| Literature DB >> 36071942 |
Ying Chen1,2, Rong Zhang3, Jialiang Xu1,2, Qing Ren1,2.
Abstract
Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) has a long history of treating gastrointestinal ailments in China; however, little is known about the functional mechanism driving its therapeutic effects. The primary edible form of millet is porridge. This study investigates the effects of millet porridge on diphenoxylate-induced constipation and intestinal microflora in mice. Fifty mice were randomly divided into five groups: normal control group, constipation model group, and low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose millet porridge groups. After 14 days of millet porridge gavage, constipation was induced and measured. The results showed that millet porridge prevented constipation by increasing the water content of feces, shortened the time of the first melena defecation, promoted gastric emptying, and improved the rate of gastrointestinal propulsion. Millet porridge also dose-dependently increased levels of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus and decreased levels of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus, and Bacteroides in the intestine. These results show that millet porridge could accelerate intestinal motility and change the proportions of intestinal flora and that it has a potent prebiotic effect.Entities:
Keywords: constipation; foxtail millet; gastrointestinal motility; intestinal microflora; prebiotic
Year: 2022 PMID: 36071942 PMCID: PMC9442030 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.965687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
The nutritional content of millet porridge.
| Composition | Crude fat | Protein | Ash | Moisture | Carbohydrates | Crude fiber | Amylose | Amylopectin |
| Content (%) | 3.74 ± 0.68 | 10.3 ± 0.52 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 6.56 ± 0.10 | 78.50 ± 1.11 | 11.23 ± 0.38 | 23.86 ± 1.02 | 76.14 ± 1.02 |
Effects on the first defecation time, weight, and water content of feces in normal and constipated mice.
| Group | Millet porridge dose (g/kg body weight per day) | First defecation time (min) | Feces weight (mg) | Feces water content (%) | |
| Normal | Control | 0 | 94 ± 12 | 200 ± 12 | 47.50 ± 2.5 |
| High | 12 | 62 ± 22 | 270 ± 12 | 48.21 ± 2.3 | |
| Middle | 6 | 63 ± 18 | 250 ± 12 | 44.78 ± 3.5 | |
| Low | 3 | 87 ± 12 | 230 ± 15 | 45.93 ± 3.3 | |
| Constipated | Control | 0 | 84 ± 11 | 380 ± 15 | 45.22 ± 2.8 |
| Model | 0 | 129 ± 22 | 230 ± 12 | 35.42 ± 2.4 | |
| High | 12 | 110 ± 10 | 370 ± 14 | 43.51 ± 2.3 | |
| Middle | 6 | 118 ± 21 | 370 ± 16 | 42.16 ± 2.1 | |
| Low | 3 | 122 ± 12 | 320 ± 12 | 45.31 ± 3.4 |
Means that different letters in the same column indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05) between them.
FIGURE 1Body weight of mice. The data are means ± SD. Male Kunming mice were gavaged with millet porridge (3, 6, 12 g/kg body weight each day in the low-, middle-, and high-dose group, respectively) for 28 days, then free-fed for another 7 days.
FIGURE 2The amount of intestinal bacteria. (A) Bifidobacterium; (B) Lactobacillus; (C) E. coli; (D) Enterococcus; (E) Bacteroides. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 10 for each group). *P < 0.05, and **P < 0.01 represent a significant difference from the control group.
FIGURE 3(A) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles from bacteria of fresh mice feces. (B) Cluster analysis analyzing Dice similarity index of DGGE profiles. 1 was treated with control; 2 was treated with 12 g/kg millet porridge; 3 was treated with 6 g/kg millet porridge; and 4 was treated with 3 g/kg millet porridge.