Literature DB >> 36069770

Genetically manipulating endogenous Kras levels and oncogenic mutations in vivo influences tissue patterning of murine tumorigenesis.

Özgün Le Roux1, Nicole L K Pershing1, Erin Kaltenbrun1, Nicole J Newman1, Jeffrey I Everitt2, Elisa Baldelli3, Mariaelena Pierobon3, Emanuel F Petricoin3, Christopher M Counter1.   

Abstract

Despite multiple possible oncogenic mutations in the proto-oncogene KRAS, unique subsets of these mutations are detected in different cancer types. As KRAS mutations occur early, if not being the initiating event, these mutational biases are ostensibly a product of how normal cells respond to the encoded oncoprotein. Oncogenic mutations can impact not only the level of active oncoprotein, but also engagement with proteins. To attempt to separate these two effects, we generated four novel Cre-inducible (LSL) Kras alleles in mice with the biochemically distinct G12D or Q61R mutations and encoded by native (nat) rare or common (com) codons to produce low or high protein levels. While there were similarities, each allele also induced a distinct transcriptional response shortly after activation in vivo. At one end of the spectrum, activating the KrasLSL-natG12D allele induced transcriptional hallmarks suggestive of an expansion of multipotent cells, while at the other end, activating the KrasLSL-comQ61R allele led to hallmarks of hyperproliferation and oncogenic stress. Evidence suggests that these changes may be a product of signaling differences due to increased protein expression as well as the specific mutation. To determine the impact of these distinct responses on RAS mutational patterning in vivo, all four alleles were globally activated, revealing that hematolymphopoietic lesions were permissive to the level of active oncoprotein, squamous tumors were permissive to the G12D mutant, while carcinomas were permissive to both these features. We suggest that different KRAS mutations impart unique signaling properties that are preferentially capable of inducing tumor initiation in a distinct cell-specific manner.
© 2022, Le Roux et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RAS; cancer; cancer biology; genetically engineered mice; mouse; oncogenes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36069770      PMCID: PMC9451540          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.75715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.713


  75 in total

1.  Restoration of p53 function leads to tumour regression in vivo.

Authors:  Andrea Ventura; David G Kirsch; Margaret E McLaughlin; David A Tuveson; Jan Grimm; Laura Lintault; Jamie Newman; Elizabeth E Reczek; Ralph Weissleder; Tyler Jacks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Cancer cells in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumor-propagating-cancer stem cells: distinct, overlapping or same populations.

Authors:  S Floor; W C G van Staveren; D Larsimont; J E Dumont; C Maenhaut
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Creation of human tumour cells with defined genetic elements.

Authors:  W C Hahn; C M Counter; A S Lundberg; R L Beijersbergen; M W Brooks; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mechanisms of guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis by Ras and Ras-GAP proteins as rationalized by ab initio QM/MM simulations.

Authors:  Bella L Grigorenko; Alexander V Nemukhin; Maria S Shadrina; Igor A Topol; Stanley K Burt
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-02-01

6.  The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells.

Authors:  Sendurai A Mani; Wenjun Guo; Mai-Jing Liao; Elinor Ng Eaton; Ayyakkannu Ayyanan; Alicia Y Zhou; Mary Brooks; Ferenc Reinhard; Cheng Cheng Zhang; Michail Shipitsin; Lauren L Campbell; Kornelia Polyak; Cathrin Brisken; Jing Yang; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  The Frequency of Ras Mutations in Cancer.

Authors:  Ian A Prior; Fiona E Hood; James L Hartley
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Kras regulatory elements and exon 4A determine mutation specificity in lung cancer.

Authors:  Minh D To; Christine E Wong; Anthony N Karnezis; Reyno Del Rosario; Roberto Di Lauro; Allan Balmain
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-08-31       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The cell of origin and subtype of K-Ras-induced lung tumors are modified by Notch and Sox2.

Authors:  Xia Xu; Lingling Huang; Christopher Futtner; Brian Schwab; Rishi R Rampersad; Yun Lu; Thomas A Sporn; Brigid L M Hogan; Mark W Onaitis
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  KRAS4A directly regulates hexokinase 1.

Authors:  Caroline R Amendola; James P Mahaffey; Seth J Parker; Ian M Ahearn; Wei-Ching Chen; Mo Zhou; Helen Court; Jie Shi; Sebastian L Mendoza; Michael J Morten; Eli Rothenberg; Eyal Gottlieb; Youssef Z Wadghiri; Richard Possemato; Stevan R Hubbard; Allan Balmain; Alec C Kimmelman; Mark R Philips
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.