Literature DB >> 36068353

Fluoroscopy screening time and radiation dose during complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Siavash Falahatkar1, Purya Haghjoo2, Samaneh Esmaeili1, Ehsan Kazemnezhad1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is procedure of choice for treatment of large urinary tract calculi. This study aimed to investigate the affecting factors on fluoroscopy screening time (FST) and radiation dose (RD) of patients undergoing complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL).
METHODS: Analytic cross-sectional study was performed on 355 patients who underwent csPCNL. The correlation between the FST and RD and patients' demographics, stone characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to explore various parameters which affect FST and RD.
RESULTS: Of all 355 patients, 191 (54.65%) were male and 161 were (45.35%) female with mean age of 48.29 ± 12.38 (16-82) years. BMI was 27.61 ± 4.53 (16.61-39.00) kg/m2. The mean operative time was 45.87 ± 18.29 min with mean FST of 101.72 ± 62.00 s. BMI, operative time, success rate, complications, stone number, and tract number had a significant relationship with FST and RD (P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, BMI, tract number and success rate were found to be independent predictors for FST and RD. Age, gender, operation side, GFR, target calyx, lithotripsy history, stone opacity, size and site, stone configuration and distribution, and hydronephrosis did not have any correlation with FST and RD (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: BMI, success rate and tract number can be significant predictor for FST and RD during csPCNL. Identifying the affecting factors on FST and RD can help the surgeon to minimize the danger of radiation exposure by predicting and preoperative planning.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Fluoroscopy screening time; PCNL; Radiation dose; Radiation exposure

Year:  2022        PMID: 36068353     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04138-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   3.661


  5 in total

1.  Risk of radiation exposure during PCNL.

Authors:  Heshmatollah Soufi Majidpour
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 1.510

Review 2.  An Update on Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Gholamreza Mokhtari; Mojtaba Teimoori
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 1.510

Review 3.  Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: pro.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Aliakbar Allahkhah; Soheil Soltanipour
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.510

Review 4.  Radiation safety issues in fluoroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Pratik Kumar
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.510

5.  Increasing stone complexity does not affect fluoroscopy time in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Annah Vollstedt; Johann Ingimarsson; Lawrence Dagrosa; Vernon Pais
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-04-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.