| Literature DB >> 36071390 |
Arif Sabta Aji1,2, Nur Indrawaty Lipoeto3, Yusrawati Yusrawati4, Safarina G Malik5, Nur Aini Kusmayanti6, Isman Susanto2, Siti Nurunniyah2,7, Ratih Devi Alfiana6, Wahyuningsih Wahyuningsih2,8, Nur Mukhlishoh Majidah2, Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our objectives were to investigate the relationship between maternal vitamin D status and IGF-1 levels in healthy Minangkabau pregnant mothers and their impact on newborn anthropometry outcomes and to examine whether this relationship was modified by dietary intake using a nutrigenetic approach.Entities:
Keywords: Birth length; Carbohydrate intake; Genetic risk score; IGF-1; Newborn anthropometry; Vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36071390 PMCID: PMC9450237 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05020-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ISSN: 1471-2393 Impact factor: 3.105
Characteristics of study subjects based on T3 vitamin D status
| Variables | ‘Deficiency-insufficiency’ VD status ( | ‘Sufficiency’ VD status ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 28.92 (5.07) | 30.28 (6.12) | 0.101 |
| Maternal age group | |||
| a. ≤ 20 | 1 | 5.8 | |
| b. 21–30 | 60.2 | 43.0 | |
| c. > 30 | 38.8 | 51.2 | |
| Education | 0.255 | ||
| a. Primary | 23.5 | 31.4 | |
| b. Secondary | 38.8 | 41.9 | |
| c. Tertiary | 37.8 | 26.7 | |
| Sun exposure status per day | 0.721 | ||
| a. < 1 h | 52.6 | 48.8 | |
| b. ≥ 1 h | 47.4 | 51.2 | |
| Pre-conception body weight, kg | 54.56 (11.21) | 55.71 (10.15) | 0.469 |
| Height, cm | 154.73 (5.79) | 153.85 (6.65) | 0.341 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m2 | 23.12 (4.46) | 23.61 (4.35) | 0.457 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI status | 0.361 | ||
| a. < 25 kg/m2 | 72.4 | 65.1 | |
| b. ≥ 25 kg/m2 | 27.6 | 34.9 | |
| Gestational age at birth, weeks | 39.08 (1.81) | 38.73 (1.94) | 0.211 |
| Infant gender | |||
| a. Boy | 51 | 60.5 | |
| b. Girl | 49 | 39.5 | |
| Birthweight, g | 3147.09 (458.73) | 3244.90 (469.51) | 0.156 |
| Birth length, cm | 48.53 (2.05) | 48.59 (3.43) | 0.893 |
| Head circumference, cm | 33.55 (1.89) | 34.10 (2.97) | 0.139 |
| Biochemical Measurements | |||
| IGF-1, ng/mL | 20.74 (12.89) | 32.21 (1.89) | |
| Changes in 25(OH)D, ng/mL | 1.52 (6.17) | 14.12 (8.40) | |
Data are presented as percentages (%) for categorical data variables and mean and standard deviation [mean (SD)] for numeric data variables. Indicators of vitamin D status during pregnancy are based on the Institute of Medicine (IOM); sufficient (≥ 20 ng/mL), insufficient (12–19.00 ng/mL) and deficient (< 12 ng/mL). Changes in 25(OH)D levels during pregnancy are defined by 25(OH)D T3 – 25(OH)D T1
IGF-1 Insulin-like growth factor 1, 25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D, T1 First trimester, T3 Third trimester, BMI Body mass index
Association between GRS and serum 25(OH)D levels during T3 of pregnancy
| | 110 | 0.08 | 1.31 (0.02) | 0.08 | 1.31 (0.02) | ||
| | 73 | 1.23 (0.02) | 1.23 (0.02) | ||||
| | 102 | 0.04 | 1.30 (0.02) | 0.241 | 0.03 | 1.29 (0.02) | 0.334 |
| | 79 | 1.26 (0.02) | 1.26 (0.02) | ||||
| | 124 | 0.09 | 1.30. (0.02) | 0.10 | 1.31 (0.02) | ||
| | 54 | 1.213 (0.03) | 1.21 (0.03) | ||||
Data are presented as mean and standard error [mean (SE)]
25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D, SE Standard error, VDR Vitamin D receptor, GRS Genetic risk score
‡P values obtained from linear regression analysis with the crude model
†P values obtained from linear regression analysis adjusted for age, pre-pregnancy BMI, sun exposure status, vitamin D supplement and geographical status
aThe analysis was performed on log-transformed variables
*All six SNPs in genes are involved in the synthesis and metabolism of vitamin D
**Two SNPs in VDR genes are included in the ‘VDR-GRS score’
***Four SNPs in the DHCR7, GC, CYP24A1 and CYP2R1 genes are included in the ‘Non-VDR GRS score’
Fig. 1Interaction between the VDR-GRS and dietary carbohydrate intake (g) on birth length (cm) (P = 0.032). Mothers who were in the highest tertile of carbohydrate intake and carried ≥ 2 risk alleles gave birth to babies with significantly lower birth length (p = 0.008)
Interaction between GRSs and T3 dietary intake on newborn anthropometry outcomes
| | 110 | 3197.46 | 40.90 | 0.611a 0.872b 0.524c | 48.75 | 0.19 | 0.065a 0.073b 0.300c | 33.97 | 0.18 | 0.982a 0.364b 0.227c |
| | 73 | 3233.58 | 50.84 | 48.70 | 0.23 | 33.93 | 0.23 | |||
| | 102 | 3188.11 | 43.30 | 0.810a 0.775b 0.556c | 48.80 | 0.19 | 0.099b 0.447c | 34.01 | 0.19 | 0.970a 0.701b 0.571c |
| | 79 | 3229.51 | 50.48 | 48.65 | 0.23 | 33.83 | 0.22 | |||
| | 124 | 3250.11 | 38.82 | 0.841a 0.795b 0.710c | 48.79 | 0.18 | 0.256a 0.079b 0.278c | 34.06 | 0.17 | 0.835a 0.230b 0.168c |
| | 55 | 3148.72 | 60.40 | 48.56 | 0.28 | 33.80 | 0.26 | |||
IGF-1 Insulin-like growth factor 1, PAL Physical activity level, T3 Third trimester
Adjusted for age, total energy intake in T3, pre-pregnancy BMI and vitamin D
aInteraction between GRS and dietary carbohydrate intake
binteraction between GRS and dietary protein intake
cInteraction between GRS and dietary fat intake
*All six SNPs in genes involved in the synthesis and metabolism of vitamin D (vitamin D-GRS);
**Two SNPs in VDR genes are included in the ‘VDR-GRS’;
***Four SNPs in DHCR7, GC, CYP24A1 and CYP2R1 genes are included in the ‘Non-VDR GRS score’