| Literature DB >> 36067161 |
Emelynne Gabrielly de Oliveira Santos1, Kelly Graziani Giacchero Vedana2, Isabelle Ribeiro Barbosa3.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the prevalence and factors associated with suicidal ideation among farmers. Cross-sectional study carried out between 2019 and 2020 with 450 farmers in Rio Grande do Norte. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was evaluated using the Beck Suicidal Ideation Inventory, and sociodemographic, health, income, work and alcohol abuse variables were analyzed. The Chi-square test was used to compare the proportions of the outcome between the categories of each variable. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to analyze associated factors and estimate prevalence ratios [PR]. The prevalence of suicidal ideation was 12.4% [95%CI 9.69-15.84] and, in the bivariate analysis, it was associated with sociodemographic, health, income and work variables. In the final multivariate model, the variables that remained significant and were associated with a higher prevalence of SI were: female gender [PR = 3.28], diagnosis of mental disorder in the family [PR = 2.37], presence of common mental disorder [PR = 2.50], alcohol abuse [PR = 2.22] and employment relationship-salaried or temporary [R = 1.91]. Thus, suicidal ideation among farmers is mainly associated with health aspects, especially mental health, work and the female sex, and signals the need to strengthen public policies for suicide prevention with the targeting of effective strategies for the farmers.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36067161 PMCID: PMC9447890 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273625
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Descriptive and bivariate analysis of suicidal ideation and its association with sociodemographic variables of farmers in the city of Caicó-RN.
| Variables | N (%) | Suicidal ideation | Prevalence Ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 95% CI | p-value | Gross PR | 95% CI | p-value | ||
| Female sex | 185 (41.11%) | 16.22 | 11.55–22.28 |
| 1.65 | 1.01–2.70 |
|
| Male sex | 265 (58.90%) | 9.81 | 6.75–14.04 | 1 | |||
|
| |||||||
| 18–39 years | 139 (30.90%) | 14.39 | 9.44–21.30 | 0.207 | 1 | ||
| 40–59 years | 186 (41.33%) | 13.98 | 9.67–19.77 | 0.97 | 0.54–1.74 | 0.923 | |
| >60 years | 125 (27.78%) | 8.00 | 4.34–14.28 | 0.55 | 0.26–1.18 | 0.130 | |
|
| |||||||
| Married | 315 (70.00%) | 13.97 | 10.54–18.27 | 0.326 | 1 | ||
| Single/divorced | 100 (22.22%) | 9.00 | 4.72–16.47 | 0.64 | 0.31–1.31 | 0.230 | |
| Widowed | 35 (7.78%) | 8.57 | 2.73–23.80 | 0.61 | 0.19–1.97 | 0.413 | |
|
| |||||||
| White/others | 212 (47.11%) | 10.38 | 6.91–15.28 | 0.268 | 1 | ||
| Black | 42 (9.33%) | 9.52 | 3.56–23.04 | 0.91 | 0.31–2.66 | 0.875 | |
| Brown | 196 (43.56%) | 15.31 | 10.89–21.08 | 1.47 | 0.85–2.55 | 0.166 | |
|
| |||||||
| High school and university | 59 (13.11%) | 10.17 | 4.59–21.00 | 0.266 | 1 | ||
| Elementary School | 256 (56.90%) | 10.94 | 7.64–15.40 | 1.07 | 0.46–2.48 | 0.864 | |
| No schooling | 135 (30.00%) | 16.30 | 10.94–23.56 | 1.60 | 0.68–3.75 | 0.277 | |
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 332 (73.78%) | 13.55 | 10.26–17.69 | 0.232 | 1 | ||
| No | 118 (26.22%) | 9.32 | 5.21–16.11 | 0.68 | 0.36–1.28 | 0.241 | |
|
| |||||||
| Urban area | 34 (7.56%) | 14.71 | 6.15–31.17 | 0.678 | 1 | ||
| Rural area | 416 (92.44%) | 12.26 | 9.43–15.79 | 0.83 | 0.35–1.95 | 0.675 | |
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 108 (24.00%) | 13.89 | 8.51–21.83 | 0.602 | 1 | ||
| No | 342 (76.00%) | 11.99 | 8.93–15.89 | 0.86 | 0.49–1.49 | 0.601 | |
95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval PR: Prevalence ratio.
Descriptive and bivariate analysis of suicidal ideation and its association with variables of health aspects among farmers in the city of Caicó-RN.
| Variables | N (%) | Suicidal ideation | Prevalence ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 95% CI | p-value | Gross PR | 95% CI | p-value | ||
|
| |||||||
| Very good/Good | 234 (52.00%) | 12.39 | 8.73–17.29 | 0.973 | 1 | ||
| Fair/Bad/Very bad | 216 (48.00%) | 12.50 | 8.69–17.64 | 1.00 | 0.61–1.64 | 0.973 | |
|
| |||||||
| No | 200 (44.44%) | 6.00 | 3.42–10.29 |
| 1 | ||
| Yes | 250 (55.56%) | 17.60 | 13.34–22.85 | 2.93 | 1.59–5.40 |
| |
|
| |||||||
| No | 153 (34.00%) | 6.54 | 3.53–11.76 |
| 1 | ||
| Yes | 297 (66.00%) | 15.49 | 11.78–20.08 | 2.36 | 1.22–4.56 |
| |
|
| |||||||
| No | 332 (71.56%) | 8.70 | 6.06–12.32 |
| 1 | ||
| Yes | 118 (28.44%) | 21.88 | 15.51–29.91 | 2.51 | 1.55–4.07 |
| |
|
| |||||||
| No | 327 (72.67%) | 11.31 | 8.29–15.24 | 0.237 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 123 (27.33%) | 15.45 | 10.04–23.01 | 1.36 | 0.81–2.28 | 0.235 | |
|
| |||||||
| No | 306 (68.00%) | 9.80 | 6.92–13.69 |
| 1 | ||
| Yes | 144 (32.00%) | 18.06 | 12.56–25.24 | 1.84 | 1.31–2.99 |
| |
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 340 (75.56%) | 13.53 | 10.27–17.61 | 0.220 | 1 | ||
| No | 110 (24.44%) | 9.09 | 4.93–16.14 | 0.67 | 0.35–1.28 | 0.231 | |
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 426 (94.67%) | 12.21 | 9.41–15.68 | 0.520 | 1 | ||
| No | 24 (5.33%) | 16.67 | 6.24–37.52 | 1.36 | 0.53–3.46 | 0.512 | |
95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval PR: Prevalence ratio
Descriptive and bivariate analysis between suicidal ideation and its association with aspects of income and work of farmers in the city of Caicó-RN.
| Variables | N (%) | Suicidal ideation | Prevalence ratio | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 95% CI | p-value | Crude PR | 95% CI | p-value | ||
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 313 (69.56%) | 11.56 | 8.39–15.55 | 0.360 | 1 | ||
| No | 137 (30.44%) | 14.60 | 9.58–21.59 | 1.26 | 0.76–2.11 | 0.359 | |
|
| |||||||
| No income | 30 (6.67%) | 20.00 | 9.12–38.36 | 0.584 | 1.80 | 0.49–6.51 | 0.370 |
| Up to 1/2 minimum wage | 81 (18.00%) | 13.58 | 7.64–22.98 | 1.22 | 0.36–4.06 | 0.743 | |
| 1 mw | 312 (69.33%) | 11.54 | 8.42–15.60 | 1.03 | 0.34–3.15 | 0.947 | |
| Above 1 mw | 27 (6.00%) | 11.11 | 3.53–29.87 | 1 | |||
|
| |||||||
| < 6 hours | 302 (67.11%) | 11.92 | 8.70–16.10 | 0.848 | 1 | ||
| > 6 hours | 111 (24.67%) | 12.61 | 7.58–20.24 | 1.05 | 0.59–1.88 | 0.848 | |
|
| |||||||
| Owner | 307 (68.22%) | 12.70 | 9.40–16.93 |
| 1 | ||
| Tenant | 84 (18.67%) | 5.95 | 2.47–13.60 | 0.46 | 0.19–1.15 |
| |
| Salaried or temporary | 46 (10.22%) | 21.74 | 12.01–36.10 | 1.71 | 0.91–3.18 |
| |
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 215 (47.78%) | 14.88 | 10.70–20.32 | 0.136 | 1 | ||
| No | 217 (48.22%) | 22 (10.14) | 6.75–14.94 | 0.68 | 0.40–1.13 | 0.140 | |
|
| |||||||
| No | 235 (52.22%) | 11.49 | 7.98–16.26 | 0.488 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 197 (43.78%) | 13.71 | 9.55–19.28 | 1.19 | 0.72–1.96 | 0.489 | |
|
| |||||||
| No | 149 (33.11%) | 14.77 | 9.89–21.45 | 0.284 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 269 (59.78%) | 11.15 | 7.89–15.52 | 0.75 | 0.45–1.26 | 0.284 | |
|
| |||||||
| No | 264 (58.67%) | 14.39 | 10.63–19.19 | 0.162 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 146 (32.44%) | 9.59 | 5.74–15.58 | 0.66 | 0.37–1.18 | 0.169 | |
Multivariate model between suicidal ideation and its association with sociodemographic, labor and health variables of farmers in the city of Caicó-RN.
| Variables | Adjusted PR | CI95% | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female sex | 3.28 | 1.92–5.61 | <0.005 |
| Diagnosis of Mental Disorder in the Family | 2.37 | 1.30–4.31 | 0.004 |
| Common mental disorder | 2.50 | 1.31–4.73 | 0.005 |
| Alcohol abuse | 2.22 | 1.31–3.73 | 0.003 |
| Employment relationship—salaried or temporary | 1.91 | 1.02–3.57 | 0.040 |
| Constant | 0.48 | 0.02–0.10 | <0.005 |
95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval PR: Prevalence ratio