)C2—C3—C4118.85 (12)
O1—N6—O3120.78 (11)C2—C3—H3120.6
O4—N7—O5119.59 (11)C4—C3—H3120.6
O4—N7—O6120.46 (11)N3—C2—N2117.00 (11)
O5—N7—O6119.94 (11)N3—C2—C3123.98 (12)
C1—N1—H1A120.0N2—C2—C3119.02 (11)
C1—N1—H1B120.0
C4—N5—C1—N1178.85 (11)N4—C4—C3—C2179.23 (12)
C4—N5—C1—N2−0.76 (17)N5—C4—C3—C2−1.46 (17)
C2—N2—C1—N1179.46 (11)C1—N2—C2—N3−178.59 (10)
C2—N2—C1—N5−0.93 (17)C1—N2—C2—C31.36 (17)
C1—N5—C4—N4−178.68 (11)C4—C3—C2—N3179.81 (11)
C1—N5—C4—C31.96 (17)C4—C3—C2—N2−0.13 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5···O40.861.882.7321 (15)174
N2—H2···O1i0.861.982.8319 (15)169
N4—H4A···O60.862.082.9428 (15)177
N4—H4B···O5ii0.862.433.0706 (16)131
N4—H4B···O6ii0.862.112.9593 (15)172
N4—H4B···N7ii0.862.623.4400 (16)160
N1—H1A···O20.861.972.7986 (15)160
N1—H1A···N60.862.693.3577 (16)135
N1—H1B···O3i0.861.942.7912 (15)172
N3—H3A···O3iii0.862.163.0018 (14)167
N3—H3A···O2iii0.862.542.9770 (15)113
N3—H3B···O5iii0.862.263.0619 (15)156
C3—H3···O5iii0.932.563.3134 (16)139
  21 in total

1.  Myeloperoxidase generates 5-chlorouracil in human atherosclerotic tissue: a potential pathway for somatic mutagenesis by macrophages.

Authors:  Junko Takeshita; Jaeman Byun; Thomas Q Nhan; David K Pritchard; Subramaniam Pennathur; Steven M Schwartz; Alan Chait; Jay W Heinecke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Synthesis and photophysical investigation of a series of push-pull arylvinyldiazine chromophores.

Authors:  Sylvain Achelle; Alberto Barsella; Christine Baudequin; Bertrand Caro; Françoise Robin-le Guen
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 4.354

4.  The effects of 2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine (TAP) on sodium and potassium excretion by the rat kidney: comparison with amiloride.

Authors:  R H Bowman; J Arnow; I M Weiner
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Porosity Prediction through Hydrogen Bonding in Covalent Organic Frameworks.

Authors:  Suvendu Karak; Sushil Kumar; Pradip Pachfule; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Colorimetric Metal Sensing of Fe3+ and Cr3+ and Photophysical and Electrochemical Studies Based on Benzo[4,5]thiazolo[3,2-a]pyrimidine-3-carboxylate and Its Derivatives.

Authors:  Shanthi Seenan; Sathiyanarayanan Kulathu Iyer
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Triaminopyrimidine is a fast-killing and long-acting antimalarial clinical candidate.

Authors:  Shahul Hameed P; Suresh Solapure; Vikas Patil; Philipp P Henrich; Pamela A Magistrado; Sowmya Bharath; Kannan Murugan; Pavithra Viswanath; Jayashree Puttur; Abhishek Srivastava; Eknath Bellale; Vijender Panduga; Gajanan Shanbag; Disha Awasthy; Sudhir Landge; Sapna Morayya; Krishna Koushik; Ramanatha Saralaya; Anandkumar Raichurkar; Nikhil Rautela; Nilanjana Roy Choudhury; Anisha Ambady; Radha Nandishaiah; Jitendar Reddy; K R Prabhakar; Sreenivasaiah Menasinakai; Suresh Rudrapatna; Monalisa Chatterji; María Belén Jiménez-Díaz; María Santos Martínez; Laura María Sanz; Olivia Coburn-Flynn; David A Fidock; Amanda K Lukens; Dyann F Wirth; Balachandra Bandodkar; Kakoli Mukherjee; Robert E McLaughlin; David Waterson; Lyn Rosenbrier-Ribeiro; Kevin Hickling; V Balasubramanian; Peter Warner; Vinayak Hosagrahara; Adam Dudley; Pravin S Iyer; Shridhar Narayanan; Stefan Kavanagh; Vasan K Sambandamurthy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

9.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.