Literature DB >> 36068452

The determination of the radiochemical purity of Actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals: a conundrum.

Janke Kleynhans1, Adriano Duatti2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36068452      PMCID: PMC9448838          DOI: 10.1186/s41181-022-00175-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem        ISSN: 2365-421X


× No keyword cloud information.

To the editor

Main text

The recent emphasis on actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals has led to underestimate a serious problem related to the measurement of their radiochemical purity (RCP). The rules of Good Radiopharmacy Practice (GRP) dictate that RCP of an injectable radiopharmaceutical must be determined by a suitable analytical method prior to patient administration. RCP is defined as the ’ratio of the activity of a radionuclide in a stated chemical species in a material over the total activity of all species containing that radionuclide in this material’ (Gillings et al. 2021). A logical implication of this definition is that RCP for a radiopharmaceutical can be rigorously determined only after establishing its true molecular identity. Since this fundamental characterization cannot be performed routinely in a radiopharmacy with conventional quality control methods, a widely accepted approach is to first isolate and structurally characterize an authentic sample of the chemical species supposed to possess the same composition and molecular architecture of the radiopharmaceutical. This fundamental characterization is usually accomplished by applying techniques for structure determination to macroscopic amounts of the authentic sample synthesized using a stable isotope of the radionuclide incorporated into the radiopharmaceutical. Then, the chromatographic profile of the authentic sample can be compared with the profile of the corresponding radiopharmaceutical both collected using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and/or Instant Thin-layer Chromatography (ITLC) under the same experimental conditions for cross validation (Thakral et al. 2021; Hooijman et al. 2021). When there exists a close matching between these two chromatographic profiles, it is reasonable to assume that the radiopharmaceutical has the same chemical identity of the authentic sample. After this preliminary characterization, to assess RCP of a radiopharmaceutical prepared routinely in a hospital setting in compliance with GRP rules, it is sufficient to check whether its HPLC or TLC chromatogram always includes the peak corresponding to the authentic sample. The paucity of purified actinium materials combined with the lack of stable isotopes and measurable spectroscopic properties for this element has prevented the isolation and structural investigation of authentic samples of its coordination compounds and made it arduous to determine their chromatographic properties (Deblonde et al. 2021; Kovács 2021). Without the support of these data, it appears difficult to strictly adhere to the rigorous definition of RCP. The issue of RCP becomes more dramatic considering that the chromatographic profiles of actinium-225 complexes can be measured only after decay of the pure α-emitting radionuclide to its γ emitting daughters. Exemplary are the conventional methods to detect the γ emission of francium-221 after reaching the secular equilibrium with the precursor actinium-225 (Hooijman et al. 2021). Although models (Kelly et al. 2021) have been developed to calculate RCP of actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals from γ decay of francium-221, this approach raises serious questions about the interpretation of chromatographic results since the integrity of actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals is always challenged by the so-called alpha recoil effect caused by the emission of the α particle (Kozempel et al. 2018). This process can irreversibly disrupt the molecular scaffolding of the coordination complex, thus making the attribution of chromatographic data to a specific radiolabeled species uncertain. Ultimately, the simple ITLC cannot be considered on its own a suitable method for routinely assessing the RCP of actinium-225 compounds since radiolysis with alpha emitters very efficiently produces impurities that are not identified. These uncertainties demonstrate that accurate measurement of RCP for actinium-225 radiopharmaceuticals still constitutes an unsolved problem in radiopharmacy.
  6 in total

1.  Theoretical Study of Actinide(III)-DOTA Complexes.

Authors:  Attila Kovács
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 2.  Progress in Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy. What We Learned about Recoils Release from In Vivo Generators.

Authors:  Ján Kozempel; Olga Mokhodoeva; Martin Vlk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Guideline on current good radiopharmacy practice (cGRPP) for the small-scale preparation of radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Nic Gillings; Olaug Hjelstuen; Jim Ballinger; Martin Behe; Clemens Decristoforo; Philip Elsinga; Valentina Ferrari; Petra Kolenc Peitl; Jacek Koziorowski; Peter Laverman; Thomas L Mindt; Oliver Neels; Meltem Ocak; Marianne Patt; Sergio Todde
Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem       Date:  2021-02-12

4.  In-House Preparation and Quality Control of Ac-225 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-617 for the Targeted Alpha Therapy of Castration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma.

Authors:  Parul Thakral; Jakub Simecek; Sebastian Marx; Jyotsna Kumari; Vineet Pant; Ishita Barat Sen
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  A suitable time point for quantifying the radiochemical purity of 225Ac-labeled radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  James M Kelly; Alejandro Amor-Coarasa; Elizabeth Sweeney; Justin J Wilson; Patrick W Causey; John W Babich
Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem       Date:  2021-12-20

6.  Development of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T for Targeted Alpha Therapy According to GMP Guidelines for Treatment of mCRPC.

Authors:  Eline L Hooijman; Yozlem Chalashkan; Sui Wai Ling; Figen F Kahyargil; Marcel Segbers; Frank Bruchertseifer; Alfred Morgenstern; Yann Seimbille; Stijn L W Koolen; Tessa Brabander; Erik de Blois
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.