Literature DB >> 36071112

ABCB1 variants and sex affect serotonin transporter occupancy in the brain.

Leo R Silberbauer1, Lucas Rischka1, Chrysoula Vraka2, Annette M Hartmann1, Godber Mathis Godbersen1, Cécile Philippe2, Daniel Pacher1, Lukas Nics2, Manfred Klöbl1, Jakob Unterholzner1, Thomas Stimpfl3, Wolfgang Wadsak2,4, Andreas Hahn1, Marcus Hacker2, Dan Rujescu1, Siegfried Kasper5, Rupert Lanzenberger1, Gregor Gryglewski6,7.   

Abstract

Strategies to personalize psychopharmacological treatment promise to improve efficacy and tolerability. We measured serotonin transporter occupancy immediately after infusion of the widely prescribed P-glycoprotein substrate citalopram and assessed to what extent variants of the ABCB1 gene affect drug target engagement in the brain in vivo. A total of 79 participants (39 female) including 31 patients with major depression and 48 healthy volunteers underwent two PET/MRI scans with the tracer [11C]DASB and placebo-controlled infusion of citalopram (8 mg) in a cross-over design. We tested the effect of six ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms and found lower SERT occupancy in ABCB1 rs2235015 minor allele carriers (n = 26, MAF = 0.18) compared to major allele homozygotes (t73 = 2.73, pFWE < 0.05) as well as in men compared to women (t73 = 3.33, pFWE < 0.05). These effects were robust to correction for citalopram plasma concentration, age and diagnosis. From occupancy we derived the ratio of occupied to unoccupied SERT, because in theory this measure is equal to the product of drug affinity and concentration at target sites. A model combining genotype with basic clinical variables, predicted that, at the same dosage, occupied to unoccupied SERT ratio was -14.48 ± 5.38% lower in rs2235015 minor allele carriers, +19.10 ± 6.95% higher in women, -4.83 ± 2.70% lower per 10 kg bodyweight, and -2.68 ± 3.07% lower per 10 years of age. Our results support the exploration of clinical algorithms with adjustment of initial citalopram dosing and highlight the potential of imaging-genetics for precision pharmacotherapy in psychiatry.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36071112     DOI: 10.1038/s41380-022-01733-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Psychiatry        ISSN: 1359-4184            Impact factor:   13.437


  61 in total

1.  Brain kinetics of paroxetine and fluoxetine on the third day of placebo substitution: a fluorine MRS study.

Authors:  M E Henry; C M Moore; M J Kaufman; D Michelson; M E Schmidt; E Stoddard; A J Vuckevic; P J Berreira; B M Cohen; P F Renshaw
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring: a systematic review.

Authors:  D J Touw; C Neef; A H Thomson; A A Vinks
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders, part 1: update 2013 on the acute and continuation treatment of unipolar depressive disorders.

Authors:  Michael Bauer; Andrea Pfennig; Emanuel Severus; Peter C Whybrow; Jules Angst; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Associating in vitro target binding and in vivo CNS occupancy of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in rats: the role of free drug concentrations.

Authors:  Christoffer Bundgaard; Christina Sveigaard; Lise T Brennum; Tine B Stensbøl
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 1.908

Review 6.  Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017.

Authors:  C Hiemke; N Bergemann; H W Clement; A Conca; J Deckert; K Domschke; G Eckermann; K Egberts; M Gerlach; C Greiner; G Gründer; E Haen; U Havemann-Reinecke; G Hefner; R Helmer; G Janssen; E Jaquenoud; G Laux; T Messer; R Mössner; M J Müller; M Paulzen; B Pfuhlmann; P Riederer; A Saria; B Schoppek; G Schoretsanitis; M Schwarz; M Silva Gracia; B Stegmann; W Steimer; J C Stingl; M Uhr; S Ulrich; S Unterecker; R Waschgler; G Zernig; G Zurek; P Baumann
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.788

7.  Results of the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression (GSRD) - basis for further research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Lucie Bartova; Markus Dold; Alexander Kautzky; Chiara Fabbri; Marie Spies; Alessandro Serretti; Daniel Souery; Julien Mendlewicz; Joseph Zohar; Stuart Montgomery; Alexandra Schosser; Siegfried Kasper
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Interactions between antidepressants and P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: clinical significance of in vitro and in vivo findings.

Authors:  Fionn E O'Brien; Timothy G Dinan; Brendan T Griffin; John F Cryan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  ABCB1 genotyping in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  Tanja Maria Brückl; Manfred Uhr
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.533

10.  Unbound brain concentration determines receptor occupancy: a correlation of drug concentration and brain serotonin and dopamine reuptake transporter occupancy for eighteen compounds in rats.

Authors:  Xingrong Liu; Olga Vilenski; Joyce Kwan; Subbu Apparsundaram; Robert Weikert
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.922

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.