Literature DB >> 36071221

Cerebral blood flow, amyloid burden, and cognition in cognitively normal individuals.

Jarith L Ebenau1, Denise Visser2, Sander C J Verfaillie2, Tessa Timmers2, Mardou S S A van Leeuwenstijn3, Mara Ten Kate2, Albert D Windhorst2, Frederik Barkhof2,4, Philip Scheltens3, Niels D Prins3,5, Ronald Boellaard2, Wiesje M van der Flier3,6, Bart N M van Berckel2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The role of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease is complex and largely unknown. We investigated cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between CBF, amyloid burden, and cognition, in cognitively normal individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD).
METHODS: We included 187 cognitively normal individuals with SCD from the SCIENCe project (65 ± 8 years, 39% F, MMSE 29 ± 1). Each underwent a dynamic (0-70 min) [18F]florbetapir PET and T1-weighted MRI scan, enabling calculation of mean binding potential (BPND; specific amyloid binding) and R1 (measure of relative (r)CBF). Eighty-three individuals underwent a second [18F]florbetapir PET (2.6 ± 0.7 years). Participants annually underwent neuropsychological assessment (follow-up time 3.8 ± 3.1 years; number of observations n = 774).
RESULTS: A low baseline R1 was associated with steeper decline on tests addressing memory, attention, and global cognition (range betas 0.01 to 0.27, p < 0.05). High BPND was associated with steeper decline on tests covering all domains (range betas - 0.004 to - 0.70, p < 0.05). When both predictors were simultaneously added to the model, associations remained essentially unchanged. Additionally, we found longitudinal associations between R1 and BPND. High baseline BPND predicted decline over time in R1 (all regions, range betasBP×time - 0.09 to - 0.14, p < 0.05). Vice versa, low baseline R1 predicted increase in BPND in frontal, temporal, and composite ROIs over time (range betasR1×time - 0.03 to - 0.08, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that amyloid accumulation and decrease in rCBF are two parallel disease processes without a fixed order, both providing unique predictive information for cognitive decline and each process enhancing the other longitudinally.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid; Cerebral blood flow; PET; R 1

Year:  2022        PMID: 36071221     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05958-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   10.057


  27 in total

1.  Cerebral Blood Flow Is Associated with Diagnostic Class and Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Wenna Duan; Parshant Sehrawat; Arvind Balachandrasekaran; Ashish B Bhumkar; Paresh B Boraste; James T Becker; Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; H Michael Gach; Weiying Dai
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 2.  Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and other disorders.

Authors:  Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Regional cerebral blood flow estimated by early PiB uptake is reduced in mild cognitive impairment and associated with age in an amyloid-dependent manner.

Authors:  Anton F Gietl; Geoffrey Warnock; Florian Riese; Andrea M Kälin; Antje Saake; Esmeralda Gruber; Sandra E Leh; Paul G Unschuld; Felix P Kuhn; Cyrill Burger; Linjing Mu; Burkhardt Seifert; Roger M Nitsch; Roger Schibli; Simon M Ametamey; Alfred Buck; Christoph Hock
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Increased cerebral blood flow with increased amyloid burden in the preclinical phase of alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Amir Fazlollahi; Fernando Calamante; Xiaoyun Liang; Pierrick Bourgeat; Parnesh Raniga; Vincent Dore; Jurgen Fripp; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe; Alan Connelly; Victor L Villemagne; Olivier Salvado
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Willemijn J Jansen; Rik Ossenkoppele; Dirk L Knol; Betty M Tijms; Philip Scheltens; Frans R J Verhey; Pieter Jelle Visser; Pauline Aalten; Dag Aarsland; Daniel Alcolea; Myriam Alexander; Ina S Almdahl; Steven E Arnold; Inês Baldeiras; Henryk Barthel; Bart N M van Berckel; Kristen Bibeau; Kaj Blennow; David J Brooks; Mark A van Buchem; Vincent Camus; Enrica Cavedo; Kewei Chen; Gael Chetelat; Ann D Cohen; Alexander Drzezga; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Anne M Fagan; Tormod Fladby; Adam S Fleisher; Wiesje M van der Flier; Lisa Ford; Stefan Förster; Juan Fortea; Nadia Foskett; Kristian S Frederiksen; Yvonne Freund-Levi; Giovanni B Frisoni; Lutz Froelich; Tomasz Gabryelewicz; Kiran Dip Gill; Olymbia Gkatzima; Estrella Gómez-Tortosa; Mark Forrest Gordon; Timo Grimmer; Harald Hampel; Lucrezia Hausner; Sabine Hellwig; Sanna-Kaisa Herukka; Helmut Hildebrandt; Lianna Ishihara; Adrian Ivanoiu; William J Jagust; Peter Johannsen; Ramesh Kandimalla; Elisabeth Kapaki; Aleksandra Klimkowicz-Mrowiec; William E Klunk; Sebastian Köhler; Norman Koglin; Johannes Kornhuber; Milica G Kramberger; Koen Van Laere; Susan M Landau; Dong Young Lee; Mony de Leon; Viviana Lisetti; Alberto Lleó; Karine Madsen; Wolfgang Maier; Jan Marcusson; Niklas Mattsson; Alexandre de Mendonça; Olga Meulenbroek; Philipp T Meyer; Mark A Mintun; Vincent Mok; José Luis Molinuevo; Hanne M Møllergård; John C Morris; Barbara Mroczko; Stefan Van der Mussele; Duk L Na; Andrew Newberg; Agneta Nordberg; Arto Nordlund; Gerald P Novak; George P Paraskevas; Lucilla Parnetti; Gayan Perera; Oliver Peters; Julius Popp; Sudesh Prabhakar; Gil D Rabinovici; Inez H G B Ramakers; Lorena Rami; Catarina Resende de Oliveira; Juha O Rinne; Karen M Rodrigue; Eloy Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Catherine M Roe; Uros Rot; Christopher C Rowe; Eckart Rüther; Osama Sabri; Páscual Sanchez-Juan; Isabel Santana; Marie Sarazin; Johannes Schröder; Christin Schütte; Sang W Seo; Femke Soetewey; Hilkka Soininen; Luiza Spiru; Hanne Struyfs; Charlotte E Teunissen; Magda Tsolaki; Rik Vandenberghe; Marcel M Verbeek; Victor L Villemagne; Stephanie J B Vos; Linda J C van Waalwijk van Doorn; Gunhild Waldemar; Anders Wallin; Åsa K Wallin; Jens Wiltfang; David A Wolk; Marzena Zboch; Henrik Zetterberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Voxel-level comparison of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI and FDG-PET in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Y Chen; D A Wolk; J S Reddin; M Korczykowski; P M Martinez; E S Musiek; A B Newberg; P Julin; S E Arnold; J H Greenberg; J A Detre
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Reduced Cerebral Blood Flow in Mild Cognitive Impairment Assessed Using Phase-Contrast MRI.

Authors:  Reyes García de Eulate; Irene Goñi; Alvaro Galiano; Marta Vidorreta; Miriam Recio; Mario Riverol; José L Zubieta; María A Fernández-Seara
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 8.  Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Fangda Leng; Paul Edison
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Cerebral Blood Flow and Amyloid-β Interact to Affect Memory Performance in Cognitively Normal Older Adults.

Authors:  Katherine J Bangen; Alexandra L Clark; Emily C Edmonds; Nicole D Evangelista; Madeleine L Werhane; Kelsey R Thomas; Lyzette E Locano; My Tran; Zvinka Z Zlatar; Daniel A Nation; Mark W Bondi; Lisa Delano-Wood
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 10.  NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Billy Dunn; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; David M Holtzman; William Jagust; Frank Jessen; Jason Karlawish; Enchi Liu; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Thomas Montine; Creighton Phelps; Katherine P Rankin; Christopher C Rowe; Philip Scheltens; Eric Siemers; Heather M Snyder; Reisa Sperling
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 21.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.