Literature DB >> 36070000

Double-bundle non-anatomic ACL revision reconstruction with allograft resulted in a low revision rate at 10 years.

Luca Macchiarola1,2, Nicola Pizza3, Vittorio Patania3, Alberto Grassi3, Giacomo Dal Fabbro3, Maurilio Marcacci4, Stefano Zaffagnini3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed at reporting the long-term second revision rate and subjective clinical outcomes from a cohort of patients who underwent a double-bundle (DB) ACLR first revision with allograft at a single institution.
METHODS: The Institutional database was searched according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) patients that underwent DB-ACL first revision with Achilles tendon allograft, (2) surgery performed between January 2000 and December 2012, (3) age at revision ≥ 18 y/o. Patients' general information, history, surgical data, and personal contacts were extracted from charts. An online survey platform was implemented to collect responses via email. The survey questions included: date of surgeries, surgical data, date of graft failure and subsequent second ACL revision surgery, any other surgery of the index knee, contralateral ACLR, KOOS score, and Tegner scores.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included in the survival analysis, mean age at revision 32 ± 9.2 y/o, 71 males, mean BMI 24.7 ± 2.7, mean time from ACL to revision 6.8 ± 5.4 years, mean follow-up time 10.7 ± 1.4 years. There were 12 (15%) second ACL revisions during the follow-up period, three females and nine males, at a mean of 4.5 ± 3 years after the index surgery. The overall survival rates were 85% from a second ACL revision and 68% from all reoperations of the index knee. Considering only the successful procedures (61 patients), at final follow-up, the mean values for the KOOS subscales were 84 ± 15.5 for Pain, 88.1 ± 13.6 for Symptoms, 93 ± 11.6 for ADL, 75 ± 24.5 for Sport, and 71 ± 19.6 for Qol. Twenty-nine (48%) patients performed sports activity at the same level as before ACLR failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Double-bundle ACL revision with fresh-frozen Achilles allograft yields satisfactory results at long-term follow-up, with an 85% survival rate from a second ACL revision at mean 10 years' follow-up and good patient-reported clinical scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; ACL revision; ACL survival; Allograft; Double bundle; Revision

Year:  2022        PMID: 36070000     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07151-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  40 in total

1.  Biology of allograft incorporation.

Authors:  Michael J Eagan; David R McAllister
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 2.  Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Critical Analysis Review.

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Rachel M Frank; Andrew J Riff; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus allograft: intermediate-term outcome.

Authors:  S Chougule; G Tselentakis; Stefania Stefan; Georgeos Stefanakis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-14

Review 4.  What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Christopher Kim; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Stefano Zaffagnini; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  M H Getelman; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Return to Sport Following Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgina Glogovac; Adam P Schumaier; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with nonirradiated fresh-frozen patellar tendon allograft.

Authors:  Jeff A Fox; Mark Pierce; John Bojchuk; Jennifer Hayden; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Allograft tendons are a safe and effective option for revision ACL reconstruction: a clinical review.

Authors:  V Condello; U Zdanowicz; Berardo Di Matteo; T Spalding; P E Gelber; P Adravanti; P Heuberer; S Dimmen; B Sonnery-Cottet; C Hulet; M Bonomo; E Kon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A high level of knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in high revision rates.

Authors:  Malthe Fiil; Torsten Grønbech Nielsen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 10.  Use of Allografts in Orthopaedic Surgery: Safety, Procurement, Storage, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Adam J Beer; Tracy M Tauro; Michael L Redondo; David R Christian; Brian J Cole; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.