Literature DB >> 3607146

Stimulus selection during auditory spatial attention as expressed by event-related potentials.

K Alho, N Donauer, P Paavilainen, K Reinikainen, M Sams, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

Selective listening to stimuli with certain physical features, such as pitch or location, is reflected by an event-related brain-potential (ERP) component called the processing negativity (PN). PN may reflect a matching or comparison process between the sensory inflow and the hypothesized 'attentional trace'. The latter is an actively formed and maintained neuronal representation of the physical features defining the relevant stimulus. According to this matching theory of selective attention, the better the sensory input corresponds to the attentional trace the longer the stimulus is processes (as reflected by a larger and longer PN). This theory is supported by the experiment in which the relevant and irrelevant stimuli were separated from one another in pitch. It was found that even the irrelevant stimuli elicited PN, and further that this PN was larger the smaller the pitch separation between the eliciting stimuli and the relevant stimuli. The largest PN was elicited by the relevant stimuli. The present study finds analogous results when the relevant and irrelevant stimuli are separated in spatial origin rather than in pitch.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3607146     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(87)90022-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  10 in total

Review 1.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Dynamics of cortical responses to tone pairs in relation to task difficulty: a MEG study.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Hanna Renvall; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

4.  Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing.

Authors:  Lori B Astheimer; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Impaired Facilitatory Mechanisms of Auditory Attention After Damage of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Kelly G Buchanan; Humsini Viswanath; Jessica Black; Donatella Scabini; Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Attentional functions in listening and schizophrenia. A selective review.

Authors:  G Heim
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1989

7.  Signal clustering modulates auditory cortical activity in humans.

Authors:  C Alain; D L Woods
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

8.  Auditory attentional control and selection during cocktail party listening.

Authors:  Kevin T Hill; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Disentangling gaze shifts from preparatory ERP effects during spatial attention.

Authors:  Steffan Kennett; José van Velzen; Martin Eimer; Jon Driver
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Electrophysiological measures of attention during speech perception predict metalinguistic skills in children.

Authors:  Lori Astheimer; Monika Janus; Sylvain Moreno; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 6.464

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.