Literature DB >> 36069854

Clinical Presentation and Outcome Differences Between Black Patients and Patients of Other Races and Ethnicities With Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.

Pamela B Allen1, Subir Goyal2, Tim Niyogusaba1, Colin O'Leary1, Amy Ayers1, Erica S Tarabadkar3, Mohammad K Khan4, Mary Jo Lechowicz5.   

Abstract

Importance: Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS) has an increased incidence in Black patients, but clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes have been poorly characterized. Objective: To assess racial differences in presentation and outcome and identify drivers for racial disparities in MF/SS. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of 566 patients with MF/SS diagnosed from 1990 to 2020 and seen at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University and Grady Memorial Hospital, both in Atlanta, Georgia. Self-reported race and ethnicity were obtained from patient medical records and analyzed as 2 groups: non-Hispanic Black (Black) and all other races and ethnicities, including Asian, Hispanic, White, and unknown/undeclared (non-Black). Main Outcomes and Measures: Univariate and multivariable models and Kaplan-Meier assessments were analyzed for overall survival and time to next treatment. The primary outcome was to assess differences in overall survival by racial and ethnic group. The hypotheses were formulated prior to data collection.
Results: Of the 566 patients with MF/SS identified (mean [SD] age 55 [16.4] years; 270 (47.7%) female), 257 were Black and 309 were non-Black. Black race was associated with increased rates of progression to a higher TNMB stage (39.8% in Black patients vs 29.1% in non-Black patients; P < .001) but not survival. Black patients were younger and had increased female predominance, higher TNMB stage, higher tumor stage, nodal involvement, and higher lactate dehydrogenase level compared with non-Black patients with MF/SS. Hypopigmented MF (HMF) was found in 62 patients, who were mostly Black (n = 59). Hypopigmented MF was significantly associated with survival on univariate and multivariable models, with 10-year survival of 100% in patients with HMF compared with 51.8% in patients without HMF. Black race was only associated with inferior outcomes after excluding patients with HMF who were younger than 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.02-2.55; P = .04), but not in patients older than 60 years (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.80-1.81; P = .37). On multivariate analysis, among the cohort without HMF who were younger than 60 years, Black race remained statistically significant when controlling for cancer stage and large-cell transformation (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.08-2.87; P = .43). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, Black patients with MF/SS showed distinct clinical presentations and patterns of progression with heterogeneous outcomes depending on age at presentation and presence of HMF.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36069854      PMCID: PMC9453633          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   11.816


  10 in total

1.  Racial disparity in mycosis fungoides: An analysis of 4495 cases from the US National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Chang Su; Kevin A Nguyen; Harrison X Bai; Ya Cao; Yongguang Tao; Rong Xiao; Giorgos Karakousis; Paul J Zhang; Guiying Zhang
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Clinical Outcome and Prognosis of Young Patients with Mycosis Fungoides.

Authors:  Pooja Virmani; Laura Levin; Patricia L Myskowski; Eileen Flores; Michael A Marchetti; Anna Skripnik Lucas; Melissa Pulitzer; Steven Horwitz; Tanya Trippett; Alison Moskowitz; Christiane Querfeld
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Poorer prognosis of African-American patients with mycosis fungoides: an analysis of the SEER dataset, 1988 to 2008.

Authors:  Sameer K Nath; James B Yu; Lynn D Wilson
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-01-03

Review 4.  European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome - Update 2017.

Authors:  Franz Trautinger; Johanna Eder; Chalid Assaf; Martine Bagot; Antonio Cozzio; Reinhard Dummer; Robert Gniadecki; Claus-Detlev Klemke; Pablo L Ortiz-Romero; Evangelia Papadavid; Nicola Pimpinelli; Pietro Quaglino; Annamari Ranki; Julia Scarisbrick; Rudolf Stadler; Liisa Väkevä; Maarten H Vermeer; Sean Whittaker; Rein Willemze; Robert Knobler
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Outcomes after diagnosis of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome before 30 years of age: a population-based study.

Authors:  Weiyun Z Ai; Theresa H Keegan; David J Press; Juan Yang; Laura B Pincus; Youn H Kim; Ellen T Chang
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  Age, race, sex, stage, and incidence of cutaneous lymphoma.

Authors:  Lynn D Wilson; Ginette A Hinds; James B Yu
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2012-10

7.  Incidence and survival patterns of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas in the United States.

Authors:  Muhammad Hassaan Imam; Pareen J Shenoy; Christopher R Flowers; Adrienne Phillips; Mary Jo Lechowicz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-01-07

8.  Outcomes and prognostic factors in African American and black patients with mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome: Retrospective analysis of 157 patients from a referral cancer center.

Authors:  Shamir Geller; Emily Lebowitz; Melissa P Pulitzer; Steven M Horwitz; Alison J Moskowitz; Steve Dusza; Patricia L Myskowski
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Mycosis fungoides: developments in incidence, treatment and survival.

Authors:  A E Kaufman; K Patel; K Goyal; D O'Leary; N Rubin; D Pearson; K Bohjanen; A Goyal
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 6.166

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.