| Literature DB >> 36071890 |
Meity Ardiana1,2, Eka Utami1,2, Budi Pikir1,2, Anwar Santoso3,4.
Abstract
Background: Smoking is one of the top three causes of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Natural antioxidants including black cumin ( Nigella sativa) may inhibit the pathogenesis of initial process of atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of black cumin (Nigella sativa) in preventing endothelial dysfunction mainly through macrophage M1/M2 inflammatory response in cigarette smoked male Wistars.Entities:
Keywords: Endothelial dysfunction; Nigella sativa; black cumin; cigarette smoke; macrophage.
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 36071890 PMCID: PMC9403357 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.53713.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: F1000Res ISSN: 2046-1402
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of study protocol.
Figure 2. Illustration of smoking chamber for rats.
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining of M1 expression by CD38 (white arrow) on (A) Negative control (B) Positive control.
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical staining of M2 expression by Egr-2 (white arrow) on (A) Negative control (B) Positive control.
M1 count in K− & K+ groups.
| Group | M1 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Min-Max | ||
| K− | 1.00 a | 0.50-1.50 | < 0.05* |
| K+ | 25.00 b | 15.00-54.00 | |
Note: * significant if α = 0.05 ( Mann-Whitney test).
superscript shows difference between group.
M2 count in K− & K+ groups.
| Groups | M2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Min-Max | ||
| K− | 1.98 ± 1.18 a | 0.50-3.50 | < 0.05* |
| K+ | 7.17 ± 3.36 b | 3.00-14.00 | |
Note: * significant if α = 0.05 ( Independent t-test).
superscript shows difference between group.
Summary of M1/ M2 ratios for K− and K+ groups.
| Group | M1/M2 ratio | Dominance |
|---|---|---|
| K− | 0.9 7 ± 0.9 8 | M2 |
| K+ | 4.97 ± 3.42 | M1 |
M1 / M2 ratio in K− and K+ groups.
| Groups | n | M1 / M2 Ratio | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Min-Max | |||
| K− | 9 | 0.5 a | 0.25-3.00 | < 0.05* |
| K+ | 9 | 3.75 b | 2.63-13.33 | |
Note: * significant if α = 0.05 ( Mann-Whitney test).
superscript shows difference between group.
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical staining of M1 expression by CD38 (white arrow) on (C) P1 (D) P2 ( E) P3.
Figure 6. Immunohistochemical staining of M2 expression by Egr-2 (white arrow) at (C) P1 (D) P2 ( E) P3.
Figure 7. Graph of the mean value of the M1 count after giving black cumin extract.
Figure 8. Graph of the median of M2 after giving black cumin extract.
Summary of M1 / M2 ratio in K (+), P1, P2 and P3.
| Groups | M1/M2 Ratio | Dominance |
|---|---|---|
|
| 4.97 ± 3.42 | M1 |
|
| 9.05 ± 5.76 | M1 |
|
| 0.42 ± 0.28 | M2 |
|
| 6.22 ± 3.61 | M1 |
M1 / M2 ratio in K(+), P1, P2 dan P3.
| Groups | Ratio M1 / M2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Min-Max | ||
| K(+) | 3.75 a | 2.63-13.33 | < 0.05* |
| P1 | 8.33 b | 3.80-21.50 | |
| P2 | 0.38 c | 0.13-1.12 | |
| P3 | 6.00 ab | 1.21-11.75 | |
Note: * significant if α = 0,05 ( Kruskal-Wallis test).
superscript shows difference between groups ( Mann-Whitney test).
Figure 9. Graph of the median value of the M1/ M2 ratio after giving black cumin extract.