| Literature DB >> 36071941 |
Yan Dai1,2, Ruoting Yang1,2, Yuting Yan1,2, Yong Wu1,3,4, Xuanyi Meng1,3,4, Anshu Yang1,3,4, Zhihua Wu1,3,4, Linbo Shi5, Xin Li1,2,4, Hongbing Chen1,3,4.
Abstract
The current research on interaction between catechin and protein has focused on non-covalent crosslinking, however, the mechanism of free radical-induced crosslinking between catechin and β-lactoglobulin (BLG) is not known. In this study, BLG bound to four catechins [epicatechin (EC), epigallocatechin (EGC), epicatechin gallate (ECG), and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)]. The structure change of complex was investigated by circular dichroism spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy and Acid and 8-Anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) fluorescence spectroscopy. M cell model was constructed to evaluate the transintestinal epithelial transport capacity of complex digestive products. The results showed that catechins were covalently bound to BLG by C-S and C-N bonds and their binding content was EGCG>EGC>ECG>EC. Moreover, catechins could change the secondary structure of BLG, with the decrease of α-helix and reduction of the irregular coilings, which leads to the loose spatial structure of the protein. Moreover, the catechin could enhance further the digestibility of BLG. Transport capacity of digestive products of M cell model was about twice of that of the Caco-2 cell model, indicating that M cell model had better antigen transport capacity. The difference between groups indicated that the transport efficiency of digestive products was decreased with the presence of catechin, in which BLG-EGCG and BLG-EGC groups were transported more strong than those of BLG-EC and BLG-ECG groups. The transport efficiency of BLG-catechin complexes were lower than that of BLG, indicating that catechin had the protective and repair roles on intestinal barrier permeability.Entities:
Keywords: catechins; crosslinking mechanism; digestive ability; free radical crosslinking; transport capacity; β-lactoglobulin
Year: 2022 PMID: 36071941 PMCID: PMC9441877 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.955135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of BLG-catechin complexes (M: Marker; Lane 1: BLG; Lane 2: BLG-EC; Lane 3: BLG-ECG; Lane 4: BLG-EGC; Lane 5: BLG-EGCG).
Total phenolic content of BLG and BLG-catechin complexes.
| Sample | Total phenol binding equivalent (mg/mL) |
| BLG-control | – |
| BLG-EC | 28.710 ± 0.41 |
| BLG-ECG | 42.075 ± 0.92 |
| BLG-EGC | 42.372 ± 0.53 |
| BLG-EGCG | 45.155 ± 1.37 |
Different superscript letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
Total free amino, total sulfhydryl groups, tryptophan and tyrosine groups content of BLG-catechin complexes.
| Sample | The content of free amino (nmol/mg) | The content of total sulfhydryl groups (nmol/mg) | The content of total tryptophan groups (ng/mg) | The content of tyrosine groups (ng/mg) |
| BLG-control | 743.31 ± 6.6 | 29.83 ± 0.26 | 131.84 ± 11.78 | 438.47 ± 9.79 |
| BLG-EC | 657.31 ± 6.62 | 21.53 ± 0.09 | 231.14 ± 19.09 | 409.37 ± 20.84 |
| BLG-ECG | 715.05 ± 4.41 | 20.72 ± 0.06 | 469.41 ± 19.19 | 400.11 ± 14.35 |
| BLG-EGC | 648.88 ± 2.21 | 18.15 ± 0.2 | 117.38 ± 11.17 | 426.57 ± 12.39 |
| BLG-EGCG | 649.51 ± 11.03 | 14.4 ± 0.09 | 240.93 ± 17.00 | 436.49 ± 15.50 |
Different superscript letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Spectrum change of BLG after binding to catechin panel (A) represented the Far-UV circular dichroic spectra of BLG-catechin complexes; panel (B) represented UV-Vis spectra of BLG-catechin complexes; panel (C) represented Acid and 8-Anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) fluorescence spectra of BLG-catechin complexes.
Secondary structure contents of BLG-catechin complexes.
| Sample | α -Helix | β -Sheet | β -Turns | Unordered |
| BLG | 24.5 | 29.5 | 20.5 | 25.5 |
| BLG-EC | 19.9 | 29.7 | 21.9 | 28.4 |
| BLG-ECG | 22.0 | 28.8 | 21.5 | 27.8 |
| BLG-EGC | 21.2 | 28.0 | 22.3 | 28.4 |
| BLG-EGCG | 20.5 | 29.1 | 22.0 | 28.3 |
FIGURE 3Tricine-SDS-PAGE protein profiles of BLG-catechin complexes digested in simulated gastric fluid and gastrointestinal fluid of adult. (A–E) Tricine-SDS-PAGE protein profiles of BLG-catechin complexes digested in simulated gastric of adult. (a–e) Tricine-SDS-PAGE protein profiles of BLG-catechin complexes digested in the intestinal fluid of adult. G: pepsin; P: trypsin; M: marker; lane 3: BLG and its complexes (BLG represents the product of gastric digestion for 60 min); lane 4–7: digestion of 0, 5, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 120 min.
FIGURE 4Transepithelial electrical resistance of Caco-2 monolayer model and M cell model. (A) Transepithelial electrical resistance of Caco-2 monolayer model; (B) transepithelial electrical resistance of M cell model.
FIGURE 5Transport efficiency of digestion of Caco-2 monolayer model and M cell model. (A) Caco-2 monolayer model; (B) M cell model. Different superscript letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05).