| Literature DB >> 36071883 |
Azizah Othman1,2, Mohd Sufian Ardi Abdul Ghani1, Fahisham Taib1,2, Norsarwany Mohamad1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: Thalassemia is a chronic childhood disease that could result in psychological distress not only to the patients but also to their caretakers. Caretakers utilize different coping strategies to reduce stress and maintain a good quality of life. Objective: The study aims to measure the level of psychological distress among caretakers of transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients and identify coping strategies used by them, as well as examine factors related to both outcome measures.Entities:
Keywords: caretakers; children; chronic illness; coping; psychological distress; thalassemia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36071883 PMCID: PMC9441789 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.941202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.569
The DASS 21 recommended cut-off points (7).
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | 0–9 | 0–7 | 0–14 |
| Normal | 10–13 | 8–9 | 15–18 |
| Moderate | 14–20 | 10–14 | 19–25 |
| Severe | 21–27 | 15–19 | 26–33 |
| Extremely Severe | 28+ | 20+ | 34+ |
Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (N = 68).
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| |
| Hospital USM | 14 (20.6) |
|
| |
| Young adult (Age ranges: 20–39) | 24 (35.3) |
|
| |
| Male | 30 (44.1) |
|
| |
| Malay | 67 (98.5) |
|
| |
| One only | 54 (79.4) |
|
| |
| Employed | 41 (60.3) |
|
| |
| Low [B40] | 21 (30.9) |
|
| |
| Tertiary | 15 (22.1) |
The frequency and percentage of participants reported experiencing normal, mild, moderate, and severe levels of depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms based on DASS 21 (N = 68).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Depression | 64 (94.1) | 2 (2.9) | 2 (2.9) | – |
| Anxiety | 63 (92.6) | 1 (1.5) | 3 (4.4) | 1 (1.5) |
| Stress | 68 (100) | – | – | – |
The mean and standard deviation (SD) or the median and interquartile range (IQR) for each type of coping strategy utilized by the participants as reported in Brief–COPE (N = 68).
|
| |
|---|---|
| Religion | 7.00 (2.00)∧ |
| Acceptance | 6.00 (3.00)∧ |
| Positive reframing | 5.81 (1.80) |
| Active coping | 5.49 (1.82) |
| Planning | 5.25 (1.69) |
| Use of instrumental support | 4.87 (1.62) |
| Use of emotional support | 4.56 (1.54) |
| Self– distraction | 4.53 (1.69) |
| Venting | 4.18 (1.64) |
| Humor | 3.94 (1.35) |
| Denial | 3.29 (1.52) |
| Substance use | 2.00 (0.00)∧ |
| Self– blame | 2.00 (2.00)∧ |
| Behavior disengagement | 2.00 (1.00)∧ |
∧ Median (IQR) due to skewed data.
The median and Interquartile Range (IQR) scores of different coping strategies utilized by participants who reported normal psychological functioning compared to those who reported having depressive and anxiety symptoms.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Substance use | 2.00 (0.00) | 4.50 (3.00) | <0.01* | 4.00 (4.00) | <0.01* |
| Denial | 3.00 (2.00) | 5.50 (3.00) | 0.06 | 5.50 (3.00) | 0.02* |
| Behavior disengagement | 2.00 (0.00) | 3.00 (4.00) | 0.14 | 4.00 (3.00) | 0.03* |
| Self–distraction | 5.00 (3.00) | 0.50 (3.00) | 0.13 | 3.00 (3.00) | 0.13 |
| Active coping | 6.00 (3.00) | 4.50 (2.00) | 0.31 | 5.00 (2.00) | 0.40 |
| Emotional support | 4.56 (1.56)∧ | 4.50 (1.29)∧ | 0.94 | 4.50 (1.29)∧ | 0.94 |
| Instrumental support | 5.00 (2.00) | 6.00 (2.00) | 0.47 | 6.00 (2.00) | 0.50 |
| Venting | 4.17 (1.65)∧ | 4.25 (1.71)∧ | 0.93 | 5.00(3.00)∧ | 0.45 |
| Positive reframing | 6.00 (2.00) | 6.00 (2.00) | 0.43 | 6.00 (3.00) | 0.18 |
| Planning | 5.28 (1.71)∧ | 4.75 (1.26)∧ | 0.55 | 5.00 (2.00)∧ | 0.72 |
| Humor | 4.00 (2.00) | 4.50 (2.00) | 0.22 | 4.00 (2.00) | 0.28 |
| Acceptance | 6.00 (3.00) | 6.00 (2.00) | 0.59 | 6.00 (1.00) | 0.54 |
| Religion | 7.00 (2.00) | 6.50 (4.00) | 0.45 | 6.00 (3.00) | 0.29 |
| Self–blame | 2.00 (2.00) | 4.00 (4.00) | 0.15 | 4.00 (3.00) | 0.07 |
∧Mean (SD) for normally distributed data.
*p < 0.05.
Factors associated with the use of positive reframing as a coping strategy by the simple and multiple logistic regression model.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Young adult | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Middle age | −1.48 | 0.23 (0.06,0.87) | 0.03 | −1.48 | 0.23 (0.06,0.87) | 0.03 |
|
| ||||||
| Male | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Female | 2.61 | 13.54(1.43, 128.25) | 0.02 | 2.61 | 13.54(1.43, 128.25) | 0.02 |
|
| ||||||
| Tertiary | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Secondary and below | −2.25 | 0.11(0.01,0.89) | 0.04 | −2.52 | 0.08(0.01,0.79) | 0.03 |
|
| ||||||
| Employed | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Unemployed | −2.38 | 0.09 (0.01, 0.84) | 0.03 | −2.38 | 0.09 (0.01, 0.84) | 0.03 |
ªBackward LR Multiple Logistic Regression model was applied, Multicollinearity and interaction terms were checked and not found, Hosmer–Lemeshow test, (p = 1.00), classification table (overall correctly classified percentage = 75%), and area under the ROC curve (20%) were applied to check the model fitness.